-
In this case, the person who vomits should bear the tort liability, and if the property management is at fault (such as failure to clean in time, lighting failure, etc.), the property management should also bear the tort liability. At the same time, the self-safety protection of the injured person is not in place, there is a causal relationship between vomiting and falling, but it is not an absolute or inevitable relationship, and other pedestrians have not fallen or caused damage when their self-protection is in place. Therefore, this case needs to be resolved through reasonable and reasonable negotiation, and each party shares part of the responsibility, and it is obviously unfair for the injured party to bear the full loss.
This is only a causal relationship, not damage caused by intentional injury or subjective wrongdoing, and the injured person himself has the problem of inadequate self-security.
-
There is definitely a need to be responsible. Of course, if you can find out who the owner of this vomit is? Be able to prove a causal relationship.
And you can also find it. The property management office of the community. Make a claim.
Because of the property management of the community, he did not fulfill the obligation of cleaning the corridor and maintaining public facilities. Within the scope of his fault, he can bear part of the liability.
-
Vomiting something in the corridor causes others to fall and injure themselves, of course, you have to be responsible. You need to know who vomited before you can solve the problem. If the person doesn't admit it, it's not good to solve the problem.
If your mother falls too badly and is injured, you can call the police, please help solve the problem. If the fall is minor and the vomiting person can be found, a private negotiation will be resolved.
-
Yes, because the vomit produced by vomiting has an impact on the access of others, and the victim falls and is injured by avoiding or accidentally stepping on and slipping, in the final analysis, it is also caused by vomit, and the perpetrator of vomit needs to bear certain responsibility.
-
You should be responsible, after all, it is because of your vomiting that someone else fell and injured themselves. And the corridor in his own community should have been cleaned up by himself. It's impossible to take a little responsibility.
-
It is because the vomit caused the person to fall and injure the person should be responsible, but the property is also jointly and severally liable, because the property cleaner did not find out and clean it in time, so the person was injured by the fall.
-
To be responsible, failure to clean up the vomit in time, causing others to be injured, is to bear a certain responsibility.
-
There is a certain amount of responsibility, the community is everyone's home, if you vomit in your own home, do you have to clean it up, this because you vomit and did not clean it up in time, causing others to fall and injure, a little conscience knows that it is their own responsibility.
-
You have to be responsible! You must be responsible for the injuries caused by a fall caused by your own vomit! Because the main reason is the vomit!
-
The corridor in the community belongs to a public place, if you vomit, you have to clean up yourself, it stands to reason that you need to be responsible, but if the other party does not cooperate, it may be more difficult to do, causing such consequences, you should be responsible!
-
If someone vomits into the hallway and slips and falls, the property is responsible. The responsibility lies with the failure to clean the property in a timely manner and to set up warning signs for the fall.
And this person who vomits has no public morality, and the person who walks does not pay attention to safety, and he has to bear the main responsibility.
-
This person does not think that he needs to be responsible, if he has accepted the trial morally and his conscience is not good, he can go to visit, he does not need to bear any responsibility, his personal opinion is for reference only, you can also ask a lawyer.
-
It stands to reason that you need to be responsible, but if the other party does not cooperate, it may be more difficult.
-
Of course, you need to be responsible, and in this case, you have the main responsibility
-
People who vomit may not remember this incident, ask the property cleaning staff, why don't they clean up? Causing pedestrians to fall and injure themselves. People who vomit, pedestrians, and properties are all responsible, and they are all responsible.
-
If the person who vomits is injured by a fall, the person who vomited should be responsible.
-
The corridor in the community belongs to a public place, if you vomit, you have to clean up by yourself, causing such consequences, you should be responsible!
-
It stands to reason that you have to be responsible, but it is more difficult to obtain evidence.
-
I took off the corridor in the community, and later. You have to clean up with your family, not your family, and after you see it, you have to clean it up in time. If you don't clean it up, that's your business.
Causing others to slip after being deducted, are you your business? But after you leave, your family will definitely know that you are wrong, so why not go and find it? This is definitely your responsibility.
-
Then after you vomit in the corridor in the community, causing someone to fall and injure yourself, you have to be responsible for this, because you are equivalent to causing him to slip and fall, and you are in charge.
-
The corridor of the community is a public place, and if you vomit, you have to clean it up yourself. If such a consequence is caused, you should be responsible, and even if it ends up in court, you are the one who is at fault. If the amount of compensation demanded by the other party is too large, you can also go to court.
-
Of course, you should be responsible for causing others to wrestle, and you should have asked your family to clean it up in time.
-
Should I be responsible for throwing up in the corridor of the community and causing others to fall and injure myself? This thing for you. Definitely responsible. It's about you.
-
Yes, but it's a bit difficult to find this person and prove that the fall is related to it
-
This should be compensated even from a moral point of view.
-
After spitting up, you can clean it up, pay attention to hygiene, reduce diseases, and improve your health.
-
Do you want to see if you vomit in ten cases?
-
Legal analysis: According to the provisions of the property service section or the Ming service contract, if the death of the community falling from the building is related to the damage to the personal and property safety of the owner due to improper property protection measures, the corresponding legal responsibility shall be borne in accordance with the law.
Where property management enterprises hire security personnel, they shall comply with relevant state provisions. When maintaining public order in the property management area, security personnel shall perform their duties and shall not infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of citizens.
Legal basis: "Property Management Regulations" Article 5 The construction administrative department is responsible for the supervision and management of national property management activities. The administrative departments of local people's real estate groups at or above the county level are responsible for the supervision and management of property management activities within their respective administrative areas.
Article 1254 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China prohibits throwing objects from buildings. Where objects thrown from a building or objects falling from a building cause damage to others, the infringer shall bear tort liability in accordance with law; Where it is difficult to determine the specific infringer after investigation, the user of the building who may have caused the harm shall compensate unless it can be proved that he is not the infringer. The user of the building who may have caused the harm has the right to recover compensation from the infringer after compensation.
Property management enterprises and other building managers shall take necessary security measures to prevent the occurrence of the circumstances provided for in the preceding paragraph; Where necessary security measures are not employed, tort liability for failure to perform security obligations shall be borne in accordance with law. Where the circumstances provided for in the first paragraph of this article occur, the public security and other organs shall promptly investigate in accordance with law and find out who is responsible.
-
Summary. Dear, hello, I am happy to serve you Outsiders are not responsible for falling from the property in the community, which belongs to the victim's self-dangerous behavior, the property is not responsible for the negligence of the community, and it is necessary to bear part of the responsibility, and there is no need to bear it.
Dear, hello, I am happy to serve you Outsiders in the community fall property has no responsibility, this belongs to the victim's self-risk behavior, the property has no responsibility for the community is at fault, to bear a wide responsibility for the letter of caution, no need to bear.
In the event of a fall in the community, the property cannot prove that it is not at fault, and it is responsible. The property shall assist in the investigation of the falling incident, and may choose to call the police if necessary. If it is difficult to determine the specific infringer for the damage caused by the falling incident, the user of the building who may have caused the harm shall give compensation, and the residents of the floor involved shall be jointly and severally liable for compensation.
Article 1254 of the Code of Civil Landslides prohibits throwing objects from buildings. Where objects thrown from a building or objects falling from a building cause damage to others, the infringer shall bear tort liability in accordance with law; Where it is difficult to determine the specific infringer after investigation, the user of the building who may have caused the harm shall compensate the building user who may have caused the harm, unless he can prove that he is not the infringer. The user of the building who may have caused the harm has the right to recover compensation from the infringer after compensation.
Property management enterprises and other building managers shall take necessary security measures to prevent the occurrence of the circumstances provided for in the preceding paragraph;
-
Legal basis: Article 1258 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Heng Kuxiang Article 1258 Where the excavation, repair or installation of underground facilities in a public place or on a road causes damage to others, and the builder cannot prove that it has set up obvious signs and taken safety measures, it shall bear tort liability.
If underground facilities such as manholes cause damage to others, and the manager cannot prove that he has fulfilled his management duties, he shall bear tort liability.
Shenzhen Special Economic Zone Smoking Control Regulations" Penalty Measures: >>>More
If there is no one at home, his valve should be open, because he must normally attack the water to this user, he can charge it, if the user does not want to use the water, it has a valve indoors.
The cost of the residential corridor light is paid by the property, because it is the cost of public facilities, and it should be charged by the property management company to bear the electricity bill of the residential corridor lamp.
You are the property manager of the community, found that the corridor lights in the community, after 5 hours, there will be empty and total opening tripping, it is recommended that you replace the voice-activated lights, as long as there is a sound to turn on, no sound to turn off, which will be more energy-saving.
The size of your community, the grade of the permanent residents, and the existing stores, you can do whatever you lack. >>>More