-
Su Xun's "Treatise on the Six Kingdoms" has a simple and natural style and is not informal, which has made great development of prose and has a far-reaching impact on later generations.
But on the other hand, Su Xun's "Theory of the Six Kingdoms" attributed the reason for the demise of the Six Kingdoms to "bribing Qin", although the article gives people a sense of overwhelming strength in argumentation and tone, but today it seems to be obviously biased. Because in essence, the demise of the Six Nations was due to the fact that they did not think about reform and forge ahead, and did not adopt the policy of enriching the country and strengthening the army, so they fell into a situation of backwardness and being beaten and were eliminated by history. Of course, there are also various specific reasons for the destruction of strategies and tactics (including "bribing Qin").
Seeing certain facts from a certain perspective and thinking that Lahan has grasped the whole of things, this is a mistake that human beings can easily fall into. (Excerpted from "Argument of Facts: Eloquence and Transgression", No. 5, 2006)
Writing features: 1.Borrowing from the past to satirize the present, to the point of the times.
2.The arguments are clear and the arguments are rigorous.
3.The language is vivid, and the momentum is abundant.
Su Zhe and Su Shi's did not make a breakthrough in the former's concept, so generally speaking, Su Xun's is the first to be recommended in the Six Kingdoms Theory.
-
The original text of the Six Kingdoms Treatise is as follows:
Song Ersu's theory on the six countries to cut land and bribe Qin, weaken themselves, take razor and annihilate, and do not know how to stick to the agreement; Qi, Chu, Yan, Zhao didn't know Zuo Han, Wei Yi Qin: I thought it would be like this, and then Qin's troubles could be relieved. Spring.
The reason why the future generations of the husband hated Qin was not because of his violent evil? From the rest of the view, the people of the other six countries all want to be done by Qin, and they can't focus on Qin. At that time, the six kingdoms of the Eastern Princes also did not quarrel with the bridge to be better than the Qin Shengju; He is drowning in attacking, accustomed to deceit, and those who eat strong and weak meat regard Qin as no different.
The soldiers are in trouble, and there is no vain age.
To make those who are good at the benefits of convenience like Qin, and get the help of God. It may not be that there will be another Qin. However, in the end, he did not refrain from what Qin Zhi did, but was to weaken himself and destroy him. When Su Qin came out, he wanted to use Qin, and taught it to swallow the world. Honestly know that it is easy.
The translation is as follows: Su Xun and Su Zhe of the Song Dynasty believed that the Six Kingdoms would only cede land and bribe the Qin State, and that they would weaken themselves and lead to their destruction. I don't know the importance of sticking to the covenant; The states of Qi, Chu, Yan, and Zhao did not know how to help Korea and Wei to resist the Qin state: after thinking that it had to be like this, the threat of the Qin state could be eliminated.
Isn't the reason why later generations hate the Qin State because of the cruelty of the Qin rulers? In my opinion, the fact that the six countries all wanted to do what Qin did was not necessarily just because Qin was guilty.
At this time, among the six kingdoms of the Shandong princes, none of them could surpass the Qin state, they were addicted to armed attacks, and they were accustomed to deceiving and deceiving themselves, and the weak were no different from the Qin state. The wars continued, and the scourge of war continued year after year. If the previous geographical situation was as favorable as that of Qin, and with the help of the heavens, then one of the six countries could also unify China like Qin.
It's just that they were not able to do what the Qin State did in the end, so they weakened themselves and led to their demise.