Who knows a difficult grammatical problem?

Similarities: The Chinese meaning is the same, they are: Who do you think you are?

Differences: Who do you think you are?Feel the meaning of the sentence focused on who, you think youWho

Ah, aggressive, more commonly used, can be used when quarreling, the emotions represented are stronger, do you think who you are? I feel that the meaning of the sentence is focused on, think, youthink

Who are you, the emotion expressed is that you don't be self-righteous, evaluative, I don't think you can do it.

Example: Who do you think will win?What do you thinkWho

Will it win? do you think who will win？Youthink

Who will win.

Personal understanding is the difference in tone.

The first sentence can be broken as, who, do you think, you are?

The second sentence can be broken as, do you think, who you are?

The former who you are acts as the stem of the sentence, the subject-predicate object.

The latter who you are as the object of do you think.

Hello! who do you think you are?Chinese means: Who do you think you are?

This is a special interrogative sentence, and this sentence can only be expressed in this way. The second sentence is a general interrogative sentence: Who do you think it is? Nothing like that is spoken, it's a wrong sentence.

I believe that there will always be a smooth side to the road.

The second sentence is a sick sentence, which no one uses in English.

Who you think you are and who do you think can be you.

There is no problem with this statement.

and is a coordinating conjunction that can juxtapose two subjects, predicates, objects, and sentences, and in this sentence and is juxtaposing two sentences.

First sentence:there seems a friend coming from afar

Coming from afar is a postposition for friend. )

Second sentence:i feel exceedingly delighted

Sentence Analysis:

1. Because it is two sentences in parallel, there must be two predicates, so it is no problem for two verbs to appear in this sentence.

2. Coming is a non-predicate verb as a postposition, not a non-predicate verb as a main sentence, and English generally does not have two non-predicate verbs in parallel as a postposition. Therefore, even if feel is juxtaposed, it is also juxtaposed with seem, and it cannot be juxtaposed with coming.

3. The subject of the two sentences is not the same, if the feel becomes feeling, then the logical subject of feel becomes there, but by the meaning of the sentence (".I feel happy"Obviously, you can know that the feel action is done by i, not there, so you can't change feel to feeling.

4. What if it's a parallel predicate? If feel is juxtaposed with seem, then the subject of feel must be the same as seem, that is, there, at this time, you can look back to point 3, from the meaning of the sentence (".I feel happy"Obviously, you can know that the feel action is done by i, not there, so you can't use feel as a predicate in the first sentence.

There are 2 whethers in this sentence, both of which act as conjunctions in the sentence. You're not asking that, are you?

It is possible to change positions, but when the object is too long, it is customary to put it at the back. For example: I will take sth

with me.If the object is too long, say: i will take with me+...

The first whether is a conjunction, and the second is an adverbial in an object clause. It can be changed, but the sentence structure will change.

Passive voice.

That is, our alliance can be organized more perfectly.

Be is a connecting verb, followed by an adjective as an expression, and perfected is used as an adjective at this time.

This is the passive voice, and the variety is be +

For example, many people speak ChineseMany people speak Chinese.

Predicate: The action of speak is performed by the subject many people. ‘

Passive is: Chinese is spoken by many peopleChinese is spoken by many people.

Hope it helps.

When you really want to do something, you should connect more sentences with negative meanings).

This sentence omits the that in front of the object clause.