I m going to participate in the debate competition, and we re on the right side, and the topic is Th

Our view is that those who achieve great things are not informal. What does it mean to be "informal"? This is a very general concept, and in order to make the discussion more relevant, we naturally need to give a reasonable definition of it.

The term "informal" comes from the Book of the Later Han Dynasty and the Biography of Yu Yan, and the Commercial Press's interpretation is to describe treating people without sticking to small things and not being constrained by small things. Mostly refers to not paying attention to the small things in life. There are two words here that need to be paid special attention to by the opposing debater:

"Restraint" and "subsections". First of all, "detain" here means to be restrained, to describe being bound in. Obviously, not being rigid does not mean not paying attention and not complying.

Not bound to subsections, let us do things more broadly and flexibly. Secondly, "subsections" refer to trivial matters that have nothing to do with the overall situation, non-principled trivialities. Its extension is very wide, as small as the trivial things of life:

Dress and live; Big for self-interest: life and death. The great scientist Albert Einstein was unkempt all day long, which can be described as informal; The great writer Li Bai is uninhibited and uninhibited, which should be called informal; The great Comrade Lei Feng serves the people wholeheartedly, does not care about his own interests, and is even more informal!

In addition, "subsections" are not the same as "details", which are the elements that make up things and are indispensable. Subsections are the secondary contradiction in the development of things, and to grasp the development of things, we should look at the direction and mainstream.

So, why don't those who achieve great things be informal? We believe there are three reasons for this:

First, from the perspective of the main characteristics of "those who have achieved great things". Those who have achieved great things are by no means ordinary talents. He must have made outstanding achievements in a certain field and had a large and lasting positive impact on society.

Looking at the people who have achieved great things in ancient and modern times, we can find their common characteristics: (1) have a long-term vision, and have keen insight and foresight into the development of things; (2) They are good at grasping the main contradictions of things, can clarify the status and role of "subsections", and will not stick to unprincipled trivial matters; (3) Those who achieve great things often have unique personalities and are not informal. Comrade Xiaoping's thought on talent is mentioned:

It is necessary to employ people on the basis of merit and ...... not informalIncluding some people with strange tempers (*** Anthology Volume II), which objectively affirms the relationship between talent and informality.

Second, analyze from a realistic perspective. People's energy is limited, and if you want to achieve great things, you must have insight into the direction and grasp the overall situation. As the saying goes, it will be the top of the mountain, and the mountains will be small at a glance.

Only when there are no distractions can we concentrate. If you stick to small sections, put your energy and time too much on non-principled trivial matters, and "grab your eyebrows and mustaches", it will inevitably hinder the success of big things.

Third, from the theoretical level, the contradictions of things can be divided into main contradictions and secondary contradictions, and the "direction" and "overall situation" are the main contradictions of things, which play a leading role in the development of things; The "subsection" is a secondary contradiction. We cannot deal with problems at the expense of the basics.

It is important to know that while the main contradiction is resolved, the secondary contradiction can also be easily solved. To sum up the above three points, we unanimously agree: those who achieve great things are not informal!

In general, the concluding argument should be concluded with a favorable point of view based on the previous debate.

It is advisable to write down your own point of view and refute the other side's point of view during the debate.

Closing arguments are not fixed in this way.

We now say that those who achieve great things should pay attention to details, and we can summarize some of their characteristics: 1. Know people and make good use of them.

2. Courage and courage.

3. Firm faith.

To give an example, Zhou Gong spit and feed, and the world returns to the heart. It refers to eating more, spitting out the food in your mouth and then going to meet guests. Perform a thirst for talent.

Informality is reflected in not caring about eating and spitting, but in the fact that it must reflect the importance of others in this way, and it is reflected through this kind of detail.

From this point of view, although on the surface it seems that the big things are informal, in fact, the details determine success or failure.