-
On the other hand, we can think that if the north is not unified by Cao Cao, then can the princes of Yuan Shao, Yuan Shu, and Ma Teng all be called kings and emperors? That's why Cao Cao said: If not, there are not only a few people who are called emperors, but also a few people who are kings.
-
Inside the Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
Cao Cao is a BB
But he's really a hero!
-
This is actually true, the Yellow Turban Yu Dang did not say it, the fourth and third princes of the Yuan Shujia were deeply favored by the Han family, and they did not secretly hide the national seal, and they wanted to be the emperor if they were not careful. And Cao Cao himself may not be pure-hearted, according to Chen Lin, this prince belongs to the "eunuch erection of the ugly" - the eunuch did not cut off the birth, even Mr. Chen in the "Three Kingdoms" also called him: "can not judge the birth of the end", although the door is much worse than the Yuan family, but the reason why he did not force the Han Xian Emperor "Zen let" is just because the time is not ripe, afraid that Sun Quan and his ilk will put him on the stove to roast, so he had to be the king of Zhou Wen, and the emperor left it to his son to do a good job.
-
Of course there is a basis! Think about it, if there was no Cao Cao, then I'm afraid no one would be able to suppress the Yellow Turban Rebellion! There is also Huainan Yuan Shu, the soldiers are good and the food is sufficient; Yuan Shao of Hebei, the fourth and third dukes; What else is Sun Jian, Liu Bei, all the messy people have to be called emperors!
There's a Cao Cao there!
-
The fourth floor is basically correct. I didn't have much to say after reading it.
-
Meaning: If the country does not have me, I don't know how many people will be emperors and how many people will be hegemons.
Lonely: The name of the ancient princes who were humble. Cao Cao was the prime minister at that time, and he was named the Marquis of Wuping, so he called himself.
From the "Shuzhi Order" by Cao Cao of the Two Han Dynasty.
Meaning: Some people may see that my power is strong, and I don't believe in the destiny of heaven, I am afraid that they will talk in private, saying that I have the ambition to seize the throne, and this kind of random speculation often makes my heart uneasy.
-
This sentence is from Cao Cao's "Let the County Sing Ben Zhi Ling" (also known as the "Shu Zhi Order"), which was written by Cao Cao in 210 AD. At that time, Cao Cao Chibi was defeated and returned, and the scholars and scholars all used this to ridicule Cao Cao's invincibility and arrogance, and Cao Cao wrote this article in order to block the crowd. In the article, Cao Cao talked about how he grew from an ordinary official eunuch to a prime minister under one person and above ten thousand.
During this period, Cao Cao's prose was simple and realistic, telling about his changes and development step by step. There is such a sentence in the article: "Let there be no loneliness in the world, I don't know how many people are called emperors and how many people are kings." It means that "if there is no me in this world, then I don't know how many people will call themselves 'emperors'" The meaning expressed is "If it were not for me Cao Cao, this Han dynasty would have fallen apart long ago, and you (the scholar class) are still sneering at me here."
Throughout the historical facts of the late Eastern Han Dynasty, this is indeed the case. Therefore, the text achieved the desired effect, and many of Cao Cao's practices were also recognized by the scholar class, even including many royalists.
-
It's just that Cao Cao's very domineering words are also words to defend himself - (you still say that I am authoritarian and domineering) If there is no me in the world, I don't know how many people call the king and the emperor.
-
The meaning is explained upstairs, and there is another meaning: Since there is me in this world, then there will be no other kings, other emperors.
-
If there is no me in the world, I don't know how many people in the world will become kings and emperors.
-
There are only two factors that prevent Cao Cao from becoming emperor. The first factor is that in the southwest direction, because Liu Bei is under the banner of reviving the Han Dynasty, it has caused a lot of impact on the surrounding area. In addition, Liu Bei's power is getting bigger and stronger.
By the first three years of Cao Cao's death, he had initially had the strength to wrestle with Cao Cao, and in the last two years of Cao Cao, Guan Yu's Northern Expedition once made Cao Cao want to move the capital. It can be said that when Cao Cao had the conditions to be the emperor, Liu Bei at the same time was also in the spring breeze. If he is called the emperor, then he will become the second Wang Mang.
At that time, Liu Bei is very likely to become the second Liu Xiu. This obstacle made Cao Cao dare not claim the title of emperor. Moreover, Geng Ji, Hou Yin and others rebelled in Cao Cao's hinterland, which made Cao Cao even more afraid to claim the emperor.
At this time, the will of heaven and the people's hearts were not in Cao Cao. After all, the lessons learned from the past are too great. At this time, Cao Cao focused his energy on stabilizing and strengthening the position of the imperial court and uniting with Sun Quan to deal with Liu Bei.
The second factor, which is minor or even the main factor, is not the main factor, but it should not be ignored. That is the issue of his age, when the time entered 212 years, Cao Cao's age was almost 60 years old. This age is nothing now, but in ancient times, the average life expectancy of people was significantly lower than it is now.
In his 50s, he is already equivalent to half a foot and began to step into the loess. It really doesn't mean much to be called emperor at this age, and I can't enjoy the emperor for a few years. And although Cao Cao was not the emperor at this time, he was actually no different from the emperor except for the formal difference.
And in combination with the first factor, if you directly claim the emperor, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. There's no need for that.
-
Cao Cao's willingness not to be the emperor was mainly because he had already mastered the power of the Eastern Han Dynasty at that time, and he wanted his son to be the emperor, and later his son Cao Pi abolished the Han Xian Emperor and called himself the emperor.
-
does not conform to the situation at that time, if you become the emperor, it will be difficult to win the hearts of the people, and it will make others bigger.
-
This shows that Cao Cao has great wisdom.
-
In general, it will not be called an emperor, and Yuan Shu is a good example. If Cao Cao was proclaimed emperor at that time, it just gave Liu Bei and Sun Quan a legitimate reason to attack him, according to all the innate conditions, he was not allowed to be proclaimed emperor at that time.
-
If I were Cao Cao, I would definitely be the emperor. It is the dream of all men in the world to become an emperor with their own ability, and only by becoming an emperor can they better display their ambitions and benefit the world!
-
No, because the Han Dynasty had a foundation of 400 years, it was difficult to convince the public to rashly claim the emperor, and the historical conditions at that time did not allow it.
-
If I were Cao Cao, I would not be the emperor, and I would wait until the time was ripe to become the emperor.
-
If I were Cao Cao during the Three Kingdoms period, of course I would not be the emperor. Although he did not become an emperor, in fact, power is the same as that of an emperor, which is also a very good feeling.
-
No, first, it is better not to call the emperor's posthumous name, second, the conditions at that time were not sufficient, and third, the career is the second priority.
-
No, there is already the real power of the emperor, and calling the emperor is just a name, and being called the emperor is likely to cause trouble.
-
No. Because if the abolition of the Han is self-reliant, it will inevitably attract the dissatisfaction and crusade of warlords in other places, and it will also end up with a rebellious infamy, which will not outweigh the losses, but will not be beautiful.
Such a person is not worthy of you to do that to him. It shows that when the two of you are together, he doesn't have deep feelings for you. If you don't see him, he wants to see you. People who deserve your grief will not make you sad. The person who makes you sad is not worth it for you to be sad for him!
The most beautiful state of a coin is not that it is still, but when it turns like a spinning top, no one knows whether the side that is about to turn out is happy or painful, whether it is love or hate. Happiness and pain, love and hate, are always entangled. The so-called fate, like invention, is due to chance. >>>More
There is no one right or wrong in this matter, and individuals have their own personal opinions. Maybe you're right with him. I think it's really wrong, it's just your feelings, maybe you care too much. >>>More
In fact, men need their own space more than women, they have a strong sense of self-esteem, some men don't want their beloved women to worry about themselves, they want to carry their own, which is understandable. In fact, their psychological pressure is sometimes greater than that of us women, of course, in the eyes of two people who love each other, they should be honest and shared, but this is just a woman's opinion, a man may be drunk and will lean on your back to you to confide in his inner sorrow, but in ordinary times he will smile at you, say to you It's okay, okay, don't think too much, etc., I think if you love your boyfriend, you should care about him from the details and don't interrogate him, oh, ask too much, he may be annoyed, Maybe one day at some point, he will find that there is a you who has been silently supporting him by his side.
Is this love? Just because you get it, you don't cherish it anymore, this is desire. >>>More