Urgently need a 1000 word summary of the work of the Challenge Cup.

Mainly write about the content of the work, the achievements, and the shortcomings, and finally put forward reasonable suggestions or new directions... **: Summary, is to conduct a comprehensive and systematic general inspection, general evaluation, general analysis, total research of a period of time, analysis of achievements, deficiencies, experience, etc.

Summarizing is a type of applied writing, which is the rational thinking of the work that has already been done. Summarizing and planning are complementary to each other, and it is necessary to take the plan as the basis, and the formulation of the plan is always carried out on the basis of personal experience. Basic Requirements for Summarizing 1 The summary must have an overview and narrative of the situation, some of which are relatively simple, and some of which are more detailed.

This part mainly analyzes the subjective and objective conditions of work, favorable and unfavorable conditions, as well as the working environment and foundation. 2 Achievements and shortcomings. This is the center of the summary.

The purpose of summarizing is to affirm the achievements and find out the shortcomings. What are the achievements, how big are them, what are the aspects, and how they were achieved; It should be clearly explained how many shortcomings there are, in which aspects, in what nature, and how they arise. 3 Lessons learned.

Having done something, there will always be experiences and lessons. In order to facilitate future work, it is necessary to analyze, study, generalize, and concentrate the experiences and lessons learned from past work, and to raise the level of theory to understand. Future plans.

According to the tasks and requirements of the future work, draw on the experience and lessons of the previous period, clarify the direction of efforts, and put forward improvement measures. This is the basis for analysis and drawing lessons. 2 Be organized.

The summary is written for people to read, and if it is not well organized, people will not be able to read it, and even if they read it, they will not know why, so the purpose of the summary will not be achieved. 3 It should be cut appropriately and appropriately. Materials are essential and phenomenal; There are important and secondary, and when writing, we should remove the essence from the details.

The questions in the summary should be divided into priority and detail, and the details should be detailed, and the details should be omitted. Basic format of summary 1, title 2, body Beginning: overview of the situation, overall evaluation; The outline is summarized and the whole text is summarized.

Subject: Analyze the shortcomings of the achievements and summarize the lessons learned. Ending:

Analyze the problem and clarify the direction. 3. Signature, date.

I have not done very well before, it is rough, do you want it.

1. Quickly and cost-effectively acquire the knowledge and skills system of entrepreneurship.

In the process of making an entrepreneurial plan, participants will fully accept the knowledge and skill system that entrepreneurs should possess through systematic training, learning and communication provided by the competition.

2. Form a partner with an experimental nature of entrepreneurship.

Through the competition, participants can meet future entrepreneurial partners, and the members of the participating group will be most likely to form entrepreneurial partnerships and create successful businesses in the future.

3. Quickly establish a business relationship network for entrepreneurship.

Through the competition, participants can meet venture capitalists. Domestic venture capitalists have expressed strong interest in this competition and will conduct an investment feasibility analysis of works with practical operation value. Entrants can fully demonstrate to venture capitalists the huge market prospects of their products and services, and win funds for further entrepreneurship.

Participants will also meet people from the business and legal professions and build a good business network for future start-ups.

4. Establish a good relationship with entrepreneurship in advance.

Many news organizations are paying more attention to the national competition. In this way, you can get a rare opportunity to recommend yourself and the overall image of the product to the society, and establish a good relationship for future entrepreneurship.

5. Obtain valuable communication opportunities with low investment in a short period of time.

The outstanding teams will have the opportunity to further exchange and learn from the outstanding teams from other universities in the future higher-level entrepreneurship plan competitions, and each team can brainstorm and broaden their ideas in these exchange activities.

6. Establish and cultivate team spirit.

Contestants will have the opportunity to join a group full of wisdom and energy, and join hands with their group partners to take on the challenge. Participants will experience the power of motivating each other as they move forward, the leap of inspiration in communication, and the joy of sharing when they succeed. In the process, participants will feel the power of team spirit, which will be a new experience.

7. Improve your overall quality in a short period of time.

By participating in the competition, participants can gain a global grasp of the product and service from idea to reality. In the process of completing the business plan, develop communication skills, persuasion skills, and organizational skills. In the process of accepting challenges, enhance the courage, confidence and ability to start a business.

You can find it on the Saicai network.,But this kind of thing is confidential.,So it's rare.,Only one or two.。。。

I can't send the link... Remnant thoughts... Find out for yourself on the forum of Saicai.com.

If you can ask the results here, you will basically be cheated by the academic committee, and academic corruption is prohibited!

Ahem, how do you say this?

You can check it out on the official website.

However, there are many kinds of works in the Challenge Cup.

Especially there are a lot of designs and productions.

How do you post this?

However, there are also social surveys.

I'm sorry that we accidentally got a third prize in a **...

Now the original is not in the company.

I'll show you a chance later.

Let's take a look on the official website first.

Ha, I'll help you find it.

This is the award-winning catalogue of **.

I'll look for the specifics.

Okay, find one.

But it's not the original, and some ** can't be pasted.

The main difference between the two is that the competition items are different and the focus of the competition is different

1. The "Big Challenge" is the "Challenge Cup" extracurricular academic and scientific works competition for college students, and the entries can be scientific research achievements, scientific and technological inventions and creations, and social survey reports. The "Small Pick" is the "Challenge Cup" college student entrepreneurship plan competition, which is to make a business plan for a project, and the paper file is a business plan.

2. The challenge pays attention to the practical significance and characteristics of academic scientific and technological inventions and creations, and examines students' scientific and technological innovation ability, concern for social problems and their ability to analyze and solve problems. The small pick pays more attention to the perfect combination of market and technical services, and is more commercial;Students are tested on their business sensitivity to the project (feasibility and innovation of the project), their understanding of the industry to which the project belongs, and the qualities they should have as an entrepreneur.

3. The small pick awards are set up as gold awards, silver awards, and bronze awards, while the big pick is set up with special prizes, first prizes, second prizes, and third prizesThe universities that initiate the big pick can report six works, three of which are directly promoted by the universities, and the other three must be recommended through negotiation with the organizers of the provincial competition, while the small pick can only recommend three works to enter the national competition.

4, the big pick has academic restrictions and the small pick does not, the big pick is divided into the undergraduate group, the master group, the doctoral group separately reviewed, the big pick national competition can be reported up to eight people, and the small pick can be reported up to ten people, the big pick competition certificate covered by the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, the National Federation of Students, the host of the people's chapter, and the small pick certificate only covers the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, the National Federation of Students.

The "Challenge Cup" competition has two parallel projects in China, one is the "Challenge Cup" Chinese College Student Entrepreneurship Plan Competition, referred to as Xiaojiao; The other is the "Challenge Cup" National College Students' Extracurricular Academic Science and Technology Works Competition, referred to as the Big Challenge.

1. The focus of the two competitions is different, the big pick pays attention to the practical significance and characteristics brought by the creation of academic scientific and technological inventions, while the small pick pays more attention to the perfect combination of market and technical services, and is more commercial.

2. The small pick awards are set up as gold awards, silver awards, and bronze awards, while the big pick is set up as special prizes, first prizes, second prizes, and third prizes.

3. The colleges and universities that initiate the big pick can report six works, three of which are directly promoted by the universities, and the other three must be recommended through negotiation with the provincial competition organizers, while the small pick can only recommend three works to enter the national competition.

4. The big selection has academic restrictions and the small selection does not, and the large selection is divided into the undergraduate group, the master group, and the doctoral group for separate evaluation.

5. A maximum of eight people can be reported for the big national competition, and a maximum of ten people can be reported for the small challenge.

6. The certificate of the big pick competition is stamped with the seal of the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, the All-China Federation of Students, and the people of the host city, while the certificate of the small pick is only stamped with the seal of the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, and the All-China Federation of Students.

The "Challenge Cup" competition has two parallel projects in China, one is the "Challenge Cup" Chinese College Student Entrepreneurship Plan Competition, referred to as Xiaojiao; The other is the "Challenge Cup" National College Students' Extracurricular Academic Science and Technology Works Competition, referred to as the Big Challenge.

1. The focus of the two competitions is different, the big pick pays attention to the practical significance and characteristics brought by the creation of academic scientific and technological inventions, while the small pick pays more attention to the perfect combination of market and technical services, and is more commercial.

2. The small pick awards are set up as gold awards, silver awards, and bronze awards, while the big pick is set up as special prizes, first prizes, second prizes, and third prizes.

3. The colleges and universities that initiate the big pick can report six works, three of which are directly promoted by the universities, and the other three must be recommended through negotiation with the provincial competition organizers, while the small pick can only recommend three works to enter the national competition.

4. The big selection has academic restrictions and the small selection does not, and the large selection is divided into the undergraduate group, the master group, and the doctoral group for separate evaluation.

5. A maximum of eight people can be reported for the big national competition, and a maximum of ten people can be reported for the small challenge.

6. The certificate of the big pick competition is stamped with the seal of the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, the All-China Federation of Students, and the people of the host city, while the certificate of the small pick is only stamped with the seal of the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, and the All-China Federation of Students.

The "Challenge Cup" BAI competition is in the middle of the competition.

There are two parallel projects in DU country, one is the "Challenge Cup" DAO China College Student Entrepreneurship Plan Competition, which is simply called Xiaojiao; The other is the "Challenge Cup" National College Students' Extracurricular Academic Science and Technology Works Competition, referred to as the big pick, the two focus on the competition is different, the big pick pays attention to the practical significance and characteristics of academic scientific and technological invention and creation, and the small pick pays more attention to the perfect combination of market and technical services, and the commercial is stronger, the small pick award is set up as the gold award, the silver award, the bronze award, and the big pick set up the special prize, the first prize, the second prize, the third prize, the big pick initiates the university can report six works, three of which are directly promoted by the university, The other three should be recommended through consultation with the provincial competition organizers, and the small pick can only recommend three works into the national competition, the big pick has academic restrictions and the small pick does not, the big pick is divided into the undergraduate group, the master group, the doctoral group is reviewed separately, the big pick national competition can be reported up to eight people, and the small pick can be reported up to ten people, the big pick competition certificate covers the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, the National Federation of Students, and the local people's chapter, and the small pick certificate only covers the Communist Youth League, the China Association for Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education, and the National Federation of Students.