Isn t it like that to help someone else take something and find it back?

If you need to be responsible, you must pay about 30% of the responsibility, because he took the initiative to let you find something.

Take full responsibility, since you are willing to help others take things, you are obliged to take good care of things, and now because you are negligent and things are lost, you should be fully responsible. Of course, you are helping the other party to get something, and you can negotiate with the other party to solve it.

Isn't it like that to help someone else take something and find it back? It depends on what it is, if it is not too valuable, it should not be a big responsibility, but if you help others to take something particularly valuable, then you need to bear a lot of responsibility, because after all, you are helping others to take things, you help others to take things and you get them away, this must be legally responsible, although it is recovered, but it is not the original way, you must be responsible, and you need to bear a lot of responsibility.

What is the value of the thing? If it's valuable, you'll have to pay at least a third, and if it's not worth anything, you shouldn't have to, because if it's mine, I'll do the same to my friend.

If they have been recovered, then you definitely don't need to be responsible, unless you have lost everything now, then you have to bear the corresponding responsibility, so if the things are found and others have forgiven you, then you don't have to bear any responsibility.

I think it's definitely your responsibility, but there's also his reason, so I think you should be 80% responsible, but no matter what, you still have to pay him.

This friend, if you take something from someone else, even if you give it back to him, you will still be charged with stealing.

However, from the perspective of the law, if you return it to the other party, you will be punished lightly, but it must meet the standards of the law.

Help someone get something out and get it back. If you don't get it back, you really still have to bear some responsibility, after all, this is a promise. There shall be no responsibility for the size of the responsibility.

If you have done something for someone else, it is too late for others to thank you, why do you want to accompany him to take responsibility?

It's good to find it back if you drop it, and if you don't find it, you can compensate her, and you don't have to blame yourself too much

Helping people take things --- manage for no reason, and I apologize --- when I find it, please forgive me.

Sometimes, you get a cold shoulder in your life, mainly because others don't know you yet. If you are just given a cold reception, you doubt yourself and your reason is clouded, and you will not be able to get closer to others. If you want others to accept yourself happily, you might as well treat yourself coldly and not be surprised, always act rationally without being arrogant or humble, and start by changing the impression of others.

If it is determined that the other party is at fault, it needs to bear the liability for compensation. The first state needs to conduct an appraisal of the loss of property before determining the liability of the other party.

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 893: Where the depositary delivers a defective property or special storage measures are required according to the nature of the depositary, the depositary shall inform the depositary of the relevant circumstances. If the depositor fails to inform the depositor, resulting in the loss of the deposited goods, the custodian shall not be liable for compensation; If the custodian suffers losses as a result, the depositor shall be liable for compensation unless the custodian knew or should have known and failed to take remedial measures to bury the rocks.

Article 897: During the custody period, if the custodian causes damage or loss to the custodian due to improper custody, the custodian shall be liable for compensation. However, if the gratuitous custodian proves that he or she is not intentional or grossly negligent, he shall not be liable for compensation.

Article 898: Where a depositor deposits currency, valuable** or other valuables, he or she shall make a declaration to the custodian, which shall accept or seal it; If the depositor fails to declare it, the custodian may compensate for the damage or loss of the article in accordance with the general article.

Dear, hello, out of good intentions to help others take things, but the thing is lost, and the compensation is from the statutory and reasonable to compensate the old Yuhe, unless the party gives up the claim, the button can be patted to avoid compensation. Because the law supports the loss of things for someone to keep or carry Qingsheng without compensation, it is contrary to the principle of fair responsibility, and it is difficult to identify and operate.