Is there anything wrong with this or how to say it?

It's basically no problem, except for sent, email words just change send, or add a last sentence, can you let me know when and where it will be sent

The spoken words are a bit tongue-twisting, and if it's colloquial, I like to say this:

could you please tell me if the is one hundred percent sure (for sure) to send me the i-20. if it's sure, can i ask when and where it would be sent? thank you very much!

I'd probably prefer this expression. could you please tell me if the is sure to send me the i-20？ if it is sure.

may i ask when and where it will be send.？thank you very much.

There is a problem. The phrase "resolutely put an end to the recurrence of such incidents" is a sick sentence, which commits the mistake of duplicating the components and erecting the base of the redundancy, because "elimination" has the meaning of cutting off the surplus, blocking, and completely stopping it, that is to say, "elimination" contains "resolutely", so the word "resolutely" needs to be deleted. The correct sentence would be "to prevent the recurrence of such incidents".

Sick sentence:

A sick sentence refers to a sentence that has something wrong. Any sentence that violates the laws of grammatical structure (i.e., grammatical errors) or objective facts (i.e., logical errors) is a sick sentence, the former is called a logical error, and the latter is called a logical error. Among them, the number of grammatical errors is relatively high.

How to modify the sick sentence:Complement: It is mostly used to modify sentences with incomplete components.

For example: "In this competition, I won first place. Missing subject) changed:

In this competition, I won first place. "After listening to the teacher's words, (I) received a great education. Everyone should (establish) lofty ideals.

Complement predicate) We want to carry out patriotism (education) among teenagers. Deletion: It is generally used to modify sentences such as repetition and redundancy, redundant components, mixed sentence structure, inconsistencies, improper collocation and improper classification.

For example: "I concluded that it would probably rain tomorrow." ”

Change: "I concluded that it would rain tomorrow. ”

Substitution: Nucleus is often used to modify sentences such as improper collocation, improper wording, and unclear references.

For example: "There has been a noticeable increase in his grades. ”

Change: "There has been a noticeable improvement in his grades. ”

Whoever (violates) the discipline will be criticized.

There has been a noticeable (improved) improvement in his writing.

He seems to have an inexhaustible strength in his body.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Modify the sentence.

Judging from the translation of the fruit of the sedan chair.

This sentence is stuffy and unscrupulous.

When there is a problem, when there is no problem, think about the problem, if you are not in a hurry, if you are not in a hurry, you are in a hurry, and you are troubled.

1.The problem is me. I don't want to say anything.

2.The question is. Not a problem at all.

3.Issue. It's been solved.

The problem is the unknown, the unknown person, the unknown thing, the unknown situation that we want to know, and what we want to talk about is the known situation of people and things, and the situation of people and things that we do not understand.

The problem is, the nine words you typed above, and the two punctuation marks.

As for what you're trying to say, I don't know. After all, I don't have the ability to read minds, let alone mind readers who can't see people through the screen.

It hurt her heart again as she left. Since I love, but I hate, this kind of contradictory mood really shouldn't be said.

A mature person will definitely be hurt beyond recognition by the past, but at least he is more mature, and now he can say that he is unrecognizable without judgment, so there is a taste of contempt, as if to say, the other party's heart is not pure enough.

Everybody will be hurt, that's right, but why bother stressing that now I've hurt you again, or you've hurt me again, and I'm responsible? No matter what you define your relationship with her, it's your own right, and she also has a self-defense definition, so you can't use your definition to measure her definition, and it's unfair to think that if you are good to her, she should be good to you. If someone else likes you, if you refuse, will you let the other party scold you for being ruthless?

Maybe it's because she's so poisonous with the word that you become irrational. But if that's the case, why bother giving her this text message? Just leave, whatever the past is, let it end like this.