Examples of success in the doctrine of doctrine, examples of the reality of doctrine

At the end of the Qing Dynasty, the "master Yi long technique to control the razor" belongs to the doctrine of taking. `

In daily life, it is like the introduction of foreign advanced technology. Learning good aspects from others to enrich oneself is considered to be a doctrine!Too much, broaden and write on your own! `

The book "Boiled Three Kingdoms" combines the experience of historical struggle with business warfare, and creates a new concept of using the ideas of the ancients for enterprise management, which has achieved good results. Wenzhou businessmen borrowed from the ancient Jin Dynasty to form a successful way of forming a business gang, family business, expanded capital, and developed a large number of small and medium-sized enterprises. "This is the successful application of the doctrine of Sina".

On the other hand, China's reform and opening up has "brought" advanced foreign enterprise management systems and marketing models. Many state-owned enterprises have seized the opportunity to learn and apply and get out of the predicament.

Anshan Iron and Steel, like other state-owned enterprises, before the reform and opening up, the organization was bloated, the technology was backward, and the efficiency was low, but they used high-tech and advanced management methods to transform the company, and the profit in 2003 reached 1.5 billion yuan, the highest level in history, and became a world-class modern iron and steel enterprise. If the "new doctrine of taking the state" has preserved the state-owned enterprises, it is equivalent to preserving the public ownership system, that is, it has preserved socialism.

It should not be denied that our industrial products are inferior to foreign goods in many aspects, and the influence of foreign brands is not the same as ours. Our industry started off on the "low end" and there are widespread "integrity" issues.

After China's accession to the WTO, the import of a large number of foreign commodities will not only improve people's material living standards and make people truly feel the benefits brought about by reform and opening up, but will also promote the transformation of our industry from processing with supplied materials and low-end commodities to high-grade commodities with independent intellectual property rights, and realize the leapfrog development of industrial informatization.

"It's for competition, it's for efficiency." The existence of competition has always sounded the alarm bell for reform, and the continuous progress of reform will always promote the healthy and rapid development of the economy. Of course, there are also some problems with the "new take-it-or-leave-it" doctrine, and the Wahaha Group became the leader of China's beverage industry after "taking" the French Danone shares, but now it finds that it has not really benefited, and the demand for the withdrawal of foreign shares is enough to explain.

The things that are "brought" are not satisfactory, and even the things that are "brought" are less than those that are "sent", are worth thinking about.

Such as treating hip-hop, Hallyu, and Western open-mindedness. We should take the essence of it, remove the dross, and practice the doctrine of taking it.

Take-it-or-leave-itIn real life, like us, China, bought Russian Su-27 fighters, modified them, and became oursJ-11It is a good example of the doctrine of taking it, and like our reform and opening up, we have taken a lot of advanced management experience from the West.

Literary scholarLu XunThrough the form of laughter, anger and witty language, it expresses an idea of attacking current politics and challenging power, and an essay with the courage to analyze culture and gain insight into history. We have made great strides with our own judgment and their technical experience, and this is the take-it-or-leave-it-or-leave-it doctrine.

The origin of the doctrine

It has always been the so-called "retreatism", and if you don't go, others are not allowed to come. Since the guns broke the gate, they hit a bunch of nails, and now, everything is "send-offism". Not to mention anything else, just for the study of art, I recently sent a batch of antiques to Paris for exhibition.

But in the end, "I don't know what will happen next"; There are also several "masters" holding a few old paintings and new paintings, hanging all the way through European countries, called "carrying forward the glory of the country."

I heard that Mei Lanfang will be sent not far away.

The Wise Men went to the Soviet Union in order to promote "symbolism, and thereafter to preach in Europe."

I don't want to discuss the relationship between Dr. May's acting and symbolism here, but in short, the replacement of antiques by living people can be regarded as a little progress, I dare say.

China bought Russian Su-27 fighters, modified them, and became our J-11, whose performance is better than blue.

Like our reform and opening up, we have brought a lot of advanced management experience from the West, and we have made great progress by relying on our own judgment and their technical experience.

There is also a huge difference between the "take-it-or-leave-it" approach to Western culture and the "take-or-leave-it" approach to traditional culture. For traditional culture, if you want to take it, there will generally be no obstacles, at most discuss it, is it good to take it? Is it suitable for modern times?

Moreover, for the traditional "take", it is basically free, and there is no "buying" or "sending".However, with regard to Western culture, we have found that certain things that we urgently need are indeed useful and good things, and we are very eager to "take them", and we are even willing to spend a lot of money to completely fulfill the "buy-it-ism", and the West is not yet willing, let's say high-tech, which seems to be called "rejectionism".Therefore, for the "take-it-or-leave-it" doctrine of Western culture, in addition to having brains and vision, and choosing to "take", we should not be too wishful thinking, thinking that as long as we want to "take", others will be willing to give; Thinking that if we want to buy it, others will want to sell it.

There are already too many facts that tell us that there are some things that we desire to "take", but are rejected, and simply "cannot be taken" or "cannot be bought"; And many things that we don't want and don't need, the West is constantly "sending".

When we accept the attitude that the West also needs to be objective and dispassionate, we will also encounter a problem. What to take? What should not be taken?

Why can't you take it? When we are faced with these problems, we say that we need to have a mind and a vision, but what kind of mind should we have? What kind of vision do you have?

When our minds and visions are all taught by the West, all of them have been brainwashed by the West, and all of us have exactly the same ideas and visions as the West, isn't our "taking" equivalent to "sending" from the West or "buying" what the West hopes?Therefore, if we can use Western culture as a reference to judge how traditional culture is "taken", then we also need to use traditional culture as a reference to how to "take" and "buy" Western culture, and at the same time, we also need to use Chinese reality as a reference. This should be the attitude of modern Chinese towards "take-it-ism".