Whoever knows the law come 20, please come who knows the law

The back of each courier company's express bill has stated the exemption clause, you can find that you can find that it is basically stipulated that under the premise of not insuring the price, in case of loss and damage, the courier company's compensation liability is 2 or 3 times the freight, and the maximum compensation is 5 times, depending on which courier company. That's right, this is an overlord clause, but if you need the services of the courier company, you have to accept such a clause, and under the premise of no insurance price, the courier company will pay the original price, which is already good.

1. This dispute is a dispute over a housing sales contract, according to what you said, you have fulfilled your obligations in accordance with the contract, and the other party has been in a state of breach of contract, so now you can claim your rights through litigation;

2. You have the right to request continued performance or termination of this contract; If you choose to continue to perform, you can also require the other party to bear the liability for breach of contract.

3. If you choose to cancel, you should return the purchase price of the other party and claim to pay liquidated damages, but the liquidated damages shall not exceed 20% of the total contract price, that is, 40,000 yuan;

4. If the lawsuit is filed, the probability of winning the case is greater, but in view of the long time of the lawsuit and the easy to produce contradictions, it is recommended to negotiate and deal with it, and if the negotiation fails, file a lawsuit in time to protect the rights and interests.

You can be compensated for your odds of winning.

Because it was he who first defaulted and then did not pay.

So your odds are good.

You can get a court summons.

The trial of a sales contract or a civil dispute case in general terms mainly depends on the evidence, and it is useless to say anything without evidence, and the evidence should be inclined and targeted to explain the problem. When it comes to winning the case, it depends on the content of the evidence you submit, and whether the other party has a direct intention not to continue to perform the contract.

It depends on what the purpose of your lawsuit is, whether to continue to complete the transaction or terminate the contract, if you continue to complete the transaction, it is no problem to win the lawsuit, but if the other party does not give money, there will be trouble in enforcement, and if you want to terminate the contract, it is unlikely to win the lawsuit. You didn't say how much you owe, but the conventional understanding is that the final payment should be considered a small amount, and the main expenses should have been paid, in this case, the other party has fulfilled the main debt, and the statutory discharge is not applicable, and if you want to remove, you can only negotiate and settle it.

Supplement: According to the information you added, if you sue, you can directly sue for the termination of the contract, that is, the second set of plans. The court will give priority to mediation, and you can propose your first plan at the time of mediation.

If the mediation fails, the other party can claim to the court that the other party has delayed the performance of the obligations stipulated in the contract, resulting in the failure of the contract to achieve the original purpose, and the other party has the intention to terminate the contract. Therefore, the contract can be terminated and the liquidated damages and related taxes can be deducted from the refund (the fault lies with the other party, and of course the other party bears the relevant costs).

Your odds are pretty good.

You can claim continued performance of the contract and at the same time claim liquidated damages.

1. Select C. According to Article 33 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China, "where the facts of the violation are conclusive, and an administrative penalty of a fine of less than 50 yuan is imposed on a citizen, or a fine of less than 1,000 yuan or a warning is imposed on a legal person or other organization, an administrative punishment decision may be made on the spot." At the same time, in accordance with Article 47, "In accordance with the provisions of Article 33 of this Law, an administrative punishment decision is made on the spot, and in any of the following circumstances, law enforcement personnel may collect fines on the spot:

1) A fine of up to 20 yuan is given in accordance with law; (2) It is difficult to enforce after the fact that it is not collected on the spot. "The situation in item C is in accordance with the regulations, so C is chosen. 2. Select Select A, select A, select A, select A.

According to Article 19 of the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China, "the people's court where the immovable property is located shall have jurisdiction over administrative litigation arising from immovable property." Commercial buildings are immovable property and are located in Chaoyang District, so they should be accepted by the Chaoyang District Court.

If it is not revoked, there is no statute of limitations, and it is recommended to surrender immediately.

constitutes a crime. But don't be afraid, it won't be heavy.

You are an accomplice to an insurance fraud and did not directly plan it, but you join the criminal act when the criminal act has not been completed, and you are a joint criminal.

1.In this crime, Ni did not share the spoils, so it is a type of mitigating circumstance.

Whether or not there is subjective knowledge of a crime does not matter if it constitutes a crime. So, it doesn't matter.

Don't be too scared. In court, you should actively admit your guilt, be honest, especially in your final statement, and show that you have recognized your mistakes and caused harm to society, and then actively reformed .........Wait a minute.

It's better to hire a lawyer, because there are many details that I can't easily go through. It doesn't matter if you master a few more light plots.

Attorney fees are not expensive, depending on your area, of course. If you don't have the money, you can apply for legal aid, but of course you have to meet the conditions. You should consult a local lawyer. As soon as possible.

Yes, you should be punished by the law, because you are already an accomplice, if you know that you are committing a crime.

There is nothing wrong with your statement, because you knew it was a fraud at first, but you still participated, but the crime is not too great, and if you don't say it, at least your confession is not good enough. I don't think the verdict in an economic case will be too heavy if it doesn't cause any damage to society, and it mainly depends on the attitude of the plaintiff.