Test you a logic question, and think you have strong logical ability!

The focus of the problem is one"Specialized"word, i.e. I can ask two questions or pull up.

First of all, the box on the left side of my conversation is tied with gold, and you are divided into two kinds of sunny conditions (a special word) 1Your department is correct, that is, the department, and the gold is in the box on the left.

If not, then the gold is in the box on the right.

2.Your department is wrong, the box on the left side of my conversation is tied with gold, if it's true, then you will say no, then I'll talk about the box on the right.

If you have gold, you must have said the wrong thing, and you will say no, and those two are not the box on the left.

There is gold. The other two may be the opposite of the first two bells, saying that the one on the left is without gold, and the one on the right is gold.

Actually, it's quite difficult to fully express it, and I don't know what I'm talking about.

Please ask other masters to advise you again!

If there is no gold on the left.

There's no gold on the right either, right?

That's how I asked.

If you're right, the gold is on the left.

No, gold.

It's on the right.

Your gold is in the chest on the right hand.

There's gold on the left, there's no gold on the right, right?

I can ask you: you said that the gold is in the chest on the left.

I don't have any gold in my hand or in the chest on my right, right?

That's it, and bring in what you've confirmed.

It's true that gold is on the right!

You watched Bao Qingtian 3's Tianmang reappear.

The problem is: if 1+1=2, then the chest on my left is gold.

If he answers correctly, he will be on the left, and if he is wrong, he will be on the right.

Suppose I know which chest has gold, and I'm the opposite of what you say, then guess I'll say which chest has no gold? You are referring to those who have gold.

Pointing to a box, I asked, "I said that the gold coins are in this box, would you say that is right?" ”

If you tell the truth, yes, then it's in it, and if you don't say it's right, then it's not in it.

If you tell a lie, yes, then it's inside, and if you say it's wrong, then it's not inside.

Anyway, if you're right, that's there, if you're not right, you're not there.

Is there gold in both chests? Is there gold on the left? Is there gold on the right?

There is no difference of $100.

The 3,000 yuan includes the 2,500 yuan paid to the receptionist, the 200 yuan left by the waiter and the 300 yuan returned. That is, 3000 = 2500 + 200 + 300.

What leads people astray is that this topic is: "It is equivalent to paying only 900 yuan per person for the room"! 900 yuan per person for 3 people is 2,700 yuan, but this 2,700 yuan is actually not just the room fee, including the 2,500 yuan paid to the main desk and the 200 yuan left by the waiter.

In terms of the overall result, three people are equivalent to only paying 900 yuan per person for the "room fee", but since the 2,700 yuan "room fee" has included the 200 yuan left by the waiter, adding the two when calculating the whereabouts of the money in the end is a double calculation, which is also the logical error of this question. According to the normal logic, it should be: "equivalent to" only 900 yuan per person for the room, plus the 300 yuan returned, or 3,000 yuan, there is no difference of 100 yuan.

In fact, the tenant did pay 2,700 yuan, but there was a problem with the algorithm of 3,000 yuan, and the concept was changed here. There is nothing wrong with 1000 times 3 equaling 3000; It is not bad to get 100 yuan back per person is equivalent to 900 yuan per person; The boss got 2,500 yuan and returned 500 yuan, a total of 3,000 yuan is not wrong; The guest paid 3,000 yuan, and it was not wrong to get 300 yuan back and get 2,700 yuan; There is nothing wrong with the waiter taking 500 yuan to give 300 yuan to the guest and leaving 200 yuan for himself; The tenant paid 2,700 yuan, the boss 2,500 yuan, and the waiter 200 yuan, which is not wrong; But now you have to add 2700 plus 200 to get 3000, of course it's wrong! You can see it, you are smart.

In fact, they only spent 2,700 yuan.

This includes 2500 per room.

Waiter's tip of 200.

It doesn't make sense to say that 3000 is actually unreasonable.

It seems reasonable, but it's really useless.

Calculation formula: 2500 + 200 = 2700

Because the three of them paid a total of 2,500 yuan (the main desk) + 200 yuan (the waiter kept it himself) + 300 yuan (returned to the guest), so the understanding is not bad 100 yuan.

Don't think so.

This equates to a total of 2700

The 2700 boss 2500 the waiter 200

If you have to add it.

It's just that a total of 2700 + 300 returned = 3000

Like wolves, sheep, cabbage, or whatever.

Programming should do the trick.

Why are that old man and old lady so bad... = =

This reasoning is wrong because the first "masses" are collective concepts, while the second "masses" are class concepts.

Set Concepts and Non-Set Concepts (Class Concepts) Set Concepts: Concepts that reflect a collection of individual things.

The aggregate is an indivisible organic whole. A property that aggregates have, but individual things don't.

Non-set concepts: Concepts that reflect a class of things. The properties that a class concept has, individual things must have.

The answer is useful, please click Adopt.

Question 1 Observe that the black beads are proportional to the growth of the sequence of 2 0 2 1 2 2 ......And each set of black beads has a white bead in front of it, 2 8=256, which is more than 200, 2 7=128, so you can see that there are only 8 white beads in the first 200, so there are 192 black beads.

Question 2: Because after Company A finished speaking, Manager Sun said, It means that the manager of Company A is not surnamed Sun, because he is filming "Ode to the Yellow River" and is not surnamed Huang, but can only be surnamed Bai, excluding that Company A C and Company B are filming "Monkey King", so the manager of Company B is not surnamed Sun, so the answer is B

Question 3 The concept of stealing and changing The total number before and after the return is 27 9 yuan per person per day The boss gets 25 yuan The guy gets 2 yuan 27 = 25 + 2 Established You can't add up the money that the guest and the guy get.

Question 4 Condition 123 Synthesis: White and yellow are opposites of each other, and blue and green are opposites of each other, so choose C

Question 5 8 x(3+3 8)=27

Probably means that it may or may not, not necessarily not.

It may not rain, it may not rain, it may be true at the same time against the relationshipIt is impossible not to rain, double negation, equivalent to, it must rain today.

It is possible to quit that it may rain.

But it may rain, it may or will definitely rain.

The possible definition of extension is:

Maybe, may not, will not be, not necessarily, no] all four of these situations are true, 2 is also true.

Non-classical logic, also artificially defined.

3.It must not rain, the contradictory relationship, it must be wrong.

4.Not that it has to rain today is true.

The opposition means that two propositions must have one falsehood, which can be the same false; The next objection means that two propositions must have one truth, which can be the same truth.

Paradox: It may rain, it must not rain.

Under the opposition relationship: it may or may not rain. There is also a chance that it can be the same as true modal logic, and once upon a time, this also involved time.

Modal logic Modal logic, it's easy to figure out the possible definitions.

The reference sentence is identified as:

Possible if it "maybe" true (whether it's actually true or not);

Necessarily if it is "impossible" to be false;

Accidental If it is "not" it must be true, that is, it may be true or false. Accidental truths are truths that are "actually" true, but "may have never been".

No, but the handwriting is good, kudo.