The pursuit of money and morality cannot be debated in parallel

Of course, the pursuit of money and morality can go hand in hand, which requires us to establish a correct view of money and see that money still has a certain role in today's society. But money should be treated in a proper way and in moderation.

The pursuit of money and morality can go hand in hand with policy forces, such as: A gentleman loves money and takes it in a good way. Cultivated people can earn money through their own personal hard work.

If you want to achieve the unity of the current pursuit and morality, then there is an old saying, which is very suitable for this case, that is, a gentleman loves money and takes it in a good way, and we can make money by taking it legally.

It is said that in today's society, you can't live without money, but you can't pursue money excessively, we know that morality is the first, and a gentleman takes money. It can be said that a gentleman has a way, so it also means that he must pay attention to morality and cannot do illegal and disciplinary acts.

It is impossible to go hand in hand, money is an economic problem, and morality is a new human problem.

This should have the same strategic force, and this social force is also very important, and then it can also be adjusted according to one of his establishments, so when pursuing money and morality, we must also respect and abide by this kind of rule.

To illustrate, it is. Part-time workers are honest and do their jobs well. And then earn your own salary.

Hello, not everyone is after money, morality is something that must be pursued, because money is not so much for everyone

There should be, as long as there are reasonable assets** that do not violate the moral bottom line.

"Seeking" means to seek and seek with all one's might. "Unified" means to be united. The explanation of "money pursuit" is, first of all, to put the possession of wealth in the first place, and to obtain the maximum return with the least investment.

"Moral pursuit" is the search for the noble realm of goodness, justice, fairness, and honesty. It means putting the interests of others and society first, striving to give as much as possible and take as little as possible. The two are contradictory and conflicting with each other, and it is difficult to merge into a whole.

In this case, philanthropists such as Chen Guangbiao belong to giving up the pursuit of money for the sake of moral pursuit, while the legitimate business behavior of ordinary entrepreneurs to pursue corporate profits belongs to giving up moral "pursuit" for the pursuit of money. It is obvious that the two are inherently contradictory in nature if the process of a rich man's good deeds is simply a mere offering without a return, and if his good deeds are for the sake of a good name and thus for the greater good. Most people find a balance between following ethics and getting money, but partial balance does not mean complete unity.

Of course, professional ethics also belong to morality, and to solve this problem, we still need to start from the subjective will, highlighting the word "pursuit", and the objective "fulfillment" is not equal to the subjective "pursuit". Highlighting the subjective level of "pursuit", people always choose the weight of the two interests when making choices, and the pursuit of money and moral pursuit are often contradictory.

The Emperor and Confucius.

They have a fortune.

Others, think for yourself, so that you can also make your arguments smooth.

In the end, the good man has a safe life! Amitabha

Pornography, gambling and drugs are all ah, what you have to do is to dismantle the examples put forward by the other party, and your examples can't explain the problem.