Open Book Beneficial Debate! I want heads and tails! Thank you

I think it's beneficial to open the book. The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said:"As long as it's reading, there's always something good".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial.

Gorky once said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." "The bookkeepers have been around since ancient times, and there is the "Mr. Wuliu" reading method of "not seeking to understand"; There are also Zhu Guangqian's advocacy of "scrutinizing the words and chewing the words" reading method; There are also Wang Guowei's so-called three reading realms ......But at the end of the day, open books are beneficial.

You may be wondering, why do you talk about this? It's simple, it's key"Total"Word. This is saying that there will always be good, not only good.

Therefore, to say that the book is beneficial, it needs to be argued that reading is beneficial rather than harmful. (Don't get caught up in the opposite side.) Otherwise, you will definitely lose.

The reason will be understood after reading the following)

As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, a few points can be made to argue that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.

Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.

But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.

That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.