How strong is India, and how strong is India s military strength?

Upstairs must be Indian, according to the data I have, I am afraid that India is not able to be on par with China at present, the world often loves to talk about India because your country is second only to China's demographic dividend country, and this trend will have more than China's situation, India's richest man alone swallowed 35% of India's GDP, this is a highlight of the time, India's rich list is 2 times more than China's rich assets, India has the world's largest refugee camp, Mumbai, India's largest city, is 100 kilometers away from the suburbs of the city, there are world-famous refugee camps, you can see refugee camps everywhere along the way, India is the country that employs the most child labor in the world, but I also appreciate India's jewelry processing, railway accidents make India's face often colorful, India's service outsourcing software is India's first foreign exchange **. As far as I know, the total output value of China's service outsourcing exports is nearly 20 times that of India, India is more scarce than China's mineral resources, many people in India's refugee camps do not even have a hukou, let alone housing, China's cement consumption is the world's total use of the general more, the production of steel is the sum of the world's 3rd to 11th, China's daily necessities almost monopolize the entire market on the African continent, so for the time being, India can not be compared with China, People often say that India is because India's demographic dividend will surpass China's, so I believe that India will be the star of tomorrow, but today it is obviously not, what I said is not true, you can go to India to feel it for yourself.

Bourgeois democracy** Most of them are miserable, the political environment is "democratic", lz, don't be deceived by online messages, India's military is very weak, and China is not on the same level [except for the navy], but his navy is only stronger than ours, and it is inferior to Japan in the world.

In terms of the current state of troops, India is by no means inferior to China and Pakistan. If you look at it by arms, its naval strength is particularly prominent. India has always harbored the ambition to become the hegemon of the Indian Ocean, and its power in the Indian Ocean is second only to the United States.

The Army is its main force, 900,000 of its 1.3 million troops, and India has a tactical advantage in both the number of troops stationed in the disputed region of southern Tibet, and can quickly adjust from peacetime to wartime.

In terms of the Air Force, India has purchased advanced equipment from all over the world, and its strength is not inferior to that of other countries except for the US military.

India also has some disadvantages.

First, its defense base industry capacity is average. **There are many imports, but the digestion and integration ability is not strong. Its localization rate is not only lower than that of China, but also far lower than that of most major military powers such as the United States, Russia, Britain, and France. This means that its sustainable combat capability in wartime is not high.

Second, because India's ** is imported from all over the world, it is not standardized enough, and the pressure on the logistics department is also relatively large.

Thirdly, India is known to have a poor infrastructure, and therefore a poor ability to mobilize troops across the country.

India is in the early stages of industrialization. The general view is that China is based on manufacturing, while India is based on software and services. In fact, in recent years, India has been emphasizing the importance of industrialization, such as building high-speed railways across the country and improving the level of industrial manufacturing.

They have realized that the first pot of gold can be mined from software, but industrialization is the way to become a strong country.

The fourth in the world in terms of scale, the eighth in the world in terms of strength, and the second rate in the world in terms of combat effectiveness! It can't be compared with the five constants, and neither can Germany, Israel, Japan, and South Korea...It is close to the level of Turkey, North Korea, Iraq, and Vietnam, and the equipment is close to Turkey, and it is much more advanced than North Korea, Iraq, and Vietnam, and the willpower and perseverance of the soldiers are poor, and it cannot be compared with the North Korea! ! Something like that...

India's independent research and development capabilities are not a little bit of a poor source, and the equipment relies on imports. India is rich and absolutely right, but anyone who has a little brain knows the importance of people's livelihood. It's ridiculous that India has done such a basic project as a railway and medical care (I've seen their "hanging ticket") and invested money in the development of the military.

And taking a step back, even if India spends a lot of money on **advanced**, their sustainability will be quite poor, and you can think about what happened to Qin Shi Huang's forced taxation and compulsory military service. India is still poor in many parts of the country, and overall population pressure is much greater than in China.

India cannot afford to fight a war, Pakistan alone and India have not dared to move for so many years, and China's military strength will absolutely crush India.

In terms of equipment and personnel size, it can reach the top five, but after considering the quality of personnel and other aspects, it is about ten.

Why do Indians always think that China is lagging behind India? In the interview, the reporter found the answer.

If Indians think they are stronger than China, they should not be Indians, and they are Indians. Most people have never been to China, they watch the news**, and they know that no matter what they say. The Indian press, like other countries, is ostensibly free but in fact controlled.

** In order to give the people a kind of influence, they deceive the people. In actual comparison, India's equipment and facilities have not been compared with China at all.

This is the same reason as when we said before the reopening, the West is all slums and lives in dire straits.

Can you still organize the third brother's brain hole?

The above answer can be ignored Landlord India is indeed a behemoth compared to small countries in East Asia But for China, it can only be a stupid cow First to the military speaking: India's domestically produced Arjun tank spent countless manpower and material resources As a result, when it is ready for mass production, their own army is unwilling to use it, and our country's Type 99 can penetrate the armor of any existing tank head-on The comprehensive performance is world-class India's so-called domestic aircraft 70% of the parts need to be imported It is completely assembled and our J-10B It can be swept in Asia, not to mention the J-20, and the aircraft carrier is overhauled in three days and repaired in five days, and their main battle equipment is imported and one is less than one As for combat capability, the original border guards beat their trump cards, not to mention the main field army In addition to being a nuclear country, conventional military power, our country can absolutely suppress India Economically: Many people think that India's software industry is very powerful, but in fact, this is a misunderstanding They do outsourcing products There are very few products with independent intellectual property rights There are very few processing bases in disguise At present, China's strength in IT has far surpassed that of India, and its industry is even more tangled, their basic industry is very weak, and many parts and equipment are imported, but they have a thin foundation, but they like to strive for high and new technology, resulting in top-heavy, and even motorcycles cannot be completely domestically produced, but they spend a lot of money to engage in aerospace Social system:

India is the only big country with a hierarchical system at the moment, which is what everyone knows, and there is a distinction between superior and inferior people, and it is almost impossible for inferior people to enter the upper society, and their fate is determined by their surname, and in this regard, just throwing a small flame into it can cause internal chaos in them, so India can only act as a pawn of certain forces to contain China, and they want to single out China, and they are not qualified to do so.

India is indeed very strong, but it is still between the second and third batches in the world. The first group consists only of the United States, Russia and China. China and India, if they fight a very limited local battle, whoever strikes first will take advantage; If a local war is fought with limited practice, space, and scale, it may end in a draw; If a local war is fought with a limited purpose, India is not an adversary; If there is a full-scale war, India will become a colony.

The main reason is that the Indians will only buy them, and they will create few of them, and they will be miserable in wartime In an accurate comparison, India's land, sea, and air missiles are not China's opponents. The world's more reasonable all-out war power ranking is as follows: the United States, China, Russia, France, India, Britain, Japan, Germany, Italy, Pakistan. Adopt it.

India is also not strong, in fact, India and neighboring countries have never lost, there is actual combat experience, including 62 years, the Sino-Indian war, India lost face but picked up plums, who led the fight, GD did not dare to fight, because they were afraid that they could not control the situation, the people must not laugh at India, sit in the well and watch the sky.

India's real military strength: It has so far maintained the first place in the world of three places, and the United States cannot match it.

The reason for India's military strength is the same as China's, from more than a billion people. This means that in the event of a full-scale war, there is an almost infinite supply of troops, and no country dares to afford to confront them head-on.