I m going to have a debate on the pros and cons of nuclear energy, I m the opposition, and I need a

Nuclear energy pollutes the environment and can be harmful to humans if used incorrectly.

I think we can draw an analogy between "nuclear energy" and "fire".

Fire, if not used well, can cause great disasters, and wild beasts are afraid of fire because they do not know how to use fire.

However, humans have mastered the knack of using fire, and thus have made human civilization possible.

A huge leap forward was made.

Just imagine, if human beings had not learned to use fire, would the current human beings be the masters of the earth?

It's the same with nuclear energy, and now people are afraid of nuclear, just like primitive people are afraid of fire, and think that it is extremely dangerous.

But we have reason to believe that the key now is:

Correctly grasp how to use it, and the correct way to limit it [This is very important, because if you know how to use it, you also need to know how to "prevent", if human beings don't know how to extinguish fire, they don't dare to use fire boldly; In the same way, if we do not know how to prevent nuclear hazards, human beings will not dare to use nuclear energy with confidence, just like now, many people have heard that nuclear power plants are going to be built.

Immediately think of nuclear radiation.

For example, exploring the universe and interstellar voyages, nuclear energy has more advantages than any energy source currently at the disposal of mankind.

If fire makes humans the masters of the Earth, then nuclear is likely to take us out of the Earth and become galaxies.

Juggernaut. We believe that if we know how to use and prevent, then nuclear can also bring a huge ......leap forward to human civilization like "fire".

The other side may take "nuclear weapons."

Speaking of things, this is not difficult to deal with:

For example, airplanes, which are used to carry people and goods, are very useful tools.

But some people use airplanes to make 911, do you say that airplanes do more harm than good?

Therefore, even if the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, deliberately using Yuntan to destroy it is a terrible thing ......

The key is to see "how to use it".

1. With the rapid development of science and technology, new energy is constantly emerging, and the current excessive investment in nuclear energy will become more headaches in the future! 2. The over-exploitation of nuclear energy will bring more severe challenges to China's security defense. Not only in the safety and security of the daily life of the people, but also in the safety protection during the special period!

3. As a world power, we should make greater contributions to the harmony of the world. We must be cautious about this act of destroying vegetation and destroying the environment, as well as bringing unstable factors to the world. 4. To prevent the same mistakes as Japan, instead of spending huge manpower and material resources to create energy, it is better to start from the overall situation and solve the problem from the root!

Against: Mankind should not use nuclear energy, which is huge, dangerous, and can bring great disasters to people. Over a period of 13 years, from 1944 to 1957, the Hanfuld No. 2 reactor in the Midwest of the United States leaked approximately 530,000 Curies of iodine-131 into the surrounding atmosphere.

Many of the residents in the vicinity have suffered from pancreatic diseases and even pancreatic cancer, and livestock have produced a large number of defective offspring. The 1954 hydrogen bomb test on Bikini exposed not only fishermen on hundreds of fishing boats, but also indigenous people on many nearby islands. Countless indigenous people died of radiation sickness over the next decade or so, and to make matters worse, most of their descendants suffered from severe physical defects.

On January 21, 1968, in the northwest of Greenland, four U.S. hydrogen bombs were over the island**, and many soldiers at the air base were severely radiated. Their skin is eaten away by cancer cells, and their offspring lose their ability to live. On August 29, 1949, an atomic bomb was launched over the Great Plain of Kazakhstan**.

The Soviet Union then conducted 320 atomic and hydrogen bomb tests there. In January 1965, an underground nuclear test 10 times the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb caused a large area of ground to collapse, creating a lake 400 meters wide and 800 meters long. Hundreds of underground nuclear tests have caused large areas of ground to collapse, creating lakes that are more than 5,000 meters long and wide.

The grasslands in this area have been polluted extensively, and the underground structures and ecosystems have been severely damaged. Herders have also been exposed to radiation, and some of their children are constantly developing new genetic diseases and physical defects. There are many similar examples, so I believe that mankind should not use nuclear energy.

Careful observation, good at asking questions, diligent in thinking.

Pros: 1Nuclear power generation does not emit huge amounts of pollutants into the atmosphere like fossil fuel power generation, so it does not cause air pollution.

2.Nuclear power generation does not produce carbon dioxide, which aggravates the global warming effect.

3.The uranium fuel used in nuclear power generation has no other purpose than to generate electricity.

4.The energy density of nuclear fuel is millions of times higher than that of fossil fuels, so the fuel used in nuclear power plants is small in size, easy to transport and store, and a 1,000 megawatt nuclear power plant only needs 30 metric tons of uranium fuel a year, which can be transported by plane on one flight.

5.The cost of nuclear power generation is less susceptible to international economic conditions, so the cost of power generation is more stable than that of other power generation methods.

Cons: 1Nuclear power plants produce high- and low-order radioactive waste, or used nuclear fuel, which is small in size, but because of the radioactivity, it must be handled carefully and face considerable political problems.

3.The investment cost of nuclear power plants is too high, and the financial risk of power companies is high.

4.Nuclear power plants are less suitable for peak and off-peak load-carrying operation.

5.The construction of nuclear power plants is more likely to lead to political disputes.

6.There are a large amount of radioactive materials in the reactors of nuclear power plants, which can cause harm to the ecology and people if they are released into the environment during an accident.