What are the constraints of adopting an open communication style?

What is Open Communication? What are the features? Now people want to open, no matter what happens, communicate with you face to face, explain the contradictions of the matter face to face, reason, until you accept it, so that there will be less hatred between people, and I also know where his fault is, if you don't tell him to fight secretly, no one understands who doesn't know why these contradictions happen?

It is the lack of communication, through communication, people understand some truths, understand the contradictions, understand the contradictions, understand the characteristics of communication, alleviate the unhappiness between people, and return to a normal and harmonious life.

Hello! For example, how about asking a question? How to solve the problem of quick knowing. There is more than one of these answers. This is called open communication.

If you ask me what is the most important thing in communication, I would say – be open .

But before we talk about "openness", we should first mention an important tool - Johari Window, which was proposed by two psychologists and divides all our information into 4 categories:

In these 4 categories, only the first one has a consensus area, the others have blind spots, and the last one is the largest blind spot, which neither side knows.

An efficient communication is to expand consensus and eliminate blind spots, which not only requires us to have such awareness in our minds, but also to use relevant words to guide us, which can be divided into the following two scenarios.

Communication is the interaction of two people, not a one-person performance, and when we have expressed our opinions, we can say this:

What do you think? ”

Did I make it clear? Do you have any questions? ”

I'd like to hear your opinion".

In this way, leave an open-ended ending where both parties can interact.

In addition to taking the initiative to express envy, we also have a situation of passive response, such as the other party expressing a point of view, you don't particularly agree, but you have to remind yourself at all times (you have blind spots), so you also have to have an open response.

Luo Fat's common response is three words - "inspiring", and similar expressions include "it's an idea", or "this idea is very special".

With a relatively "neutral" expression, you can avoid "talking to death" about the sky, so that communication can continue to be distributed.

Always, bring the "Johari Window" to communication, maintain openness, constantly eliminate blind spots, expand the consensus area, and make communication more efficient.

Communication should be open, not just one person, and I really have a painful lesson in this. The content of this one is relatively simple, and it is easy to remember and use because of its simplicity. Continue to learn how to communicate without flowers.

1.Maintaining openness in communication is not just about making gestures, but also about taking action, so that the other party can really feel the sincerity of "I am willing to listen to everyone's opinions", rather than duplicity.

2.About Johari window, this is indeed the first time I have seen it with the town, and I went to the Internet to collect the following information:

There is a lot of information on the Internet, and it seems that there is not enough attention to communication.

Speaking of which, I think of the communication model in another book, which I also put as a reference below:

It can be seen in many books, and a few articles in the book can be used as a common discussion, which feels easy to remember and use:

1.Build a community, say less "you" and more "we";

2.Turn on the openness to the transferor, and ask the other party's opinion every time you say something; (The suggestion is very good, not too easy to operate the reeds);

3.Universal answering routine: "It's a train of thought"; "Inspired".

In the end, I realized that communication is not knowledge, and I have not changed my views after reading several major books in the past; Communication skills need to be practiced, and they will be used tomorrow.

Answer] :d advantages of formal communication: it has a better infiltration effect, is more serious, has a strong binding force, is easy to keep confidential, and can make the information trench cover Wang Tong maintain his authority. This is the way important and authoritative information should be communicated.

Abstract Insight] Related words: openness, learn to say "we".

Openness = expanding consensus + eliminating blind spots.

Learn to open up the other person's openness. Ask the other person's opinion in each paragraph, not "Do you understand", but "Did I just make it clear?" When asking a question, you can strategically name the question, or "show a flaw" and throw a specific question to help the other person open up openness.

The significance of communication lies precisely in constantly synchronizing the "information flow" of both sides, so that the consensus will gradually become larger and the blind spot will become smaller and smaller.

Johari Window's four steps: the first step, exhaust what you know; The second step is to take stock of your own unknowns; The third step is to explore what the other party knows as much as possible; Fourth, we will explore the common unknowns of both of you, find answers together, and further expand the consensus.

The first element of asking questions is to call them by name, rather than asking for general advice.

As for the first point, first of all, I have to judge whether this person can say something, and only by coming up with new ideas can I take the lead in others.

Secondly, his opinion is most likely positive and will not embarrass you.

Third, we need to realize that the question of "who said first" is differentiated in different contexts. In a relatively strict and formal workplace, from small to large, people with low positions should speak first, and the later they go, the more like a concluding speech. On the contrary, for less formal occasions, we need them to bring rhythm to those who like to open their minds.

The second element of asking a question is to throw out a specific question.

In the communication, I also told that I would encounter a situation, that is, I am very kind and positive, but the other party does not cooperate or I do not agree with his point of view, what should I do at this time?

It is a train of thought to catch the other party's words with a universal word technique. Another similar panacea is "inspired."