What is the difference between our fourth generation war opportunities and those of the United State

The fourth-generation aircraft of the United States is represented by F22 and F35, in addition to F22A has been equipped with a batch, the others are still being studied and verified, the main emphasis is on stealth and supersonic cruise, of which F35C emphasizes short take-off and vertical landing, compared with the previous generation F16, F18 Hornet has been greatly improved.

The Russian T50 (Russia's self-proclaimed fifth-generation aircraft), which is an upgraded version of the previous generation Su-27, Su-30, is currently in the verification stage, because the detailed data is not disclosed, so it is unknown.

China does not yet have a fourth-generation aircraft, of which the main representative of the third-generation aircraft is the imported Russian-made Su-30MK, as well as China's own imitation of the Su-30 replica, that is, the J-10, the engine and avionics of the J-10 have been successfully imitated, which means that we can already produce the third-generation aircraft on our own, which is a leap forward in our country's aerospace industry, although it is still far from the world's advanced level, but it is already a milestone.

The algebra of the Russian aircraft differs from ours and the United States, and his newest T-50 is"5th generation aircraft"And in performance it is equivalent to the American 4th generation aircraft (F-22 and F-35).China currently does not have 4th generation fighters, and the latest J-10 and J-11 (domestic Su-30) are both 3rd generation aircraft or 3rd generation +

However, our national defense standard is to catch up with the United States and Russia, and there are performance differences, but to achieve continuous generation, that is, there is no difference in rank. Therefore, it is believed that in the near future a new type of Chinese fighter will appear.

Our four generations are only the four generations of Russia, and they are even inferior to the four generations of Russia, and it is still a question whether the J-10 improved version can fight with the Su-35. By the time the fourth generation of our American Standard comes out, it is estimated that American drones have already supported half of American fighters.

The development process of our American Standard fourth-generation aircraft is similar to the research and development process of American UAVs, and even lags behind, and American UAVs have already been put on aircraft carriers. We are still a big step behind the world's advanced level, the potential of the J-10 is limited, and the fourth generation of China's real American Standard must be restarted, but there is no news of this project so far, and even if there is, it will take 20 years to take shape, so the gap between us and the United States is quite large.

I'm not talking about how advanced the United States is, what I want to say is that our military targets are India, Vietnam, North Korea, and other countries, not the United States, and if the military gap with the United States is too big. This year's increase in military spending has slowed down again, and this is unfavorable to us as we rise, and China's rise will inevitably lead to increased friction with countries at the table, and it will not work without a strong armament to increase its weight in international affairs.

In fact, they are all the same, much the same.

The standard of the fourth-generation aircraft for China is mainly due to some difficulties in the engine (thrust and thrust-to-weight ratio, life problems). The rest is not a big problem for China.

There are three Chinese fighter generation standards in the world, Russian standards, European and American standards, and the Chinese standard that was born not long ago (since a few days ago, the head of the Air Force explained on CCTV7 that the improved version of the J-10 is our fourth-generation aircraft).

Because according to Russian standards, the J-10 is a fourth-generation aircraft without improvement.

According to European and American standards, no matter how improved the J-10 is, it can't change to long-term supersonic cruise, stealth at all angles, and it can't meet the standards of F22 in any case, and it is still a third-generation aircraft, which can also be called 3 and a half generations.

Then it seems that the J-10 improved model = fourth-generation aircraft marks the birth of the fighter generation standard --- the Chinese standard.

Maozi's new-generation fighter has just made its first flight, and it is still far from service. Our next-generation fighter is certainly the product of copycat Maozi and the United States on the basis of the use of Maozi technology and its own technology.

First, according to Maozi's algorithm, the Su-27 is the fourth generation, and the F22 T50 belongs to the 5th generation aircraft, and Lao Mei also recognizes this statement, only the rabbit does not buy it.

Second, Maozi does not have a fourth-generation aircraft in service, and the T50 is still in the test flight stage, so it cannot be counted. Now the only fourth-generation aircraft that are really in service are the old American F22 and F35 (mass production has begun).

Third, even Maozi's T50 personally feels that it is not a real fourth-generation aircraft, from the ** point of view, he does not have an internal bomb magazine, and things have to be hung under the wings, which seriously affects stealth, indicating that Maozi is still eating his old book.

Fourthly, this super-maneuverability of the Su-35 belongs to something that does not have much real combat significance. When the plane is not plugged in, and when the battle starts, the wings are full of bombs and missiles, so it is estimated that this kind of action will not be possible.

Secondly, the maximum overload that the pilot can withstand is 9g, which is destined to have a limited range of super-maneuverability. The latest Sidewinder AIM9X has functions such as post-launch locking and over-the-shoulder launch, and its maneuverability far exceeds that of the aircraft.

In other words, before the AIM9X, the mobility of the Su-35 was useless.