The girl was bitten by a dog, and her mother was beaten by the dog s owner, what the hell happened?

A girl in Xiangfang District, Harbin was bitten by a teddy who was not tied to a dog leash, and the girl's mother looked for a couple to walk the dog, but was injured by the male owner instead, and the hostess of the dog was inconsequentially teasing the dog, and the man's behavior caused the anger of onlookers, and then called the police.

After the little girl was bitten, the girl's mother stepped forward to find the dog owner's theory and was also beaten by the dog owner, and now the dog owner has been taken away for investigation, and the specific situation is not known how to solve it.

It is understood that it is because after the girl was bitten, the mother reasoned with the dog owner, and the dog owner refused to apologize and spoke badly, and even started to beat people.

The girl was bitten by a dog, and the mother naturally wanted to protect her daughter, so she quarreled with the dog owner, but was beaten by the dog owner.

The girl was bitten by a dog on the road, and her mother went to the dog owner to reason and ask for compensation, but the dog owner not only did not listen, but also started beating people.

The dog was not leashed and bit the girl, but her mother was beaten by the dog owner after theorizing with the dog owner.

In general, there are many reasons why this happens, either the dog has a rabies episode. Either it's the master. him off.

Because the dog bit the woman, the woman had the owner of the dog when she was angry, so the woman had such a cry.

The dog owner and the woman bite each other because they are fighting, which leads to dissatisfaction. It's a little crazy, but it's unreasonable.

It can be said that it is very cruel. What this woman did was incorrect, and her rights and interests should be defended through reasonable means.

This is the so-called tooth for tooth, she is also forced to do such an act, and she also wants the dog owner to experience the taste of being bitten, I have to say that it is really ruthless.

Personally, I think that such an act of getting rich really shows that this woman is a ruthless person, and can do such a thing, crazy like a dog.

In fact, such behavior has lost its mind, and it does not benefit either party.

Because this dog is very loyal to his owner, because the child is in danger, so he bites him.

In fact, this dog bites the child to protect the child.

Maybe this dog was bitten by a girl for another reason, and it wasn't intentional.

Maybe the dog just likes the child, and doesn't really bite the child.

It may be that the woman found out that the dog did not come to bite the child for no reason, and it may be to protect the child.

This big yellow dog wants to pull this child out, because ** is coming.

It may be that the woman misunderstood the dog, and the dog is man's best friend.

It is estimated that it is to save the child's life, after all, the dog is still very kind.

It depends on why the dog was bitten and whether the other party has fulfilled their responsibilities.

Tort Law.

Article 78: Where raised animals cause harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability, but where it can be proved that the harm was caused by the infringed party's intentional or gross negligence, responsibility may not be borne or mitigated.

Article 79: Where management provisions are violated by failing to take safety measures against animals and causing damage to others' spikes, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability.

Article 80: Where fierce dogs and other dangerous animals that are prohibited from raising cause harm to others, the animal keeper or the person in charge of the animal shall bear tort liability.

Article 81: Where zoo animals cause harm to others, the zoo shall bear tort liability, but where it can be proved that it has fulfilled its management duties, it shall not be liable.

Article 82: Where abandoned or escaped animals cause harm to others during the period of abandonment or escape, the original animal keeper or manager bears tort liability.

Article 83: Where an animal causes harm to others due to a third party's fault, the infringed party may request compensation from the animal keeper or manager, and may also request compensation from the third party. After the animal keeper or manager makes compensation, he or she has the right to recover compensation from a third party.

Article 84: Raising animals shall abide by the law, respect social morality, and must not interfere with the lives of others.

It depends on the hospital's assessment of the little girl's injuries whether they are minor or severe. If the harmful result is more than a minor injury, criminal responsibility can be pursued in accordance with the law. According to Article 234 of the Criminal Law, whoever intentionally injures another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance.

Whoever commits the crime described in the preceding paragraph and causes serious injury shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

For the crime of intentional injury, sentencing is based on the results of the evaluation of the injuries, and civil compensation is generally required.

What the heck?? The dog owner bit off the girl's ear???

There is only moral condemnation, and there is no punishment for crimes.