Why is where you came from in Go back where you came from a place like subordinate and not an object

whereyou

camefrom is a place adverbial clause, which modifies the predicate go.

If it is an object clause, then to cannot be omitted, because to does the infinitive component of go, not where

youcame

Ingredients in from.

v- is the antecedent w- is the introductory word, the sentence is from is the preposition, and it must be followed by the object, and its object is the v-. There is also an adverbial clause that is very similar to it, I translate the sentence you said into an adverbial clause, and you can know how to distinguish them from the two clauses by comparing them yourself, go back to the village where you came from thereThe latter there is the object of from, and the whole sentence of the following where explains the village.

A definite clause is a sentence that is used to modify a predecessor, here it is a villige antecedent, and a where lead sentence is a sentence that modifies the word villige. Translates to go back to the country where you came from.

It is not a definite subordinate, this is a place adverbial clause. If it is a definite subordinate, there is no need for the preposition from.

Come back from the meaning of coming back from somewhere, there is no such usage as go back from!

Existence, the meaning is different, come is come and go

This preposition is to be omitted. Just go back where you come from. GO itself already has "go ... The meaning is directional, and can no longer be used to

The team will answer for you.

This is a definite clause. It is made up of two sentences. where= the place that, where is the leading word of the definite clause.

back to the place.

came from the place.

The two sentences put together are: go back to the place that you came fromChinese means: go back to where you came from.

where you come from is a clause, which is equivalent to someplace, so the preposition to be removed in front of it.

The object can be replaced with which or that, but can be replaced with: in which

where is a relational adverb, here it is not an object to do from, but an adverbial of place to do the phrasal verb come from.

It cannot be replaced, because where leads to the come from place adverbial at the end of the sentence.

No, because here where leads the place adverbial clause, you should have learned where do you come from ?This sentence, in fact, the clause here is the object of go back. Use where to ask the question

go back（ where） you came from.Although it should be go back (to where).

where leads a noun clause as a preposition to is an object clause, but when go back to followed by an object clause, the preposition can be omitted, just as hear of is followed by an object clause and the preposition is omitted.

from is a transitive verb, and reverting to normal is from where

Where adverb, not preposition to

You can only use where, not which that

There are two reasons for this:1In general, when where is used as a relative adverb to guide a definite clause, it is usually not preceded by a preposition because it is equivalent to "preposition + which" in its own sense. Such as:

this is the hotel where (=in / at which) they were staying.This is the hotel where they were staying.

she has a safe in her closet where (=in which) she keeps her jewelry.She has a safe in her closet to store her jewelry.

But sometimes we can also see the use of from where, in this case, because from is a special preposition, because it can sometimes be followed by a prepositional phrase as an object.

come out from under the table.Get out from under the table.

So, although the relative adverb where is equivalent in meaning to "preposition + which", sometimes the preposition from can also be used before where due to semantic needs. Such as:

we went up to the roof, from where we had a good view of the procession.We climbed up to the roof, from where it was nice to ** parade.

2.When the antecedent is a preposition + place noun instead of a single place noun, the leading word of the definite clause can only be from where.

Addendum: If there is a preposition from in the definite clause, and the antecedent is the object of from in the clause, the introductory word can use where, or which (the place noun can't).

The antecedent acts as the adverbial component of the main clause, and the leading word of the definite clause uses where

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask!

Both where and that are fine.

Where is limited to the use of location.

that is generic.

The easiest and most straightforward way to do this is to fill in where

where is an adverb and does not require to

If it's go back to the place where you come from, you need to use to.

where is an adverb, and if you add to, you add to it.

Where have you come from and where have you come from?

Will you give me the cup?

The old man lives alone.

He finally got home, tired and hungry.