Students pay 4,500 yuan for accommodation but move into a 12 person room, is it a temporary transiti

The Xi'an college has made it extremely wrong to let students live in 12-person rooms, whether it is stealing beams or temporary transitions, because students pay up to 4,500 yuan a year for accommodation, which is completely possible to rent a single room outside, but they still choose to live on campus. They will choose a four-person room because they hope that there will be fewer people living in it, and their dormitory problems can be reduced, but the school will let these people with higher tuition fees live in the worst dormitory due to financial or other problems. Although this approach is somewhat unreasonable, the school should still choose the most appropriate way to solve this problem, either give this group of students an exit fee or let them live in a four-person room.

The maximum accommodation in colleges and universities is 8 people, and some students will choose to live in a 4-person room with a higher accommodation fee in order to reduce the number of people in the dormitory. These students paid a high dormitory fee of 4,500 yuan, hoping to live in a four-person room, but the school did not consult with the group of students and asked them if they would like to live in a 12-person room. If the student agrees, then they should be refunded the dormitory fee, because the accommodation fee for a 12-person room is not the same as that for a 4-person room, and the school does not do the right thing with a high fee, which is detrimental to the reputation of the school.

If a student does not agree to live in a 12-person room, the school should not force the student to live in a 12-person room, but should find a way to reconcile the student who wants to live in a four-person room. There are 12 large rooms, the dormitory environment is not necessarily too good, and living in the same dormitory will make the dormitory look more cramped, which is not good for the students' school experience, so this institution's approach is completely wrong. <>

The school's unauthorized placement of students in 12 rooms without prior consultation is a practice of stealing beams and changing pillars. If the school informs the students in advance that there is no 4-person room, and the students make do with the 12-person room first, then it can be regarded as a temporary transition. Therefore, there is no doubt that the school's behavior is the same as the joist, and the school also needs to give students a reasonable solution, so that they can choose whether to live in a 4-person room or a 12-person room, and be prepared to refund the accommodation fee.

The accommodation fee of 4,500 yuan is really sky-high for students from working-class families, and whether it is a temporary transition or a stealing pillar, you must ask the school for the reason.

I think it's a temporary transition, and then it will definitely be assigned, which will affect the children's rest, which is particularly bad, and it will also affect the children's learning situation.