Someone who understands the law! Speed comes in.。。 I ask for help!!

Updated on society 2024-02-25
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The no-fault liability principle applies to this incident, which means that you are liable regardless of whether you are at fault or not.

    The principle of no-fault liability has the following exemptions or mitigation of liability.

    1. If the victim is intentional, the perpetrator is exempt from liability.

    2. Where the victim is grossly negligent, the perpetrator shall have his responsibility reduced.

    3. If the victim is generally negligent, the perpetrator shall bear full responsibility.

    Now it depends on the degree of fault of the victim at that time, of course, this cannot be taken for granted, and it must be specially determined.

    Evidence proves to be key.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    If the other party has subjective intentions and you are not at fault (speeding, etc.). It can be absolved (or at least mitigated) of your responsibility, since he is seeking death, then he should be considered subjective and intentional, good luck.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Whether the facts you said can be recognized by the traffic police and a traffic accident liability determination can be issued as you said. If it is determined that the other party is fully responsible. According to the regulations, you as the car owner are only responsible for 10%.

    Therefore, how to deal with it must wait until the liability determination is issued

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    What does the traffic police force say about the accident liability certificate?

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    According to the latest regulations, even if you are not at fault, you are 10% liable.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It's okay. The newly promulgated Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China has clear provisions, as well as provisions in the Road Traffic Safety Law. He must be fully responsible. If the truth is what you say.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Mine you may not be satisfied, but mine is definitely in accordance with the law.

    First of all, there is nothing wrong with the security guard, you must know that the duty of the security guard is to protect the safety of the entire community, and it is his duty not to open the door to your husband. Secondly, your husband is damaging public property by jumping into the duty room and kicking the table over, and there is nothing wrong with the police station making such a decision. The only thing I can do now is to calm down and find your husband some change of clothes for him.

    Don't try to find someone to dredge up the relationship and get your husband out, there's no point. In addition, even if you find someone, you have to be locked up for at least a day or two, and there is a lot of money to spend, and it is not of much significance. Now I can only take the initiative to admit my mistakes, hoping to come out early.

    5 days is neither long nor short, and it may be a good thing for your husband. In today's society, if such a fiery temper is not changed, something big will happen in the future.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    First of all, it is impossible to convict of damaging public property! Because the crime of destroying public property is a criminal offense! This is to be prosecuted by the procuratorate and the court can only be convicted!

    The public security organs should be in accordance with the relevant provisions of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law"! But just knocking over the table shouldn't be as damaging your belongings!

    Because the public security organs have already given administrative punishments, if you want to protect your legitimate rights and interests, you can go to the court to file an administrative lawsuit!

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    If your husband is not familiar with the security guard, there is nothing wrong with the security guard's approach, which is also responsible for his profession. If your husband is familiar with the security guard, this is still a bit infuriating. So far, the only way to do this is to accept the punishment and learn a lesson in the future.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The crime of destroying property is impossible, because it is a criminal offense, and your situation is obviously not up to it, at most it is suspected of violating the Public Security Administration Punishment Regulations.

    Although the public security has imposed an administrative penalty, if they are not satisfied, they can apply for reconsideration or file an administrative lawsuit.

    However, even if such a lawsuit is won, it is just an export of gas, and the state compensation is almost negligible, depending on your own choice.

Related questions
11 answers2024-02-25

The back of each courier company's express bill has stated the exemption clause, you can find that you can find that it is basically stipulated that under the premise of not insuring the price, in case of loss and damage, the courier company's compensation liability is 2 or 3 times the freight, and the maximum compensation is 5 times, depending on which courier company. That's right, this is an overlord clause, but if you need the services of the courier company, you have to accept such a clause, and under the premise of no insurance price, the courier company will pay the original price, which is already good.

8 answers2024-02-25

Article 31 of the Measures for the Handling of Road Traffic Accidents has been repealed, which stipulates that the vehicle owner shall be responsible for the advance payment of traffic accidents, but with the implementation of the new Traffic Safety Law, the responsibility of the vehicle owner to be responsible for the advance payment has been abolished. There is no legal basis for the liability of car owners in road traffic accident personal injury compensation cases accepted after May 1, 2004. >>>More

1 answers2024-02-25

In this case, you will definitely have to file for divorce, and in order to strive for greater interests, it is recommended to find a lawyer to intervene as soon as possible and have sufficient evidence. Here are some specific legal requirements: >>>More

3 answers2024-02-25

1. Generally, the public security organs are responsible for collecting evidence, and the victim or ** person, as well as the defender of the criminal suspect, also have the right to collect evidence. >>>More

7 answers2024-02-25

"Don't trust property sales lightly! ”This is the most sincere advice given by a veteran real estate marketer. >>>More