What do you think are some of the common logical defects of Chinese?

Indiscriminately use analogical reasoning to deduce the great principles of life from irrelevant things or natural phenomena. Here I will casually quote "Lao Tzu" as an example

Jiang Hai can be the king of a hundred valleys, and he can be the king of a hundred valleys because of his goodness. It is a saint who wants to go to the people (according to the book of the king of horses, not noted), and he is under his words; want to be the ancestors; Behind him. It is to be above and the people are not important, and the people are not harmed by the front.

It is not tired of being pushed by the joy of the world. With its indisputability, the world can not fight for it. ”

The chain of inferences here, which is linked by a series of "yes", is logically worthless. However, all these inferences are derived from the natural phenomenon of "water flowing downward"! Because the position of the rivers and seas is low, they can accommodate hundreds of rivers, so in order to climb up to rule the people, the saint must first bow down and be small, what kind of reasoning is this?

Even if the principle of "what you want to take, you must first take it" is true, what does it have to do with the gravitational pull that causes water to flow?

Similarly, the "perception of heaven and man" in the "theory" of Chinese medicine is also laughable. There are things in nature, and there seems to be all in the body, and "wind, cold, summer, dampness, dryness, and fire" are all prepared. Lao Lu is a person with a "strong liver", even if he soaks in the swimming pool, he can't drown this "samadhi true fire".

If it continues to flourish like this, I am afraid that when it reaches the age of 60, it will have a "stroke", and its hands and feet will tremble like leaves in the wind. And my "tongue coating" is actually the same as the moss growing in the corner of the wall, but the color is different. If the "humidity" in the body is high, the tongue will grow a thick white moss; If the body is "hot", the moss is dried out, just as moss cannot grow in the Mexican desert.

I sometimes can't help but wonder why the Yellow Emperor, Zhang Zhongjing, and Sun Simiao didn't come up with the sun, moon and stars in their bodies back then?

This kind of morbid association makes us like Nietzsche's "Superman", step from the top of this mountain to the top of the other mountain, and make a wild "leap" between concepts. The American sinologist Fairbank pointed out the absurdity of this "chain inference" early on with the example of "self-cultivation, family unity, governing the country, and leveling the world." This "theory" has been enlarged from the "individual" to the "world" layer by layer, and has made continuous leaps and bounds, without any logical connection, but it has been pursued by scholars for 2,000 years, during which not many people have thought about it Even if a person cultivates himself to the realm of a living Buddha, will he automatically have the ability to unite his family, govern the country, and level the world?

After 2,000 years, it seems that only Cao Mengde dared to openly admit that he was willing to use "robbers and sisters-in-law" like Chen Ping to govern the country.

This tradition of indiscriminate use of analogical reasoning and even literary metaphors is still being carried forward by us every moment. In this regard, I wrote in "Where is the Bright Moon Round? Ask the Wine to the Sky" has already been painfully refuted, so I won't repeat it here.

Speak incoherently, and others can't understand it.

Usually, when listening to others talking and reading books, I can't figure out my thoughts.

I love listening to stories and reading stories more than using my brain to think, because it doesn't take my brain to read and listen to stories.

It's easy to get emotional when encountering things, instead of calming down and thinking about it.

It is easy to be instigated and fooled by others.

You can only start from yourself, for example, according to experience, what you see (hear) is what you are, and you don't know how to empathize, think from multiple angles, and think at a deeper level, and stay thinking on the surface.

I think people who don't have logical thinking have the following manifestations: 1. Do things in an unorganized way and are chaotic.

Second, the speech is not clear, and I can't understand it for a long time.

Third, the scumbag friend has weak learning ability.

Fourth, poor hands-on ability.

We will find that there are people around us who lack logic, so why do they lack logic? There is a possibility that their parents lack logic, or their guardians lack logic, so they are not trained to think logically from an early age, so they grow up to be lacking in logic. Scary is the second scenario:

Some elderly people or guardians will make up some reasons or casually perfunctory when coaxing children, in order to achieve some purpose. At this time, there is probably no logic at all when you have a conversation, and many children will receive such an educational process in their early childhood, and they will naturally not be able to form a complete logical process.

For example, one of the examples I heard today is this: an old man said let's go fishing in the river, and the child was happy to follow him to the river with a wicker, and then the old man said you put the wicker in the water, don't move, wait for the fish to take the bait, and then the child put it in. After a while, of course, there was no fish caught, and the child became impatient and began to make a fuss, and the old man wanted to take the child away, so he said that there were no fish here at all, let's go!

Then the child insisted on not leaving, well, after a while, a few fish swam in the water, and the old man hurriedly shouted in order to make the child happy, "Look at the fish here!" ”。

The logical problem with this passage is as follows:

1.Can wicker be fished?

2.Are there any fish here?

And the old man didn't care about this, he just coaxed the child to be happy and said it casually.

Some people may think it's nothing, because it's coaxing the child anyway? Say it casually, but it's the result of the casual talk that accumulates every day, and the final result, at least I think it may be this hail chain liquid sample.

People with poor logical thinking are manifested in various aspects, such as poor learning ability, weak hands-on ability, lack of eyesight, and inability to understand words.

1. Logical thinking is not good in all aspects, such as poor learning ability, weak hands-on ability, lack of eyesight, inability to understand words, etc.!

2. No matter what work you do, you must be brave enough to accept the challenges in front of you, any work is easy to do, and it is not easy to do anything if you want to do the best.

People with poor logical thinking will speak without hierarchy, without priority and subordination, they will sound very chaotic, they cannot express things clearly in the shortest language, and they will show great aphasia in justifying a thing.

In terms of dealing with people, they will grasp their eyebrows and mustaches, and they will not be able to catch anything when the time comes, and the hesitant personality factor leads to the fact that this kind of person is accustomed to losing everything no matter how old he is. Please don't debate anything with people with confused logical thinking, Xiucai meets soldiers, the reason is not clear, the cut is constant, the reason is still messy, the more noisy it is, the more chaotic it is, there is no logic, nonsense, and the logical anger is half dead.

Logical thinking ability needs to be cultivated, it is recommended to read more books, the table of contents part of the book you read is the framework structure of the whole book, and then to the title of each chapter, subheadings, etc. are its logic.

If you want to improve your logical thinking ability, it is recommended to conduct an overall analysis of a thing, which can be broken down into major problems, secondary problems, needs, goals, etc. to make a mind map, so that the conclusions drawn are more comprehensive and reliable. But the key point is that you can extract the problem of things from the surface very concretely, just like a doctor can analyze the root of the problem through the symptoms, which requires the accumulation of experience.

1. Poor judgment ability.

People with poor logical thinking, when they encounter problems that need to be judged and analyzed, they often don't know how to start thinking, and they can't give an answer that they think is correct.

Children with good thinking will give an answer based on their own knowledge, from their own known conditions and purposes, through their own thinking and analysis, and after making judgments.

What I want to tell you is that children may not be able to give the right answers, but as long as they think in the right way, they are worthy of praise, and it is also a good performance of logical thinking.

2. I can't understand what others are saying.

People with poor logical thinking, in daily communication, cannot correctly understand the intentions expressed by others, because they are not logical and cannot obtain valuable information and understand the intentions expressed in the words after logical analysis of the knowledge they hear in their brains.

Nor can it be combined with one's own knowledge, according to the other party's opinion, do a thought, give your own opinion.

3. High error rate.

Children with poor logical thinking cannot clearly analyze what they need to do and what they are missing. Often the correct judgment can not be given, and when deciding what to do, there are already mistakes, and even when they come up, they will do it randomly, and the error rate will naturally become very high.

Speech is slurred, contradictory, and to the point; Do things in a panic, not calm, easy to make mistakes, and lose everything; In summary, it is poor learning ability, weak hands-on ability, no eyesight, and inability to understand words.

I think people with poor logical thinking are shown to communicate with others, and they can't talk about an idea with others at all, and they have already talked about the second stage, and they don't understand what the first stage is.

1. Recognize one-sidedness.

To understand an objective thing, there is only one perceptual understanding, and it is impossible to find a comprehensive explanation and understanding in one's own knowledge base, which can easily produce wrong judgments and lead to wrong decisions.

2. The expression does not reach the meaning.

A person with poor logic can only describe objective facts, and cannot express his true intentions through objective facts, so that others cannot understand his behavior, and finally cause trouble in his study and life.

3. Poor ability to find and solve problems.

When encountering some kind of difficulty, without good logical thinking ability, it is impossible to find out where the root cause of the problem is, and often makes the behavior of treating the symptoms but not the root cause, even if the problem is found, many times it is impossible to make a correct interpretation, delaying the time to solve the problem, and finally it may cause more serious consequences.

Often people mention that their logical thinking ability is not good, and they are prone to a misunderstanding, that is, they feel that their logical analysis is not in place, and their thinking ability is not good. However, in the vast majority of cases, it is due to another reason, namely, the lack of knowledge and experience.

1. Slow response.

Children with poor logical thinking are usually relatively slow to react, and they don't know how to react when they encounter things. For example, when a car comes, the child can't remember to dodge; The parents are working, but he can't think of helping, which is commonly known as no "eyesight frame".

Many parents think that it would be good if their children are older, in fact, they will indeed improve when they are older, but ignore the reasons behind the poor logical thinking, and the children's logical thinking will always lag behind other children, and their learning and work abilities will naturally be different.

2. Poor language skills.

Many people may be puzzled, what is the relationship between poor logical thinking and language skills? In fact, our language expression needs to be organized logically in order to clearly express our intentions and ideas, and people with poor logical thinking cannot clearly express their thoughts, and may not be able to say that the donkey's head is not the horse's mouth.

3. One-sided analysis and view of problems.

We all know that when we encounter a problem and want to solve it, we need to weigh and analyze it from multiple angles in order to find the best way to solve it.

However, people with poor logical thinking will only think about solutions from a one-sided perspective, and often ignore the consequences of other factors. For example, the use of microwave ovens, children with good logical thinking will think about which foods cannot be microwaved and which can be used; People who are not good at logical thinking will only think about my food, which can be heated in the microwave.

What you say is something that others can't understand, but you feel that you have said everything you need to say. I often can't understand what others say, can't understand what others do, and don't pay attention to the habits of people around me talking and doing things.

1. Poor ability to deeply understand and flexibly use basic knowledge.

2. Poor imagination.

3. Poor ability to make and read pictures.

The exercise of logical thinking ability can improve one's understanding of different aspects of things and the internal relationship through the process of constantly questioning various things, and put forward more thinking and discrimination from different angles through questioning. Develop a large number of links between things in the brain, so that they can develop logical thinking more effectively.

Ideas arise in debate, both within oneself and on oneself. For example, as to whether sovereignty is higher than human rights or vice versa, I believe that it is the sovereignty that protects human rights that is greater than human rights, and cannot include sovereignty that causes the king to feast on the baby, and that sovereignty must be defined, and the former is conditionally valid. The reason for this realization is that there is a debate on the issue, otherwise it would not be thought about.

The sovereignty of protecting human rights has logical thinking here that it is necessary to protect human rights, so we cannot change the concept to say that sovereignty is greater than human rights, in fact, this logic shows that human rights are higher than sovereignty.

People with poor logical thinking can actually easily tell. For example, if you have a problem with him, he doesn't have his own ideas and always follows your thinking; Secondly, when you talk to him, he always can't express himself clearly, and he talks for a long time.

It just gives people a feeling of looking stupid, because the logic is not strong, so the head always can't turn around.