Why Heidegger s philosophy supports Nasui

Philosophical thoughts. Heidegger is one of the founders and main exponents of existentialist philosophy. In his book Being and Time, he quoted this passage from Plato:

When you use the word 'exists,' it's clear that you're familiar with what it means, but we used to believe and understand it, but we're at a loss now." Then he said that Plato pointed out that the meaning of "being" that everyone was familiar with was not really understood by anyone. This question has not been solved until today, 2000 years later, and he is here to re-raise and solve the question of the meaning of "being".

Heidegger elaborated on the meaning of "being" as follows:

already has the nature. That is to say, there must be "in" first, and then there must be "in"; It is never possible to be "there" at all, there is a "being".

To solve the problem of "being", it is necessary to trace back to a kind of "being", and the "being" of this "being" is already clear when it is not clear what it really becomes.

Heidegger argues that only the "I" is this "being", and that only the "I" is in a time when it is not clear what it is. Therefore, he believes that "I" is "being" and "being" is "me". Going on, Heidegger talks about the "being" of "I" as the world.

Here, the core of Heidegger's thought is that the individual is the existence of the world. Of all mammals, only humans have the ability to be aware of their existence.

They do not exist as a self in relation to the external world, nor as an ontology that interacts with other things in the world. Human beings exist through the existence of the world, and the world exists because of the existence of human beings. Heidegger also argues that human beings are in a state of contradictions, and they foreshadow the inevitable death that leads to the experience of suffering and horror.

They had to admit that death was inevitable, and then everything ceased to exist. Our existence is neither of our own nor our choice. Existence is imposed on us and will continue until we die.

Heidegger's philosophy has had a strong influence on modern existentialist psychology, especially on LBinsvanger's psychology has been particularly influential. He took Heidegger's concept of the existence of the world as a basic principle of existential psychology.

His existential ideas also had a great enlightening effect on the development of psychology in the future.

It is the field of view of "the thing itself".

We need to know that "being" can be traced back to ancient Greece, where Heidegger's "understanding of being itself determines the existence of being".

The history of existence in Western philosophy is that "seeing the essence through phenomena" avoids the positive answer to existence, and uses it as the most unmistakable concept. If someone asks what existence is, people will definitely find it strange, existence is existence, and there is nothing to doubt about it. Existence is the most universal essence of commonality, a general metaphysical concept, which is not the same as saying

It is the clearest concept and needs no further discussion. The concept of existence is undoubtedly the most obscure of all. Therefore, Heidegger argues that Being is far from being an unmistakable concept as it is understood, and that there are many questions about Being that have not yet been clarified.

Heidegger argues that one of the most important reasons for misunderstanding being is that philosophers equate being with being, while Heidegger argues that being and being are not the same thing at all.

It is only on the basis of Husserl's phenomenology that the "ready-made" and "conceptual" ways of being are denied, and the "constitutive" or "being reciprocally triggers itself to obtain itself" is revealed. As a result, a new understanding of the "horizon of 'existence' itself" has emerged.

That is to say, in the past, we always had a layer of obstacle for "being" to "see the essence through phenomena", and we had to see it "through", but Heidegger's "being" itself is the essence.

This concept comes from Heidegger's existentialism, who argues that the precondition for man to be able to know the world is:'Be present'with'Non-occlusion', which I understand as being in the world first and then in contact with the world; However, Hai also believes that as long as he has been present, even if he is not physically present, he has always been present.

Heidegger's collaboration with the Nazis, while inextricably linked to his racist complex, was also intrinsically linked to his philosophical ideas. Because one of the most central elements of his philosophical thought is the claim that existence and time are inseparable, and existence itself contains a dimension of time that cannot be eliminated. As a "philosophy of existence", it means that the drama of man does not just appear in history, it is history itself.

"Historicity" is a term coined by Heidegger to describe the inherent historical characteristics of human beings in the world. However, if this is the case, this relationship between the pure philosophy of survival and the practice of life becomes distant from each other, or becomes an insignificant "theoretical philosophy". But this conclusion is very suitable for Heidegger's philosophical thought, because in his philosophy, overcoming the traditional philosophical division between "theoretical" reason and "practical" reason has been transformed into a planned theoretical goal.

Heidegger constantly reminds us that when we look at the world carefully, the "being" is already philosophical, and the "thinking" itself is already practical.

Almost complete nonsense! "Thinking" is practice, and this kind of nonsense can only be said by Western "thinkers". If "thinking" is practice, then what is practice? What is the conscious action of man?

One day at the age of 18, Heidegger borrowed a book from a village priest entitled "On the Multiple Meanings of Being in Aristotle" and immediately became obsessed with it. The result is one of the most exciting ideas of the 20th century. The question that fascinated the young Heidegger so much was "what is being".

This deceptively simple question has puzzled many philosophers, but Heidegger hopes that he can give it an answer.