The question left by the teacher in the modern history class In the face of foreign aggression, the

Updated on history 2024-02-08
24 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    1. There is a huge gap in strength.

    2. Lose the small game and protect the overall situation.

    3. The psychology of the rulers under the feudal system who are afraid of the people. Feudal rulers have always regarded the people as the first place, and all policies and guidelines are formulated to prevent people from unrest and maintain the stability of the rule.

    In short, the feudal rulers valued whether their power was threatened, and in their hearts, the people were the troubles, and as long as foreign powers recognized their power and gave them space, their basic requirements were met. In the face of a rout and the aggressors do not want to occupy our country, peace talks are the best way to maintain the overall situation. Therefore, it is not surprising that many unequal treaties have been signed.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Your question is a bit contradictory, is it hypothetical performance blocking or is it a real instance?

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Modern wars affect the whole body, and the US-Iraq war is a good counterexample. A superpower like the United States cannot support a war in which the battlefield is built in another country, let alone a developing China. China needs to develop, and only when it develops and grows can it fundamentally resist foreign aggression.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Lack of sufficient military force to defend against aggression. That's all.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Don't understand the meaning of your question? Illustrate the white point.

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The most fundamental reason is that modern China is poor and weak, its economic, political, and military affairs lag behind the Western powers in an all-round way, and the gap in national strength is the root cause of the failure of China's anti-aggression struggle in modern times. Second, there is no advanced class leadership and no scientific and theoretical guidance suited to China's national conditions. The peasant class, the landlord class, and the bourgeoisie all have their limitations and are therefore unable to accomplish victory in the struggle against aggression.

    The third is that feudalism in modern China is very powerful, and the collusion between feudalism and imperialism has increased the resistance of anti-imperialism and anti-feudalism. The implication is that a country must find a development path that suits its own national conditions. We must always adhere to independent development and not rely too much on foreign countries.

    We must take the maintenance of national independence and national unity as the bottom line and foundation. At the same time, a country can only be strong when it is open up, so that it can be truly invincible.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The main thing is the weakness and incompetence of **, plus the backwardness of **.

    If we are backward, we will be beaten, and we must enrich the country and strengthen the army.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    。Reasons: First of all, the corruption of China's social system in modern times was the fundamental reason for the failure of the anti-aggression war.

    Second, China's economic and technological backwardness in modern times is another important reason for the failure of the anti-aggression war. Moreover, at that time, the ** could not mobilize and did not dare to mobilize the masses to fight. Lesson:

    First, in modern China, in order to strive for national independence and national prosperity, it is necessary to change the semi-colonial and semi-feudal social system under the joint rule of imperialism and feudalism. Second, if we are backward, we will be beaten, and in order to win the war against aggression, we need to catch up with each other in science and technology and increase the country's overall strength.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The first is the corruption of the social system, and the second is the backwardness of the economy and technology. The former is the root cause. This is because it is precisely because of the corruption of the social system that the situation of economic and technological backwardness has not been changed for a long time.

    The defeat of the war against aggression can be said to be the victory of the superior social system of the foreign aggressors over China.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Ignoring the power of the broad masses of the people. It is necessary to unite the workers and peasants as the most solid force.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The country is rich and the people are strong, and naturally no one dares to invade.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    If you want to talk about modern times, it is hilarious. (China's modern times are the Second Opium War in 1840 to the founding of New China in 1949).

    The first was the Opium War of 1840 and 1841, the British invasion (the signing of the Treaty of Nanjing).

    In July 1984, Japan declared war without declaring it. In August, please ** was forced to declare war on Japan. Signing of the Treaty of Shimonoseki.

    In 1900, the Eight-Nation Coalition invaded China (as for these eight countries, I will not go into details), Cixi declared war on the whole world and signed the Xinchou Treaty.

    On July 7, 1937, Little Japan invaded China in an all-out way, and the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression lasted for 8 years. During this period, China also sent an expeditionary force to Burma to resist the Japanese.

    The course of the war cannot be elaborated, please Haihan.

    It's a pity that I was one step ahead of the brother upstairs. Let's add to the landlord a few wars in the contemporary era (after 1949) (larger), and these two points are not in vain.

    The War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, the Sino-Soviet Zhenbao Island War, the Self-Defense Counterattack War against Vietnam, the Sino-Indian Border War, the Sino-Vietnamese Naval Battle, and the Kinmen Artillery Battle.

    Please be considerate of the date.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Hello. 1。First Opium War. China's defeat and forced to sign the Treaty of Nanjing, which led to the beginning of China's transformation from a feudal society to a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society. The Opium War was the beginning of modern Chinese history.

    2。Second Opium War. China's defeat and forced to sign the Treaty of Tientsin and the Treaty of Peking deepened China's semi-colonial trend.

    3.In the First Sino-Japanese War, China was defeated and forced to sign the Treaty of Shimonoseki, which greatly deepened China's semi-colonization.

    4.In the Eight-Nation Alliance's war of aggression against China, China was defeated and forced to sign the Treaty of Xincho, and China was completely reduced to a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Opium War 1940-1942 Unequal treaties such as the Treaty of Nanjing, the Treaty of Commerce between the Five Mouths, and the Treaty of Humen were signed, and China began to degenerate into a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society.

    The Second Opium War 1956-1960 The Treaty of Tianjin and the Treaty of Beijing were signed with Britain, France, the United States and Russia, and the degree of colonization of China was further deepened.

    Sino-French War 1883-1885 The Sino-French New Treaty was signed, and the crisis in China's southwestern frontier deepened.

    Sino-Japanese War 1894 In 1895, the Treaty of Shimonoseki was signed, and the level of Chinese semi-colonial dialect was greatly deepened.

    The Eight-Nation Coalition War of Aggression against China 1900-1901 The Treaty of Xinchou was signed with 11 countries, and China was completely reduced to a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The First Opium War signed the Treaty of Nanjing.

    The Second Opium War signed the Treaty of Beijing and the Treaty of Tianjin, Britain and France burned the Old Summer Palace and plundered countless treasures.

    The First Sino-Japanese War signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki.

    The Eight-Nation Coalition invaded China and signed the Xinchou Treaty.

    Anti-Japanese War.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    1840 1841 Opium War, Qing ** defeated, signed the Treaty of Nanjing with Great Britain 1894, Sino-Japanese War, Qing ** defeated, signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki with Japan.

    In 1900, the Eight-Nation Coalition invaded China, the Qing Dynasty was defeated, and the Xinchou Treaty was signed.

    On July 7, 1937, Japan invaded China in an all-out way, and after eight years of anti-Japanese war, China won the war.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    In the Opium War, China was defeated and compensated the victorious countries. The two armies of the Eight-Nation invaded China, and China was defeated. In Japan's war of aggression against China, China defeated Japan.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    The Opium War (1840-1842) led to the signing of the Treaty of Nanjing; The Second Opium War (1856-1860) saw the signing of the Treaty of Beijing and the Treaty of Tianjin; Sino-French War (1883-1885) Treaty of Vietnam was signed; Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki; The Eight-Nation Alliance's War of Aggression against China (1900-1901) resulted in the signing of the Xinchou Treaty.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    In the Opium War, the Qing Dynasty was defeated and forced to sign the Sino-British Treaty of Nanjing

    The Eight-Nation Coalition invaded China and was forced to sign the Xinchou Treaty

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    The Opium War, the Second Opium War, the Sino-French Battle of Mawei, the Eight-Nation Alliance's Invasion of China, and the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, only the War of Resistance against Japan can be regarded as a "victory."

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Where do you say, from the Qing Dynasty or from the Han Dynasty?

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    The First Opium War ended when the Treaty of Nanjing was signed, and China began to gradually degenerate from a feudal society to a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society. The Opium War was the beginning of modern Chinese history.

    The Treaty of Tientsin was signed during the Second Opium War, which gave the powers of the Great Powers even more.

    The Treaty of Beijing (Sino-Russian) and the Treaty on the Survey and Demarcation of the Northwest Boundary ceded more than 880,000 square kilometers east of the Ussuri River, including Sakhalin Island, and east and south of Lake Balkesh in China.

    The Treaty of Shimonoseki was signed between Li Hongzhang, a representative of compromise and concession during the Sino-Japanese War, and Japanese Prime Minister Hirobumi Ito, and it greatly deepened China's semi-colonization.

    The Treaty of Xinchou was signed during the Eight-Nation Alliance's war of aggression against China. It has placed a new and heavy burden on the Chinese people and seriously undermined China's sovereignty. From then on, the Qing Dynasty completely became a tool of imperialist domination over China. China was completely reduced to a semi-colonial, semi-feudal society.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Wrong. 1.The defeat of the Opium War made China understand the power of modern civilization and realize the disconnection between itself and modern civilization, so it began to contact and learn from modern civilization, which objectively promoted China's modernization. This cannot be said to be a "war brought".

    2.After the defeat of the Opium War, the intrusion of imported Western goods, such as missionaries, modern industry, Western medicine, modern science, etc., objectively promoted China's modernization: the subject was still not war.

    In other words, China's modernization is due to the search of Chinese (both Qing **** who maintain rule and benevolence who are self-reliant) and the spread of some foreigners (some are friends, some are just ordinary workers such as missionaries, and some are evil people with bad intentions). War is the trigger for all this, not the cause. This is not how the abbreviation works.

    Wars of aggression in themselves can only bring suffering and humiliation. Such a statement is not only politically incorrect, but also inherently linguistic, and belongs to the concept of stealing in grammatical errors.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Go find a few high school or junior high school history textbooks, which are taught by people, not Beijing, but in books.

Related questions