What are the real things you have seen about the influence of zodiac signs on people s personalities

It's easy to be the kind of person you feel you are. For example, I'm a Gemini, and sometimes I'm a Cancer, but I feel more like a Gemini, so it's easy to put my behavior and thinking in the same way as Gemini should be, and then you will form this kind of mentality, "Eh, it's quite accurate, it seems like that" and then you have to feel that it's like this, and your personality will be subjectively and indirectly changed by yourself. If horoscopes can really change a person's personality, at least I haven't caught up with my Libra man.

In my opinion, in fact, constellations and the like are also studied by people, just like data statistics, there will be chances and differences if there are more. Remember, this is a human society. If you want to say natural influences, you can understand it this way, everyone's personality, hobbies, etc....After big data statistics, it is difficult to say that everyone will be classified, and similar people will appear.

But I can guarantee that there will not be exactly the same people in this world, at least not every same moment in the time period, even if you are different from you in the previous second, so sometimes your horoscope influence may just be the role of someone else.

Although I don't believe it, but carefully consider that the constellation is determined according to the date of birth, and the year is divided into 12 constellations equally, and the human pregnancy period is generally 40 weeks, if you look at it this way, can it be understood that the mother is conceived in different seasons and climates, and the impact of the first three months of embryonic development on the fetus, that is, different pregnancy periods, different climates, affect people's endocrine, affect the development of the fetal nervous system, and then affect people's innate temperament type. The above is just speculation.

When a person has a strong self-personality correction mechanism, those traits of horoscope theory induction will no longer affect the person's way of dealing with other people. Astrology is not something that needs to be believed, but only a tool to assist in observing and reasoning about the other person's personality, not to be an excuse for failing to do something. A relationship begins with mutual appreciation and ends with mutual hurt, so what happens in the middle is basically that both parties refuse to compromise with each other, and the more they go, the more tired ......they become

The horoscope is not necessarily right, just like that day the horoscope originally said that Gemini was my watch out for sign, but that day we didn't have contact for a long time but got in touch again. Of course, this reunion can be understood as both positive and negative, and if it can be understood in both ways, it is not the suggestive effect of the constellation, but the suggestive effect of the person.

It can only be said that sometimes the similarity of the constellation is just their own match, and the person's personality is mostly related to his family growth and acquired development, so the constellation can't really determine the personality, in fact, if you look back, each constellation has its own similarities, so don't take this kind of thing too seriously.

My Libra man and twin women will say that they are very compatible in the horoscope, but it is useless to break up in three months. If you don't love, you don't love. Long-term love is not about horoscopes, but about conflict handling and a little luck after being together.

The confluence of the three views is the best. So I think horoscope analysis is just a way to comfort yourself.

I think that the root of horoscopes, as a kind of psychological suggestion that can work, lies in the fact that everyone has the possibility to develop each personality or behavior. You can look at personalities outside of your zodiac sign and find a lot of similarities as well. So the love implied by the horoscope is possible, but the object of the implication may not necessarily be.