Is the New Forester s boxer engine and full time 4WD good? Is it cost effective?

I am the owner of the Subaru New Forester Premium Edition, and I often have friends who ask me why I don't add some money to buy an X1 or Q3 to drive it when I am almost 300,000, and I think my Subaru brand is still relatively niche. In fact, I think this is its characteristic, I think this I believe that most Subaru owners have proudly shown off to their friends the horizontally opposed engine and symmetrical full-time four-wheel drive system on the car, the former not only saves space in the engine compartment, but also makes the center of gravity of the body lower, with the symmetrical full-time four-wheel drive system, to get better handling. The New Forester has the smoothness of a car on the normal highway, and it also has the passing level of an SUV on the ice and snow road or in the field, and the cost performance is far stronger than the "face car" that relies on the brand effect to support sales.

I think the two core advantages of Subaru are the horizontally opposed engine and the symmetrical full-time four-wheel drive, which can get a better handling feeling and stability, and the cost performance is not bad.

Needless to say, the horizontally opposed engine, there are many kinds of full-time four-wheel drive systems of the forester, the performance difference is huge, the high-profile off-road ability is strong, and the low-profile can only walk on ordinary gravel roads.

The cost performance is OK, the performance is very good in all aspects, and the minimum configuration of less than 30W is OK.

In fact, Subaru's real classic four-wheel drive is DCCD, Subaru uses horizontally opposed engines and DCCD full-time four-wheel drive, galloping on the WRC track to kill all sides, Subaru innovatively integrates the gearbox, transfer case and front differential, the front differential is a spiral limited-slip differential, the middle differential is a multi-plate clutch, and the rear differential is a Torsen differential.

The current Forester uses the AC-4 active torque full-time four-wheel drive, which is much simplified compared with the DCCD, and the ** differential is still an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch, simplifying the spiral limited-slip differential in the front and the Torsen differential in the rear. Although the front and rear limited-slip differentials have been simplified, the multi-plate clutch as a ** differential has been retained.

Generally speaking, the longitudinal engine layout is easy to achieve the front and rear distribution of power, the distribution efficiency is very high, from the four-wheel drive structure, the power output of the longitudinal engine to the gearbox, directly into the differential, after the differential distribution and then into the front axle and rear axle respectively, forming the effect of "one in and two out".

It's great, I don't know what it's like to hear people say it's true. If you have the opportunity to open it yourself, you will know what it feels like. Just tell you that it's great, anyone who has driven a Subaru knows it.

Full-time four-wheel drive plus horizontally opposed engine, some people say that Subaru is a miracle in four-cylinder cars, because Impreza is indeed "very fierce and fierce" said so much, in fact, it is a sentence, Subaru is a good car, worth buying!!

How is the 4WD performance of the Subaru Forester? Drive to the snowy mountains and take a turn, and you will have a number in your heart.

The biggest difference between the two four-wheel drives is: the Forester is a full-time four-wheel drive based on a longitudinal engine layout, while the EVO is a full-time four-wheel drive based on a transverse engine layout, and the Mitsubishi Evo's full-time four-wheel drive is actual. It is a rare true full-time all-wheel drive in a transverse engine layout.

Many cars call themselves full-time four-wheel drive, with an all-wheel drive behind the hips, but in fact, many full-time four-wheel drives are not on the same level in terms of power response or power distribution efficiency as nominal all-wheel drive and true full-time four-wheel drive. The Subaru Forester's cash four-wheel drive is the ACT-4. In fact, Subaru's truly classic four-wheel drive is the DCCD.

Subaru uses a boxer-opposed engine and DCCD full-time four-wheel drive to remove all obstacles from the WRC track. Subaru innovatively integrates a gearbox, transfer case and front differential. The front differential is a spiral limited-slip differential, the middle differential is a multi-plate clutch, and the rear differential is a Torsen differential that works with the VDC vehicle electronic control system to eliminate all sides on the WRC track.

The Cash Forester uses ACT-4 active torque full-time four-wheel drive, which is much simpler than the DCCD. **The differential is still an electronically controlled, multi-plate clutch that simplifies the spiral limited-slip differential at the front and the Thomson differential at the rear. Although the front and rear limited-slip differentials have been simplified, the multi-plate clutch as a ** differential has been retained.

In general, the longitudinal engine layout is easy to achieve front and rear power distribution, and the distribution efficiency is very high. From the point of view of the four-wheel drive structure, the power output of the longitudinal engine is sent to the gearbox directly into the differential, and then after the differential is distributed, it enters the front axle and the rear axle respectively, forming a "one in and two out" effect, the power distribution ratio between the front axle and the rear axle of the Subaru Forester is usually between 10% and 50%, and in extreme cases, an additional 25% of the power can be distributed.

Yes; The four-wheel drive of the Subaru Forester is an AC-4 active torque full-time four-wheel drive, ** differential multi-plate clutch is retained, and the power output of the seated engine is transferred to the gearbox, directly into the medium-pressure differential distribution, and then into the front and rear axles respectively.

It's a true full-time four-wheel drive, because this car has a full-time four-wheel drive with an engine layout, and there is an AWD logo on the back.

Yes, the torque distribution of this system is more timely, and the torque of the average 4 tires during driving is more even, and there will be no idling and torque imbalance leading to sideslip and rollover.

True full-time four-wheel drive, because this car has a full-time four-wheel drive layout with an AWD mark on the back.

It's really strong because the performance of this car is great, the engine is great, there is a lot of power, and the comfort of this car is also very good, and this car is very fuel-efficient, so I think it is really strong.

Yes; Because the power of this engine is relatively good, the position of this engine can allow the mass to be evenly distributed, and some sports can be done repeatedly.

Really, because this car uses a horizontally opposed engine, the piston will be greatly less restricted, so the engine function will be very strong.

Particularly strong; The tight arrangement and round-trip pistons make it particularly mechanically efficient, and the power response is relatively fast, which is particularly energy-saving.

It's a pity that it's not the displacement, and the sharp acceleration is worse.

The Subaru Forever is equipped with a full-time all-wheel drive system.

The all-new Subaru Forever was launched in September 2019. The company will launch six models with a price range of 10,000 yuan. The new generation of Eternity Hybrids is equipped with a full-time all-wheel drive system, which is also the fifth generation of Eternity.

The car is based on Subaru's latest SGP global modular platform and is powered by a state-of-the-art horizontally opposed engine. At the same time, it also provides high-tech configurations such as Eyesight driving assistance system, X-Mode four-wheel drive key increase Wang Qiang system, etc. Compared to the previous generation, the new model has been significantly improved.

The car also has a DriverFocus driver monitoring feature. Before the driver starts, the driver's identity information that it can identify will be pre-stored in the seat, air adjustment, etc. This configuration can also alert the driver if they are distracted or fatigued while driving the car.

In terms of power, the Forester is equipped with a four-cylinder boxer engine with the latest technology. This engine has a maximum power of 145 hp and a maximum torque of 188 Nm. The overall performance of this car is still very good.

Millions of car purchase subsidies.

Yes; This is because the engine of this car is very powerful, using full-time four-wheel drive, the speed is very fast, the power system is very sufficient, and the performance is also very stable.

Yes; Because this car is based on the engine's full-time four-wheel drive, the distribution of power is very efficient, and the power is relatively sufficient.

Yes, because this car has a longitudinal engine layout. And the rear half of the car has front-wheel drive.

Summary. Subaru Forester's engine is relatively stable in terms of performance. He will not have much problem running this 15 200,000 kilometers normally, and it will have this gearbox.

It is also relatively stable in terms of performance. Moreover, the body chassis suspension of his vehicle is also relatively strong, and the four-zone system is also relatively strong. If he uses it normally, there is not much of a problem with this, that is, his engine, this fuel consumption is slightly higher, and other aspects are still good.

Hello, I have seen your inquiry, please wait for a moment and answer it for you immediately.

Hello, I'm helping you sort out the answer to the question, please wait a while Oh dear, this question is up to me, it takes a little time to type, please be patient, thank you!

If Subaru carries the engine of the Envy Forester, his performance is relatively stable. He will not have much problem running this 15 200,000 kilometers normally, and it will have this gearbox. It is also relatively stable in terms of performance.

Moreover, the chassis of his vehicle is relatively strong, and the four-zone system is also relatively strong. If he uses it normally, there is not much of a problem with this, that is, his engine, this fuel consumption is slightly higher, and other aspects are still good.

It can only be said that the forester four-wheel drive is enough, and the Q5 is better.

The Torsen differential used in Q5 usually distributes 40% of the front and 60% of the rear of the road power, and the Torsen differential will redistribute the power under special circumstances, with a maximum of 65% for the front wheels and a maximum of 85% for the rear wheels. The power distribution of the forest Outback is up to 50% of the front and rear, most of the usual road power is concentrated in the front wheels, and the power is increased in the rear wheels when needed, some data show that the rear wheel power is at least a little more than 10%, although the rear wheel power increases the response speed faster and more timely than the timely four-wheel drive, and can not be compared with the Q5, can only be compared with the Tiguan. The Tiguan is also known as a full-time four-wheel drive, with a minimum of 10% power at the rear wheels, but in most cases the Tiguan is 10% at the rear wheels, but the Forester will adjust between 10% and 30%, which is the advantage of ACT4.

Then there is the chassis, the Q5 front suspension-like double wishbone 5-link structure, the Forester is the simplest MacPherson. This gap is not small, of course, if you don't talk about quality, you can run, that's the same. The chassis is strong and useful for off-roading.

The advantage of the forester is that the chassis is high, and sometimes a chassis can top all kinds of four-wheel drive. However, it should be noted that the ground clearance of the forester is 220 is unloaded, and the Q5 185 is fully loaded. I once had a post speculating that the Forester Full Load was 190.

However, the disadvantage of the high chassis is that it is unstable at high speed, and it is easy to roll over when cornering. Subaru's boxer-opposed engine lowers the center of gravity, which means that it can maintain the same stability with increased ground clearance, but there is no data on how much it can be improved.