Do you have to pay for helping someone else to take something out of kindness, but if you lose it?

Yes, you need to compensate, and helping someone else to take something is equivalent to taking the responsibility of safekeeping, and you can't feel that you don't need to compensate because you have good intentions, so what if someone else also tells you that you actually accepted it?

Need. This is your responsibility, since you have promised it, you must do it, if you can't do it, don't agree.

Compensation is required both legally and reasonably, unless the party waives the claim and can be exempted. Because the law supports the loss of things that are kept or carried by others, it is contrary to the principle of fair responsibility, and it is difficult to identify and operate.

I think that if you help someone else to take something out of good intentions, and you lose it, in this case, it depends on whether the other party will let you pay for it, in fact, in this case, although you are out of good intentions, the other person does not let you help him, and you should compensate.

When you take something for someone else out of good intentions, do you want to compensate for the loss? It is necessary to compensate from the legal and reasonable point of view, unless the party waives the claim. Because the law must support people to keep or carry items without compensation, which violates the principle of equitable responsibility and is difficult to identify and operate.

This is to be compensated, next time you should be careful not to lose things, and you must be careful and careful in doing things.

Regardless of the purpose, compensation must be paid for damage or loss of other people's property.

Is there legal and reasonable compensation for a person in good faith to take something and lose it, unless the party waives the claim? Since the law should support people to keep or transport lost property or not pay, it violates the principle of equitable responsibility and is difficult to determine and operate.

It's really hard to say, so it depends on what the other party means.

Legal Analysis: It depends on the situation, according to what you said, it may fall within the scope of the custody contract. If it is kept free of charge, under normal circumstances, it will not be liable for compensation if it is not due to the intention or gross negligence of the custodian; However, if the storage fee has already been charged, compensation will be made according to the circumstances.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 892: The custodian shall take proper care of the custodians. The parties may agree on a place or method of storage. Except in emergency situations or to protect the interests of the depositor, the place or method of storage shall not be changed without authorization.

Article 893: Where the depositary delivers a defective property or special storage measures are required according to the nature of the depositary, the depositary shall inform the depositary of the relevant circumstances. If the depositor fails to inform the depositor, resulting in the loss of the deposited property, the custodian shall not be liable for compensation; If the custodian suffers losses as a result, the depositor shall be liable for compensation unless the custodian knew or should have known and failed to take remedial measures.

Look what's going on. "Brother, settle accounts. "If it's valuables, you'll definitely have to make a claim.

If he's just losing something ordinary, I don't think it matters, I'm just buying one. If it's something a little more valuable. For example, I would be a little angry and distressed and tell him what I was thinking. I won't let him compensate me.

I just want him to understand that everything should be done with care, not carelessness. Because we are good friends, I don't care about the gains and losses with her.

Having said that, the world is cruel and complicated, not everyone will tolerate your unintentional mistakes, and any growth needs to pay a price. If you tolerate each other, she will be grateful to you in the future, life in the world, going around and around, maybe when you also use each other, take the road well, and make friends with your heart.

Your sincerity and generosity will surely make you gain many things that are more important than money. She sincerely admits her mistakes, then she must be extremely guilty, restless, and don't know how to face you, in my heart, good friends are far more important than those things outside the body.

Hello, glad for your question. This is from a sentimental point of view. It is possible not to compensate, of course, this needs to be let the other party say it, and it is not good to say it yourself.

From a legal point of view, it is necessary to compensate, because others ask you for help, and after you agree, you have the obligation to take care of it, and you can't take it lightly because it is not your own, but if you have evidence to prove that you are responsible, or it is a force majeure that causes damage to the goods, you can not be liable for compensation.

Dear, hello, out of good intentions to help others take things, but the thing is lost, and the compensation is from the statutory and reasonable to compensate the old Yuhe, unless the party gives up the claim, the button can be patted to avoid compensation. Because the law supports the loss of things for someone to keep or carry Qingsheng without compensation, it is contrary to the principle of fair responsibility, and it is difficult to identify and operate.

When encountering such a situation, it depends on what kind of relationship you have with this person, and it also depends on what you have lost, and whether it is worth it! You have a general relationship with the other party, and if you lose something very valuable, you should let him compensate for it, on the contrary, if you have a good relationship with him, and the lost thing is not worth a few dollars, then forget it, you can't hurt each other's harmony because of a little worthless thing! I think so.

If the loss is not caused by the fault of the finder, the finder has no obligation to compensate. However, if the finder deliberately discarded it or failed to take due care of the found object, he is liable for compensation. If the finder is not at fault, he may claim reimbursement from the owner for the necessary costs of keeping the found object or for the costs incurred in finding the owner.

I've had this happen too, losing a phone.

It was also lost by my friend, but the difference is that he said he wanted compensation, and then I refused.

The old doesn't go, the new doesn't come.

Actually, it's terrible to come across something like you.

As for compensation, I think it depends on whether you want to be friends with him.

As for the method, you can learn the method downstairs.

If he has the financial strength to compensate and is indifferent, I think such a friend can only be a friend of wine and meat, and he will not be very intimate, if he has no financial strength, can you also take the opportunity to test it.

Friends sometimes have to be a little more generous, but sometimes one step of caution can also be tricked by you.

I wish you good friends!

If the custody is for compensation, it shall be liable for damages, and if the custody is gratuitous, there is gross negligence or intentionality, the liability for damages.

Article 20 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China: Where property losses are caused by infringement of the personal rights and interests of others, compensation shall be made in accordance with the losses suffered by the infringed party; Where it is difficult to determine the losses of the infringed party, and the infringer obtains benefits as a result, compensation shall be made in accordance with the benefits obtained; Where it is difficult to determine the benefits obtained by the infringer, and the infringed party and the infringer disagree on the amount of compensation and file a lawsuit with the people's court, the people's court shall determine the amount of compensation based on the actual circumstances.

Dear, hello, out of good intentions to help others take something, but lose the thing to compensate, from both statutory and reasonable compensation, unless the party gives up the claim can be exempted. Because the law supports the loss of things for someone to keep or carry, it is contrary to the principle of fairness and responsibility, and it is difficult to identify and operate.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1165:Where the perpetrator infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others due to fault and causes harm, they shall bear tort liability.

Where it is presumed that the actor is at fault in accordance with the provisions of law, and he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability.

Article 1167:Where the tortious conduct endangers the safety of others' persons or property, the infringed party has the right to request that the infringer bear tortious liability such as stopping the infringement, removing obstructions, or eliminating dangers.