In future wars, will the role of individual soldiers become smaller and smaller?

You're wrong. Improving the combat capability of individual soldiers is precisely the necessity for the development of future warfare. Future wars will certainly not be able to conduct large-scale ground wars, and live divisional wars.

Then, it has become an urgent matter to improve the combat capability of individual soldiers, and only when the combat ability of individual soldiers is improved, and everyone has the ability to do the same thing as 007, can we win the future high-precision war. To this end, all countries are inventing their own individual combat systems, such as the United States' "Land Warrior", with the help of high technology, to improve the lethality, survivability, flexibility and target acquisition ability of soldiers, and integrate individual soldiers and five subsystems: ** subsystem, integrated helmet subsystem, computer radio electronic system (CRS), software subsystem, protective clothing and individual equipment subsystem, for five types of army infantry needs:

Commandos, Airborne Troops, Air Assault Personnel, Personnel of Light Load and Mechanized Troops.

The XM8** was also developed to improve individual soldier capabilities.

Therefore, in the future, the role of individual soldiers is getting bigger and bigger, and the combat ability of individual soldiers is also constantly improving, you should have an experience when you play Lightning Action, all tasks are completed by individuals independently, and this game is also used in some countries to improve the simulation of individual combat capabilities.

The unpleasant thing about individual soldiers is that they go to clean the battlefield, tanks and planes can advance quickly, but in the end it is the individual soldiers who complete the occupation, and the enemy troops in some bunkers also have to rely on individual soldiers to clean up. Therefore, the role of individual soldiers is smaller than before, but it is still indispensable.

There is indeed a tendency to see that with the entry into service of high technology, especially unmanned, the infantry is far less "important" than it used to be. However, we should also see that the infantry is also advancing with science and technology, such as the "future individual soldier system" and "soldier exoskeleton" developed by some developed countries.

In addition, soldiers also have the advantage of other ** equipment that cannot be compared, and in the foreseeable future, individual soldiers will also be the most basic unit of war.

On the contrary, future wars will be mainly small-scale, usually squad-scale battles, and the requirements for individual soldiers will be higher.

If there is no individual soldier to go deep into the enemy's territory to guide the fighter plane, then it is impossible for the aircraft to carry out precision strikes, and it is impossible for the missiles to hit accurately, and the role of individual soldiers cannot be replaced!

It can only be said that although it is getting smaller and smaller, the infantry will always be the decisive force in the war, whether it is with planes or tanks or something else, in the end there must be infantry to solve the battle.

What does it mean? Could it be that you're referring to the robot wars of the future?

Oh, you're referring to the fact that the role of infantry is getting smaller and smaller.

In the face of the current high-tech **, of course, you can't use crowd tactics as before, but this doesn't mean that you can win the war without relying on people, isn't there still so many infantry in Iraq?

Of course, with the development of automation, many things that were previously done by people will be replaced by machines, and the pinnacle of automation is robots.

If the role of individual soldiers is getting smaller and smaller, why are countries still increasing the development of future infantry individual systems? Although the development of equipment now and in the future will become more and more advanced, the role of infantry is still irreplaceable. Games and reality are not the same.

It should be said that in future wars, individual soldiers will be able to provide combat assistance to other troops, and their role will be even greater.

The form of future warfare will depend mainly on the purpose of the war, the level of science and technology, and the attitude towards the enemy.

Clause. 1. The purpose of future wars is to fight for the right to exist. Throughout history, although the ultimate purpose of warfare is to survive, the direct purpose of war is varied, such as after the opening of new shipping routes, Western colonizers mainly wanted to obtain spices, colonies, gold and silver.

1. Conventional warfare is more refined.

2. Cyber warfare (paralyzing the opponent's command system, stealing intelligence, stealing wealth, etc.).

3. Chemical warfare (destroying some species of the other side through chemical products, and then destroying other species by other methods: the use of chemical herbicides makes locust trees lose their leaves, inhibits growth, and the common people change to poplars, and as a result, the American white moth causes poplars to be wiped out. Controlling each other with chemical drugs is like being addicted to drugs.

4. Biological warfare (invasion of alien species, American white moth, etc.).

5. Genetic viruses (such as SARS virus, etc., use insects, rivers, rainfall, food, water supply systems, etc., to enter the human body system and destroy people who meet certain genetic characteristics.)

6. Meteorology**: Manipulating climate changes to cause harm to certain countries. Droughts and floods, for example, disrupt food production. 7. Cultural aggression: games, pornography, 8. Supporting ** people: big spies, formulating policies conducive to foreign invasion, making it very easy for foreign-funded enterprises to control many industries in China, according to the data released by Xinhua News Agency, 21 of China's 28 industries are now controlled by foreign capital. If foreign capital controls basic industries, such as urban water supply and salt, China's fate can be imagined.

9. Opportunity to learn English: learning English for all, large-scale projects (such as F4 racing, F4 held in China is much more expensive than in foreign countries, golf courses, world expos, etc.).

10. Financial war: speculation on real estate, etc. (in "Food War", Qi bought a certain type of product of Chu in order to destroy Chu State).

(1) Strong controllability of war (from the point of view of the purpose and means of achieving war, high-tech warfare has the characteristics of strong controllability);

2) Vast battlefield space (from the perspective of the field and scope of warfare, high-tech warfare has the characteristics of an unprecedentedly vast battlefield space);

3) Prominent systemic confrontation (judging from the manifestations of warfare, high-tech warfare has the characteristics of systematic confrontation);

4) Diversification of combat methods (judging from the development and changes of combat means, high-tech warfare has the characteristics of diversification of combat methods);

5) Automation of command and control (judging from the effectiveness of the use of combat forces, high-tech warfare has the characteristics of automation of command and control);

6) The consumption of war is huge (from the perspective of the requirements for logistical support, high-tech warfare has the characteristics of huge consumption).