What is the meaning of quantitative and qualitative change? What is the relationship between quantit

Quantitative change is also known as "gradient". Opposite to qualitative change. It refers to the increase or decrease in the number of things and the change of place, which is a continuous, gradual and insignificant change.

Materialist dialectics holds that quantitative change is one of the basic states of the movement of things, which is caused by the unity and struggle of all aspects of the internal contradictions of things, and is a continuous change that is going on every moment of things, so it has objective universality.

The transformation of things from one qualitative state to another. One of the basic states of the movement of things. The same amount becomes relative.

Also known as mutations. Qualitative change occurs on the basis of quantitative change, marking the interruption of the gradual process of quantity. The qualitative change of things is rooted in the internal contradictory movement of things.

When the struggle between the internal contradictions of things intensifies and the balance of forces between the two sides of the basic contradiction leads to a fundamental change in the primary and secondary positions of the two sides of the basic contradiction, and the non-principal contradiction aspect that was originally in the dominant position rises to the main aspect that determines the nature of the thing, one thing is transformed into another thing of different qualities. The qualitative change of things disintegrates the original qualitative unity of things, destroys the relative static state of things, and breaks through the original degree of things, thus showing significant, rapid and drastic changes. Qualitative change plays an important role in the development of things.

Qualitative change is the decisive link in the development of things, and it is also the basis for the creation of the world's many different things and their rich personalities.

Philosophical Truth: What is Quantitative Change to Qualitative Change?

Qualitative change is the change of the fundamental nature of things, that is, this thing becomes that thing, and quantitative change is the change of quantity, place, size, and spatial arrangement and combination.

！.Quantitative change and qualitative change are opposites and unification (there are both opposites and unity).

Dialectical materialism and historical materialism are not inclusive relations.

2.First question:

Antagonism is a basic concept of Marxism. Quantitative and qualitative change are opposites, but there is a difference between affirmation and negation (as you can see).

According to Marxist philosophy, there are two kinds of opposites, one is the opposition of the apparent concept and the other is the opposition of the essence of the concept. Affirmation and negation are the opposition of the apparent concept, and quantitative change and qualitative change are the essential opposition of the concept.

This opposition between quantitative and qualitative change is the philosophical division of Marxist philosophy, not our judgment based on our daily sense experience. As for what is the opposition of the apparent concept and what is the opposition of the concept in essence, you can look up the relevant books to learn. But you should now be clear that, according to Marxist theory, quantitative change and qualitative change are opposites.

Second question:

Marxism consists of three parts: Marxist philosophy, political economy, and scientific socialism. Among them, Marxist philosophy includes two theoretical systems:

Dialectical materialism, historical materialism. Dialectical materialism is the science that uses dialectical methods to study the general laws of nature, human society, and the development of thinking, while historical materialism is the science of the general laws of the development of human society. Although dialectical materialism also has a theory of social development, it cannot be said to be an inclusive relation.

Because they have different objects of study, they are self-contained. Just as we say that philosophy is the sum of all human disciplines, it is not related to political science, history, physics, and biology, but is a different discipline.

1 pair is immediately unified.

2. Dialectical materialism should be subordinate to dialectical materialism (there are views that say that there are different schools of materialism).

3 The above is purely personal opinion.

This question falls under the research category of "systems science".

The relationship between quantitative change and qualitative change is both distinct and interrelated. Quantitative change causes qualitative change, qualitative change causes new quantitative change, and new quantitative change develops to a certain extent and causes new qualitative change, so alternately, repeatedly, and constantly transformed, which is the law of mutual change in the quality of things change and development.

First, quantitative and qualitative changes are interdependent. Qualitative change depends on quantitative change, and there is no qualitative change without quantitative change. When quantitative changes accumulate and reach a certain level, they will inevitably cause qualitative changes. Quantitative change depends on qualitative change, and qualitative change is the inevitable result of quantitative change.

Second, quantitative change and qualitative change penetrate each other, and there is qualitative change in quantitative change, and there is quantitative change in qualitative change. Due to the complexity and imbalance in the development of things, quantitative and qualitative changes are often not carried out in a pure form, but are intertwined and interpenetrated. This is mainly manifested in the process of quantitative change, there is some qualitative change, and there is quantitative expansion in the process of qualitative change.

Third, quantitative and qualitative changes are mutually transformative. The development of things is a process of change from quantity to quality and from quality to quantity. The change of things always starts with the quantitative change first, and when the quantitative change is within a certain range, that is, it does not break through the degree, it will not cause qualitative change.

However, when the quantitative change reaches the joint point, that is, when the limit of the degree is broken, the qualitative change of things will occur. Qualitative change is the inevitable result of quantitative change, which consolidates and completes quantitative change. At the same time, qualitative change causes new quantitative change and opens the way for new quantitative change.

Quantitative change and qualitative change are opposites and unified, they are two sides of contradiction, and one is indispensable.

The reason why they are opposed is because they are different from each other, quantitative change cannot be qualitative change, qualitative change cannot be quantitative change, this opposition is different from the opposition of affirmation and negation Do you think that the opposition between quantitative change and qualitative change is not as "sharp" as the opposition between affirmation and negation, your concept of "opposition" is not very clear, and opposition is not only an incompatible antagonism, not only mutually exclusive, it also has the meaning of distinguishing and distinguishing each other.

In addition, they are also unified, and don't there be three dialectical points about them in your textbook? Unification can be understood in this way, it is precisely because there is a certain relationship between the two sides (those three points), the two sides must depend on each other, quantitative change without qualitative change has no meaning of existence, qualitative change leaves the quantitative change without the value of realizing its own leap

Isn't it a bit abstract, I don't know if you understand it, according to what you have learned, do your best

Quantitative change and qualitative change are, of course, opposites and unity. Embodied in 1Quantitative change and qualitative change are two different states in the development of things.

Quantitative change is a gradual and insignificant change, while qualitative change is a fundamentally significant change. It's the opposite. 2.

The development of things always begins with quantitative change, and quantitative change is a necessary preparation for qualitative change, and qualitative change is the inevitable result of quantitative change. This is unity. 3.

It can also be understood from the struggle and identity of the contradictions. The fundamental driving force for the development of things is contradiction. In fact, it is embodied in the relationship between struggle and identity, and the struggle is contained in the sameness, and in the process of the struggle breaking through the identity, it is a quantitative change, and when the struggle breaks through the identity, it is a qualitative change, and the fundamental nature of things changes.

Dialectical materialism certainly includes historical materialism, and when we talk about the characteristics of Ma Zhe, we must first say that Ma Zhe realized the organic unity of materialism and dialectics for the first time, and then talk about the organic unity of the materialist dialectical view of nature and the materialist dialectical view of history.

Dialectical materialism includes materialism, epistemology, dialectics, and historical materialism.

Among them, historical materialism is Ma Zhe's greatest contribution. Because no one had recognized materialism in the view of history before that.

I'm so tired of fighting, let's chase some points, hehe).

Quantitative change will not last forever, and when the accumulation of quantity reaches a certain level, it will inevitably cause qualitative change and become something of another nature.

Quantitative change will not last forever, and when the accumulation of quantity reaches a certain level, it will inevitably cause qualitative change and become something of another nature.

I remember that this is a must-have test point in the graduate school entrance examination.

First of all, opposition refers to the difference between the two, and in a broad sense, any difference is an opposite, as long as it is different, it is an opposite. Quantitative change and qualitative change are definitely different, so it must be opposite, otherwise we can't distinguish which changes are quantitative and qualitative; The fact that people can distinguish between them means that they are opposites.

Dialectical materialism and historical materialism are not two different "isms" that are separated, but they are only two "new" aspects and two main characteristics of Marxist philosophy compared with the old materialism, and they are the signs of the dialectical and thorough nature of the "new materialism." If we really want to talk about the relationship between the two, we can only say that dialectical materialism includes historical materialism, because historical materialism is also dialectical and materialistic, and dialectical materialism is also applicable in the concept of history, and its application in the concept of history is historical materialism.

The concepts of "quantity" and "quality" were first put forward by Kant, and the two are two of the twelve categories of knowledge, and I have forgotten how Kant changed from quantity to quality, but since Marx mainly inherited Hegel's thought, I can talk about Hegel's "quantity to quality".

Kant transitioned from the category of quantity to the category of quality, while Hegel established the category of quantity from the category of quality. The qualitative stipulation makes it a "something" that is different from "other things", and the quality of "something" is always determined by "other things" and "other things of other things", but this external stipulation will always not be able to finally determine the quality of something, but will fall into "bad infinity"; Therefore, it is only by returning to each thing itself to become "one" in itself, to attain "true infinity", that qualitative certainty (i.e., it prescribes itself as an infinite "prescribeable"). The other "self-made oneness" has become "many" relative to it, and this has advanced from qualitative to quantitative stipulation.

Quantity is the abandonment and indifference to quality, and the change of quantity is usually gradual and accumulative, and does not affect quality; However, once the quantitative change exceeds a certain "degree", things will undergo a qualitative "leap", that is, a new quality will be produced from the quantitative change.

In fact, Marx's qualitative change is actually the same thing in our opinion, and there is basically no difference from Hegel, except that it is materialism and idealism.

1. The meaning of quantitative change and quantitative changeQuantitative. Quantitative change is the increase or decrease in the number of things, the change of places, and the change of elements in the spatial combination.

Quantitative change is a gradual change within the range of degrees. For example, changes in water temperature.

Qualitative. Qualitative change is the change in the nature of things, and the transformation of things from one qualitative state to another.

Qualitative change is a breakthrough change, a gradual interruption. For example, ice water vapor.

There are two basic forms of qualitative change:

Explosive leaps: volcanic eruptions, social revolutions.

Non-explosive leaps: species variation, social reform.

2. The dialectical relationship between quantitative change and qualitative changeOppose each other. Quantitative change shows the continuity of the development of things, and qualitative change shows the discontinuity of the development of things.

The opposition between quantitative change and qualitative change is concentrated in the degree of whether or not to break through things.

Unified with each other. First, mutual transformation.

Quantitative change causes qualitative change, and qualitative change is the inevitable result of quantitative change.

Qualitative change leads to new quantitative change, and quantitative change is carried out on the basis of new quality.

Second, interdependence.

Quantitative change is a necessary preparation for qualitative change, and there is no qualitative change without quantitative change.

Qualitative change opens the way for new quantitative changes, and without qualitative changes, there will be no new quantitative changes.

Third, mutual penetration.

There are some qualitative changes in quantitative changes.

There is quantitative expansion in qualitative change.

3. The practical significance of the principle of dialectical relationsIn the quantitative change stage, we should not be in a hurry, and we should be good at accumulation;

In the face of qualitative change, we cannot hesitate and rush forward at the critical moment.

Opportunity favors prepared minds!

The dialectical relationship between quantitative change and qualitative change is as follows: quantitative change is the necessary preparation for qualitative change, qualitative change is the inevitable result of quantitative change, and quantitative change and qualitative change are interpenetrating. The law of mass interchange reveals that the development process of things is the unity of continuity and stage.

Degree is not only the unity of quality and quantity, but also distinguishes between quantitative change and qualitative change. The fundamental sign of quantitative and qualitative change is whether the change of things exceeds the degree, the change within the scope of the degree is the quantitative change, and the change beyond the degree is the qualitative change.

Everything is a unity of quality and quantity. Qualitative is the prescriptive nature of a thing that becomes itself and distinguishes it from it. The prescriptiveness of matter is determined by the particularity of the internal contradictions of things. Epistemic quality is the starting point and foundation of understanding and practice.

Quantity is a prescriptive nature that can be expressed in quantity. Understanding the quantity of things is the deepening and precision of understanding, and only by correctly understanding the amount of things that are resistant to things can we correctly estimate the status and role of things in practice.

Quantitative change and qualitative change are dialectically unified: quantitative change is the premise of qualitative change, and qualitative change is the inevitable result of quantitative change. It requires us to pay attention to the accumulation of quantity, and when the change of quantity is advantageous, we must promote the accumulation of quantity, and lose no time in promoting a leap; When quantitative change is unfavorable, it is necessary to adhere to the principle of moderation, control quantitative change, and prevent the occurrence of qualitative change.

In college life, in order to achieve academic and career success, college students need to pay attention to the accumulation of quantity in their daily study and work, consolidate the foundation of academic and practical work, and lay the foundation for academic and career success. "Make progress every day" and "don't take the good type of history as small and do nothing" should become everyone's correct attitude towards life.

In daily study and life, it is necessary to control the development of harmful quantitative changes, and it is especially necessary to pay special attention to "do not take evil as small". If you have shortcomings, you should correct your mistakes in a timely manner, prevent the accumulation of evil and prevent the expansion of your shortcomings and mistakes, and affect your career and life.