Is the Mead Astronomical Telescope Ds20090 cost effective?

It's not high, if it weren't for his automatic star search, it would be equivalent to a telescope of 500 yuan. Automatic star hunting isn't very useful, unless you're the kind of enthusiast who uses tens of thousands of dollars of equipment to shoot galaxies and nebulae all night. Every time you go downstairs for astronomical observation, holding a telescope for automatic star searching, you need to spend dozens of minutes to enter the time, enter the coordinates, align the north, horizontal placement, N star calibration and other complicated steps, in order to automatically find the star, and this low-end automatic star search theodolite accuracy is often very low, sometimes the automatic star search is not accurate.

The aperture of this telescope is too small, and there are very few deep-sky targets that can be seen in the city, while the targets that can be seen by this small telescope can be found with the naked eye, and there is no need to automatically search for stars.

Regular products, it should be possible.

But for novices, I am afraid that there is a more important question than how to choose: that is, whether the astronomical telescope is really suitable for you to buy, because the actual use of the astronomical telescope is actually very different from what you imagined. Many people buy it back, but they are idle because it is too different from what they imagined.

Forget it, I'll copy it for you".

About astronomical telescopes, maybe there are too many misleading things in the movie, maybe there are too many irresponsible advertisements, and many people who have not been in contact with it have a misunderstanding that they think they can see colorful nebulae - in fact, it is the effect that can only be obtained by using a professional SLR camera, and a sophisticated electric and equatorial mount to track ** for a long time. Even if it is an astronomical telescope of tens of thousands of yuan, observers cannot see such colorful spots as those **.

It's not worth it, although the optical quality of the telescope itself is very average, even if it is found, it can't be seen, and the automatic star search is not so easy to use, and it needs to be calibrated with a few stars every time it is used, and it is generally not needed by deep space photography enthusiasts. At the same price, you can hold the pants to buy Xinda 150750 and EQ3D. The caliber is 150mm and 90mm, and everyone knows which one is better.

One of the brackets is an EQ3D equatorial mount and the other is a theodolite, which also has a lot of advantages in stability. And there is a lot of room for upgrading, many people use six or seven thousand equatorial mounts, and the primary mirror is still Xinda 150750

There are only a few brightest targets that can be seen in the city, since they are so bright, you can find them by looking at the star map software on your phone, and then you can point the telescope to the past, and you don't need to find the stars automatically.

Do you have more details? Astronomy is not too fun overall, if you are a novice.

It is recommended to choose DS20090DI, both of which are not large in caliber, and they are not good for shooting deep space, but DS20090DI has a long focal length and a larger magnification, and the effect of looking at the stars and the moon is obviously better than that of ETX80ATBB

ETX is fragile and very easy to break** cheap just can't look far away.

Xingtron's is better, his operation is relatively simple, and it is relatively easy to use.

The former, caliber, multiple large light intensity.

Obviously, the primary mirror at 127 Mead is a toy.

It's not worth it, that telescope can automatically find stars, but the lens barrel is so bad that it can be said that this telescope is worth three or four hundred yuan if it is automatically searched for stars.