Is the D7000 on the market? What is the standard price? Which one is more worth buying than the D90?

I've been using the D90 and I feel that the D90 is really a great machine.

First, buy new digital products and don't buy old, D7000 is the successor model of D90, since it has come out, so don't consider D90. Don't hesitate to do that. As for the prototype you mentioned, if you choose the right channel, there won't be, such as JD.com, Newegg, and Excellence.

Buy it and check the shutter count. Or go to the Ruiyi store, and you can touch the machine to see if it feels right.

Second, DXOMARK yesterday (2010-11-8) announced the latest image quality test results for the D7000, which scored 80 points, ranking the D7000 10th out of all models tested (full-frame and APS-C format). With a score of 82 for the Pentax K-5, the D7000 is second in the APS-C format camera. This shows that the performance of the D7000 is very competitive, so if you don't plan to go to full picture, the D7000 is preferred.

Third, and this is the most important point, you may not necessarily believe it, but I must say.

If you can buy full-frame in one step, don't think about APS-C, go straight to full-frame. Otherwise you'll regret it. At least some of my friends who bought APS-C want to buy full-frame, and I'm sure you are the same.

Since you buy it, it's full-frame, it's really right.

that's all.

I have been engaged in wedding dresses and wedding photography with D90 for a long time, and I have not used D7000, I think it is okay to see the parameters, there are several important improvements, 1The pixels have been greatly improved, and the studio often produces large paintings, and the quality of the D90 is slightly worse, but the average home D90 is sufficient.

2.The camera can be autofocused, the camera time is not limited, and the D90 camera time is only 5 minutes, which is inconvenient 3The dual card slots have a large memory, and previous cards can also be used.

4.After all, it's still a half-frame camera, and the previous lens can still be used, but after all, the lens is more important than the camera, and the D90 is not bad at all with a good lens, so if I choose the machine now, I will also consider the D90, and save money to get a better lens.

5.After all, it's a little more expensive.

Just listed. The standard configuration is about 10,000. If you want to say which one to buy, it depends on how much you're willing to spend.

D90 belongs to the low-end in the most cost-effective, the most popular machine, so there are too many people to buy it, a little bit of personality. D7000 is a grade higher, the higher it is, the better the performance in all aspects, but it is inevitable that there will be water ...... when it is just listedIf you can bear this**, of course, it is recommended to buy a new machine. But it depends on whether it's necessary or not, and of course you have to weigh it yourself

The D7000 is 3000 more expensive than the D90, and you say how much better than the D90.

D90, D7000 is at least 3K more expensive than D90, you add a little more, enough to buy a mid-range head Digital technology will never be able to keep up with the beat, unless the rich second generation Buying a good head is the king!

D90As an old product three years ago, it does have a good performance, but the price has not been reduced for a long time, and it is nearly a thousand dollars more expensive than Canon's 550D, but the performance is actually lagging behind the 550D. If you want to say that the king of cost performance may probably be 450D and 550D. The upgraded version of the D90 may be cost-effective if it comes out, but it is unpredictable now.

The D90 is a direct competitor to all machines below the 60D.

The D7000 is currently leading in terms of parameters. Worth recommending.