Debate anti side , please elaborate

You take the exam, the teacher looks at the ranking, this is a kind of competition.

The skills of the debate competition, especially the opposing side, must catch the loopholes of the positive side. You have to be good at taking advantage of his language loopholes so that you can fight back effectively.

Courage to move forward: positive understanding is to rush forward without fear of difficulties, but the opposite is a lack of brains, lack of wisdom, only brute strength and find another way: it is to know the current affairs, to be able to change flexibly.

Debate tournament tips, especially for the opposing side:

1.1. The debater must be familiar with the rules of debate.

2.Self-presentation.

3.Session excavation.

4.Arrangement of the pleading.

5.Be organized.

6.The words are positive.

Square: 1If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust.

2.The "lie" itself is dark, and the white lie itself is falsehood. Although he took off the cheongsam worn by the beggar, he still could not escape the essence of his lie, and a lie meant deception, and thus hindered integrity.

The starting point of a white lie is good, but often once this lie is exposed, the damage to the other party will be deeper. 3.In my opinion, distrusting others is not only irresponsible to oneself, but also disrespectful to others, and even to others, causing losses to the interests of the collective.

The most important thing is to lose the trust of others. 4.Zi said:

People have no faith, and they don't know what they can do. "I think that if people don't be trustworthy, they will have no place in society and they will not be able to do anything. A "lie" is called a "lie" because it is a false, untrue, and deceitful word.

If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust. 5.Another point is that if you tell a lie, it may use many more lies to round that lie, and there is a high probability that lying will become a habit, and lying, it will be like a snowball, and it will get bigger and bigger.

Opposite: 1White lies are beautiful, and when we tell small lies in moderation for the sake of the happiness and hope of others, lies become understanding, respect, and tolerance.

Who doesn't want to be understood, respected, and tolerated? So, I think it's still necessary to tell a few white lies in our lives. 2.

White lies, all kinds of white lies from the starting point and result, are all to protect the other party's emotions, maintain the other party's mental health and pleasure, and are a kind of humanistic spirit. Because of the existence of white lies, the world will become better, warmer and more harmonious, and the world will be full of sunshine. 3.

When a terminally ill patient is sentenced to death by doctors, his parents, lovers, children, and all his relatives will not directly tell him: "Life cannot be saved" or "At most, how long can I live in this world?" They all use white lies to encourage patients, so that they can cooperate with the doctors, and the opposing party can't blame these people for being dishonest, right?

Although these are all truths, who would be so cruel as a judge to sentence a prisoner to death, telling the truth to his relatives who are already sick? Is this an undermine to integrity?

1. Square: the claim

Counterclaim: The counterclaim

2. Positive: Wu Yankuan positive side: negative side

3. affirmative side: negative side

Summary. Dear judges and students, hello everyone. Today, on behalf of my important opponents, I would like to elaborate on the question of "whether cashless payments should be promoted" and express my views on today's debate.

First of all, we all know that cashless payments have become a trend. With the continuous advancement of technology and people's pursuit of convenience, cashless payment methods are rapidly gaining popularity around the world, which does bring many conveniences and advantages. However, I think there are also some problems and shortcomings in promoting cashless payments.

First, because cashless payments are digitally processed, the risk of a failure of an electronic system or a hacker can pose a potential threat to property security and personal information leakage. This risk is too much for both individuals and institutions to bear. Second, cashless payments can also lead to a widening gap between the rich and the poor in society, especially for those who lack the knowledge of electronic payment equipment and related technologies.

These people may not be able to participate in cashless payments, which exposes them to more unfair treatment and social exclusion. To sum up, I think it is biased to blindly represent the view of "promoting cashless payments". We should be more rational about the pros and cons of cashless payments, and fully weigh their advantages and disadvantages, so as to maintain information security and fairness and justice while continuously advancing modernization.

Dear, let me give you an example to refer to the <>

Dear judges and students, hello everyone. Today, on behalf of my important opponents, I would like to elaborate on the question of "whether cashless payments should be promoted" and express my views on today's debate. First of all, we all know that cashless payments have become a trend.

With the continuous advancement of technology and people's pursuit of convenience, cashless payment methods are rapidly gaining popularity around the world, which does bring many conveniences and advantages. However, I think there are also some problems and shortcomings in promoting cashless payments. First, because cashless payments are digitally processed, the risk of a failure of an electronic system or a hacker can pose a potential threat to property security and personal information leakage.

This risk is too much for both individuals and institutions to bear. Second, cashless payments can also lead to a widening gap between the rich and the poor in society, especially for those who lack the knowledge of electronic payment equipment and related technologies. These people may not be able to participate in cashless payments, exposing them to more unfair treatment and social exclusion.

To sum up, I think it is biased to blindly represent the view of "promoting the payment of Zheng Jin without cash and closing the door". We should be more rational about the pros and cons of cashless payments, and fully weigh their advantages and disadvantages, so as to maintain information security and fairness while continuously advancing modernization.