How similar is the Athlon AMD A4 3300 processor to Enter Core i?

The latter is good, in terms of technology, AMD is slightly inferior to Intel on the mobile platform, my own computer is AMD A6-3400M, except for the slower boot response, everything else can be. The performance must choose the Core I series, but the economy is still AMD A6 3420M, when I bought the computer, I first looked at a Core i3 book, he said to let it to 4400 not to let it, and then I saw this AMD, he said 4000, I bought it. Physical quad-core and dual-core are incomparable.

AMD A6 3420M main frequency is,The maximum turbo frequency A6 3420M and Core i3 have a fight,The first A6** is low,The second A6 is a physical quad-core,i3 is only dual-core。 According to netizens, the AMD A6 is about the same as the i5 after overclocking. Of course there is no comparison with i7.

In short, choose Core I for performance, and AMD for economy. Everyone likes it. In addition, AMD A6 3420M is an APU, which is a new product that combines CPU and GPU.

In addition, in addition to his own graphics card, he can also work with other graphics cards at the same time to improve performance, while the Core i can only choose one of the two graphics cards to use, which effect do you say is better?

It's a little bit worse than i3, you say it's much worse than i5.

It is recommended to buy AMD higher U My computer is AMD Athlon630 and I plan to buy AMD 950 and my motherboard is Gigabyte 7770T us3

CPU performance is always said that 631 is the mid-range down, A4-5300 is low-end, naturally 631 is better, but 631 does not integrate graphics cards. If the requirements are really low, just play small games online in the office, you can choose A4-5300, otherwise, you still choose 631 (more recommended) + independent display, or A6, A8 APU.

CPU performance ladder diagram attached:

According to CPU performance, the 631 is better, but the 631 does not come with an integrated graphics card.

The performance of the 631 is much better.

However, the 631 does not have an integrated graphics card.

The CPU performance has to be much better than the AMD631.

。。Intel CPUs with comparable performance to A4-3400 processors, including Core2 6700 and E7200. Compared to the Celeron G530, the performance is about 11% lower.

The A4 is the entry-level performance that is not as good as the Athlon 2 250

Probably a little stronger than the 65's Athlon.

As for the graphics card, the performance is equal to 520 (must be dual-channel), but the 9500 is decisively stronger than the 520.

So if you have a new computer, you haven't upgraded.

The CPU part is equal to not upgrading the graphics card part is not as good as your 9500GT

The CPU part of the A4 is about 30% lower than the Celeron G530, which has more than 200 pieces, except for the discontinued one, I really can't find an Intel CPU that can be the same level as the A4

Is the memory unorganized dual-channel? 64 bits for a single channel and 128 bits for a dual channel, doubling the bit width.

A4 3400 is better than E3300 I don't know how much, how can I say quite, this may be that the driver is not well decorated, or the system optimization is not good,

The APU series is the only CPU series in AMD's product line that integrates the graphics core, which is internally divided into CPU core module and GPU core module.

The CPU part of the APU uses an improved version of the core, which is not fundamentally different from the previous generation of Athlon II series, so the performance has not been significantly improved, and the performance of the new model has not opened a gap with the old model, which is also the reason why some people cannot accept it.

However, the highlight of the APU series is in the GPU module, which is equivalent to the integration of a discrete graphics card core, and the performance of the same grade is much stronger than that of the opponent. Intel's Core I series also integrates GPU modules, but the performance is mediocre, and the highlight is in the performance of the CPU module.

The current games are biased towards graphics card performance, so if you compare the two, although the CPU performance of the APU is far weaker than that of the opponent, it is enough for ordinary people to use, the key is that the GPU performance is relatively strong, and the game performance is much stronger than the opponent. Intel's CPU focuses on CPU performance, and is very advantageous in software applications that focus on computing, such as ** orange slag code, graphic design, etc.

So how to choose, but also depends on your application focus, if you want to play 3D games, then the APU notebook is undoubtedly more suitable for you, if it is just an ordinary office luck, Internet applications, then choose which one can meet your needs, if you often use some software that needs to be calculated and rendered, then the Intel platform is more suitable for you.

APU is a collection of graphics cards,There are not as many people as you say are biased,Low-end,Cover Hui is super cost-effective,In addition, the power is very considerable,If you don't want to sell graphics cards,A4,Otherwise, it must be i3