SAT 1 Grammar 5 and SAT 1 Grammar Question

Recommendation is incorrect: The adjective clause is inverted, the derive predicate verb is plural, and the second half of the sentence should be interpreted as bringing to the Indian Seat Valley that the northern and southern Indian alphabets are derived from Aramaic manuscripts.

Bring a with B, if A is too long or B is too short, it will be converted to bring with B A, to avoid being top-heavy, where A is the aramaic script If it is too long, move it to the back.

If you don't change it, it doesn't mean clearly, you can't tell whether it's empire or script, and after you change it, it refers to script (the same name, it seems to be).

The second one are you sure it's not the wrong answer - I think it's derives... Because script is singular and it doesn't refer to things that have happened in the past and are changing in the present.

Actually, here is bring with something, and here it refers to Indus Valley, so it's very clear.

Don't analyze the structure of the sentence wrongly.

The Achaemenid Empire of Persia predicate reached

Object The Indus Valley

The time adverbial in the fifth centurybring is the form of the table accompaniment, which is used here.

from which The translation is not a problem when the sentence comes out: the Bohemian Empire reached the Indus Valley in the 15th century BC and brought with it manuscripts originating in the Aramaic alphabet of northern and southern India.

1. As well as: Here is: with... Just as good ...

i.e.: as... as 。。Comparative structure of the bootstrap.

In as... as 。。In the guided comparison structure, the object of comparison is as. As B, A and B are the same thing.

A in the question is: Few poets: make people, so B is also a poet, and people are not poems or works.

Therefore, CD and A are excluded from collocation error.

2、as。。。as 。。The auxiliary verbs does, do, be, etc., can be omitted from the comparative structure of the guide.

Therefore: b edna millay=b. edna millay does

e Wrong tense.

Hope it helps.

Few poets as well as edna millay are two juxtaposed components as subjects.

sweeping unchecked in unchecked is the past participle as an adverbial modification, sweeping is equivalent to an adjective doing an adverbial with the logical subject strong wind is a dominant relation, meaning uninhibited and unrestricted.

With almost unchecked sweeping over greatest distances The mistake is that both past and present participles lack logical subjects.

It should be with strong wind almost unchecked sweeping over greatest distances ,it is a prime component of the grassland climate

So sweeping almost unchecked over greatest distances is the correct answer.

sweeping...This is the present participle to do the accompanying adverbial, which is equivalent to which sweeps. Because the subject is wind, use the initiative.

one of the most successful african american business in history, the motown record corporation was founded in 1959 in detroit by berry gordy.

Translation: Motown Records, one of the most successful non-American companies in history, was founded in Detroit in 1959 by Berry Gordy.

One (of the most successful African American Business in History) is aligned with The Motown Record Corporation below. If you select e, it means that this record label is as.

The most successful non-U.S. company.

b is the virtual of the present and d is the virtual of the future.

The second half of the sentence uses will, and the whole sentence is indeed a discussion of the future, so choose D

First of all, to the effect that the singular song of the humpback salmon is always lower in pitch and lasts longer than that of the birds. This singing voice piqued the interest of scientists to a certain extent, since cetaceans do not have practical vocal cords.

Look at option b: This is a mistake when the expression sound is longer than that of birds. And that's right.

If you choose B, "The Eerie Songs" and "Birds" are compared, and different things cannot be compared.

Theoretically, it is possible to detach this sentence from this sentence, but depending on the specific sentence, the even more decrepit here clearly implies that the second half of the sentence is also part of the subject, so it cannot be understood in the way you do. The spirit of drilling into the horns of the bull is commendable, as long as you figure it out yourself, and you don't have to dwell too much on individual sentences and words.

Note "them". If you follow the way you think about it, there's something wrong with the reference to them.