Help, everybody! Gather information! A debate tournament needs to be used!!

In debating this issue, the key is to make a fuss about the concept of "quality education," which is clearly explained in the State Education Commission's "Several Opinions on Actively Promoting the Implementation of Quality Education in Primary and Secondary Schools at Present": "Quality education is education with the purpose of improving the quality of the nation. It is an education based on the national education policy stipulated in the "Education Law", focusing on the requirements of the long-term development of the educated and the society, with the fundamental purpose of facing all students and comprehensively improving the basic quality of students, and focusing on cultivating the attitudes and abilities of the educated, and promoting their vivid, lively and active development in moral, intellectual, and physical aspects.

Judging from this concept, quality education is undoubtedly comprehensive and correct, and since the concept of quality education is comprehensive education, it should become the only means to test the success of a school.

The problem is that China's current quality education has changed its flavor throughout the country, and to talk about quality education is to cultivate students' interests and abilities in all aspects, such as dance, art, calligraphy, and so on, and only pay attention to these, which is actually a one-sided understanding of quality education. Moral education, aesthetic education, and labor education are still neglected.

Moreover, the key to the failure of China's education lies not in this, but in the evaluation of education by society, parents and parents. At present, the evaluation standard for education in society is mainly based on test results, good grades, and good results in the college entrance examination, that is, success, otherwise everything is not to be discussed. Under such an educational evaluation system, how can schools not pay attention to test-oriented education?

How can it be possible to spend too much energy on quality education?

The solution to this problem will not happen overnight, but will depend on the change of the concept of education for all and the adjustment of the education system.

Positive: The success of the quality of education is the only means to test the success of a school, because without good educational quality, it will never succeed!

Opposite: The success of the quality of education is not the only way to test the success of a school, because it is not enough to rely on this alone, but also on various other elements to succeed!

This needs to be based on the title, which is nothing more than two parts, one is the discussion, and the other is the example. Let's talk about the topic, and everyone can help you.

First, enterprises should seek innovation in development, my reason is that if the enterprise does not develop, it is impossible to mention innovation, do you think a bankrupt enterprise still needs any innovation.

Second, developing enterprises need to innovate because they need to move forward.

Third, innovation needs capital investment, personnel investment, how can an enterprise without development have such energy and spare strength to do.

Fourth, development is the premise of enterprise survival, innovation is only a way or method, development is always the premise.