Who knows what Copernican turn means?

And "Copernican revolution" is the same meaning.

1.Kant boasted that he had made a "Copernican revolution" in philosophy, that is, his philosophical achievements were equivalent to Copernicus's astronomical research.

2.Copernicus put forward the heliocentric theory, which was the dominant force in the past, so his heliocentric theory was a revolution in astronomy, turning "the earth as the center, and the sun revolves around the earth" to "the sun is the center, and the earth revolves around the sun", which is a 180° turn, so it is a "turn", a revolution.

3.Kant's philosophy is very difficult, to put it simply, "man legislates for nature", man has "a priori self-consciousness", and makes "innate comprehensive judgment".

In the past, people generally believed that the relationship between man and nature was nothing more than the understanding of nature through human experience.

Kant believed that human beings construct the natural world into a world that operates according to definite laws in a priori categories, and then obtain systematic scientific knowledge in it, that is, "the form and category of time and space from the mind determine the empirical knowledge of the external world".

4.This paragraph may be vague, that is, man decides nature - as many colors as my eyes can see, there are as many colors in nature, if everyone is blind, then there is no such thing as color (and the previous people always thought that nature had existed for a long time, and people just slowly learned about nature).

So it's also a 180° turn, similar to Copernicus's "revolution", I don't know if you explain it like this?

5.In fact, this view is very clear in Vico's "man-made legislation for nature".

I just read one that says:

We are now accustomed to thinking that Song Ming Theory = Chinese philosophy in the Song and Ming dynasties, but we have forgotten that Song Ming Theory was also developed from Confucianism and cannot be separated from the basic context of Confucianism.

Therefore, my understanding is that the Copernican turn means that there are facts that we have been ignoring and taking for granted that what we see in the past is right from our perspective (for example, there was no concept of philosophy in China before, it only existed in modern times, but we think that Song and Ming theory is just a set of philosophical theories, and has lost the fundamental goal of Confucian governance), but now we have to turn around, face the facts, and tell the truth as we see it.

In the Middle Ages, people believed in the geocentric theory, and the geocentric theory pointed to theological teleology, that is, God created human beings with a noble purpose, and that human beings were above everything else, at the center of the universe.

This statement is indeed not in line with the facts, and it is just people's wishful thinking. Copernicus's turn broke this habit and allowed people to see what the truth was.

In daily life, it may be used in some places with obvious biases, but who sees the whole picture?

The Copernican turn, also known as the Copernican Revolution, the Copernican change, also called the turn, all have similar meanings. Before Copernicus, it was generally believed that the sun revolves around the earth, that is, the geocentric theory, and later Copernicus proposed that the earth revolves around the sun, the heliocentric theory, which is the Copernican revolution.

In short, the Copernican revolution is a metaphor for a theory"Revolution"And that kind of radical, disruptive change. Like Kant's"Copernicus change"That is, originally, it was generally believed that it was"Object"Determines the knowledge of man, which Kant later proposed, is ours"Knowledge""Capabilities"It's decided"Object"It's like"Copernican Revolution"All the same, upside down.

God's book"toward"Humanistic"It can also be used"Copernican Revolution"to analogy.

Today, Blanton's inferentialist view of our discursive practice is often hailed as a Copernican twist in contemporary philosophy of language.

That is, the inferential view of practice.

It is the rule of pathology, the cause, mechanism and development law of human diseases, as well as the morphological structure, functional metabolic changes and lesion prognosis of the body in the process of disease.

The upstairs answer is debatable. Kant is not saying that his doctrine is central to all doctrines, but that his doctrine is radically transformative. The "Copernican revolution" means radical change.

In the past, the geocentric theory, which was absolutely dominant in Europe, believed that the earth was the center of the universe, and the sun and other celestial bodies orbited around the earth. However, Copernicus put forward the heliocentric theory, which completely subverted the traditional geocentric thought, and its transformative significance and impact were huge.

So what exactly did Kant change? To put it simply, it is like this. Traditional philosophy believes that the relationship between human knowledge and objects is that human knowledge conforms to the object, but Kant did the opposite, believing that the object is in line with our knowledge and in line with the subject's transcendental cognitive ability, which is a great change, and Kant has thus become the grandmaster of transcendental philosophy.

Of course, the object here should be understood as a phenomenon, and Kant believed that this is the case in the phenomenal world, and the ontology corresponding to the phenomenon is called the object itself, which he believes is not something that can be grasped by man's cognitive ability.

Centered on a certain person, everything is done for him or her willingly.

A person who gives a lot and revolves around the people he loves.

There is a difference between cognition and cognition in three aspects: definition, subjective objectivity, and scope of use.

1. The definitions are different.

Cognition is the thinking activity of the human brain to reflect the characteristics and connections of objective things, and to reveal the meaning and effect of things on people.

Cognition refers to the process of people acquiring knowledge or applying knowledge, or the process of information processing, which is the most basic psychological process of people.

2. Subjectivity and objectivity are different.

Human cognitive ability is closely related to human cognitive process, and it can be said that cognition is a product of human cognitive process.

Generally speaking, people's perception (feeling, perception) and thinking (imagination, association, thinking) of objective things are cognitive activities. The process of cognition is the process of subjective objectification, that is, the subjective reflects the objective and makes the objective manifest in the subjective.

Cognitive objectivity is relatively strong, and cognitive subjectivity is relatively strong.

3. The scope of use is different.

If a person can judge a person's good or bad through simple communication, I think it must be extraordinary.

Most people's cognition is one-sided, and the limitation of this cognition is caused by modern people's concept of time, unilateral cognition is like: from a stranger communication can immediately judge the person's good or bad, and the feeling plays an important part. Feeling is the premise of cognition, I don't know what that person is like, I judge by feeling first.

Unilateral cognition = sensory cognition.

I think most people have this kind of cognition, you will hear some bad Chinese from her other people's mouth, and thus you will also plant in your heart "that person is not very good" and have a disgusting impression, there are also similar to the boss of the company you apply for from the business is a little obscene, you will judge from the "feeling cognition" that the boss is not a good boss, there are similar situations, in the blind date process, the most occupied is "feeling and knowing" from the simple communication, we will behave from the other party's behavior, The way of talking, and even looking forward to whether the other party is their own like-minded other half, first of all, I feel that judging "whether the other party is calling" I think having a car and a house is secondary.

Multifaceted cognition = thinking.

In a situation like this, you have a friend who accidentally kills someone and sets a fire one day, and you, as a friend, think about why he is not a bad person, what prompted him to do it, and most people can unilaterally think that he is a bad person without knowing your friend.

So a lot of times, when we are confronted with something unfamiliar, or some people, the first answer is feelings. It would be easier for us to make a judgment if we had someone next to you (especially a good friend) doing some counseling for you.

Because we seldom think about it. It is time that has formed such a habit for us, and even produces the mood of annoyance when thinking.

Cognition is the active behavior of the subject to collect the knowledge of the object, and it is the manifestation of epistemic consciousness. That is, how people obtain information from the outside world, whether they pay attention to details or the whole. That is, the subjective reflects the objective.

Cognition refers to the process by which people acquire knowledge or apply knowledge, or the process of information processing. So it includes behavioral reactions to the outside world. More action than awareness.

The self-development of cognitive cognition, thinking, or perception, including the cognitive faculties or processes of understanding and reasoning, by which knowledge of a feeling or idea is acquired.

Identify something. Get to know someone.

Know; Identify.

Feel that people are able to recognize objective truths, and the mind is a reflection of the objective world.

Cognition is something superficial, and cognition is something internal.

Cognition is only rational approval, cognition is rational and emotional approval, which needs to go through what you said about moral cognition and moral cognition, for example: you know that littering is wrong, but you still throw it, this is cognition; When you throw something one day and hit someone, and then you realize that it's not right, and you stop littering in the future, that's recognition.

Cognition is just probably familiar, cognition is very understanding, understanding.

A person who holds the truth of science and has an unyielding and resolute character.

He is full of the noble spiritual qualities of having the courage to explore the truth and dedicating himself to science.