Open the book is beneficial to the debate, both positive and negative, to use your own words, not cl

The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said:"As long as it's reading, there's always something good".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial.

You may be wondering, why do you talk about this? It's simple, it's key"Total"Word. This is saying that there will always be good, not only good.

Therefore, to say that the book is beneficial, it needs to be argued that reading is beneficial rather than harmful. (Don't get caught up in the opposite side.) Otherwise, you will definitely lose.

The reason will be understood after reading the following)

As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, a few points can be made to argue that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.

Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.

But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.

That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.

As for"Unbook is not necessarily beneficial", is a neutral word, half of it is (beneficial) is true, but the other half - unhelpful - unhelpful is problematic: unhelpful, not harmful. Just like a car driving on the road, it doesn't fly into the blue sky like an airplane, can it be said that it is burrowing into the ground?

Suppose the argument is"Open book is harmful", then according to some of the arguments just now, it is natural that it can also be established, but to say"Unhelpful"That's wrong. So, on this issue, the argument of the opposing side is only half right. (And this half is still a positive argument)

I am the opposite, and the teacher is also in favor of the opposite, I don't think opening the book is necessarily beneficial!

I'm the opposite, I won't help you.

If you open the book blindly, it may not be beneficial.

People who can read all kinds of books are afraid that they can't do anything. This famous saying is that a person who reads everything can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may behave badly.

Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he understands that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining a mine."

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Red dates are harmful to your teeth; The medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you." If you have a one-sided understanding of "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not true!

We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read.

So, I want you to remember that opening a book is not necessarily beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

No, it's not okay like Ah Yuan, low-level fun! @#

Open books are not necessarily beneficial, and there are some illegals who read some bad books, such as (Sky Wolf).

"Open book is beneficial" sounds fine, but when you think about it, the problem comes out. How can we say that just reading books is good for us. There are good books and bad books, of course good books are good for us, if they are bad books, is it good for us?

Reading books may not be beneficial, because some books are really not suitable for us children and teenagers, not because the books are not well-published, but because the content of some books will affect our physical and mental health, and our thoughts will follow, so it will affect learning.

Open books are not necessarily beneficial, it should be because some books are not beneficial to teenagers, reading books is advocated, but there are a lot of bad books that are disturbing, read too much, you will hide, and if you are addicted, you will imitate the actions in bad books, but it is not that you can't read any books, I recommend you to read children's literature.

I don't think it's necessarily beneficial to open the book. It is true that reading books can increase people's knowledge, cultivate their temperament, and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening the book" is only a necessary condition for "benefit", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened.

If someone looks at romance, it may not be beneficial to open the book.