Which is more powerful, Huawei Kirin 980 or Apple A13 chip?

Although Apple's iPhone 11 does not have many selling points, the A13 processor is really strong. For smartphones, there is currently no chip that can compete with the Apple A13. Wait, Huawei's Kirin 990 chip can't be compared with Apple A13?

Apple rarely opened the chip performance comparison at the press conference, and Huawei Qualcomm was put in the PPT. Of course, at Apple's press conference, Qualcomm and Huawei's chips were all crushed by A13.

Does this mean that the performance of Apple's A13 chip is stronger than Huawei's Kirin, and the Kirin 990 is still glorious despite defeat, no! Because Huawei's Kirin 990 chip was not compared by Apple, but last year's Kirin 980 was compared.

At this year's autumn conference, in addition to introducing the camera, screen and color, Apple also advertised the performance of its own A13 processor this time. The point is that this time Apple actually followed the common way in the industry to list specific performance score data. This point has always been complained about.

You must know that the previous Apple conference was very high, and it would not be compared with other mobile phone manufacturers in terms of processor. But this year's iPhone11 series actually covers Qualcomm's Snapdragon, as well as Huawei's Kirin 980 and other competitors in the same class, of course, the result is naturally Apple's A13, A12 victory.

However, Huawei's Kirin 990 chip has not been put together by Apple.

Apple's A-series chips have always been known for their strong performance in the industry, and can Huawei's flagship chip Kirin 990 surpass Apple's A13? It's hard to say this, but at present, the domestic running score software has announced the detailed running score results of the iPhone11 equipped with Apple A13 chip and the Kirin 990 5G version. Although the two cannot be directly compared, Apple chips are indeed stronger.

Both Apple and Huawei use TSMC's 7nm process, which has the advantage of further providing a better power consumption ratio. Apple's chips don't talk about it, the performance is not bad, but it's a pity that there is no 5G support. But Huawei's Kirin 990 chip is integrated with 5G baseband, and at this point, Huawei Kirin 990 is crushing Apple's A13 processor.

The mobile phone processor Apple is the strongest on the surface, there is no one and there is no doubt about it! It's a little early to compare Huawei's processors with Apple! It is a milestone event for Huawei to catch up with Qualcomm first, and Qualcomm processors are at least two generations away from Apple!

Don't listen to ** every day mouth hi! It's like domestic cars never mention the three major pieces when they advertise! Only by recognizing the gap can we make progress

I think the Huawei Kirin 980 is more powerful because Huawei's technology is getting stronger and stronger, and there is a lot of progress.

Kirin chips are far ahead of Apple in the field of 5G and AI, but the performance lags behind Apple's A13 processor.

It must be Apple's chips, Apple has been developing for many years, and Apple's chips are stronger than all other chips.

The performance of both phones is similar, but in terms of chip performance, the latter is superior.

Personally, I think Apple's chips are more powerful, after all, performance is Apple's advantage.

In fact, the performance is about the same, whether the mobile phone is good or not mainly depends on the chip, and I personally think the former is good.

I think these two are always compared, but I think it's pretty much the same.

I think Huawei's chips are stronger, because he has made this kind of thing in the development stage, which is really strong.

There is no doubt that the A13 chip is stronger, after all, Apple has been making chips for a longer time.

Let's compare the Huawei Mate 20 Pro to the iPhone XS Max. In Antutu, the Mate 20 Pro has a score of about 300,000 points; The iPhone XS Max is 370,000, which is still a big gap.

However, in the internationally renowned geekbench 4, the gap between the two is relatively small, for Kirin 980, the results are still quite eye-catching, although there is still a little distance from A12, but for the future of Huawei, it is still very optimistic, domestic products should be self-reliant!

The Snapdragon 845 has a running score of 270,000 points on the Antutu running score, but according to the information that broke the news, the running score of the Kirin 980 has reached more than 340,000 points! And the overall performance is 20% 30% higher than the Apple A11! Finally, there is good news that Huawei P20 Pro's sales in Europe have increased by more than 300 percent, which has brought a good start to domestic production!

Within Europe, Huawei has hot sales in three countries: France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, especially France, many people.

Theoretically, A11 is better, although the new 980 is strong, but after all, it is an Android machine that will be stuck after a long time, and the performance has decreased. Apple's A11 can last at least three years.

Aside from the heating current limit on the mobile phone On paper, the maximum performance of the 980 is about 20% weaker than that of the A11 single core, and the multi-core is the same The GPU performance of the 980 is the same as that of the A11 But when it is mounted on the mobile phone, the actual continuous performance is currently 90% of the current 980 can play 90% A11 can only play 70% The comprehensive 980 is the strongest mobile AP excluding A12.

Look at the use, if you don't play games, it's all the same, the machine signal is good with the Kirin processor, and Apple is still better at playing games.

Apple's A11 processor is much better, and Huawei's mobile phone processor is not good, playing games is stuck, and the heating is serious.

In terms of CPU performance alone, A11 should be stronger than 980GPU should be inferior to 980, but it is almost less, there is no difference in daily use, it depends on you.

The single-core processing power of the A11 is greater than that of the multi-core of the 709801 70980 than that of Apple's A411.

Personally, I feel that playing games or choosing Apple 8 or 8P for daily work uses Huawei P or Meat series.

Huawei nova5pro vs iphone 8, is Huawei hanging after installing a thousand apps?

It must be a closed system, at least the software used is relatively safe.

Apple is a little higher in terms of running scores, but there is not much difference in user experience.

It should be the Kirin 980, after all, it is a new processor.

Apple's A11 is good, and it must be good with its own system.

Theoretically, the A11 processor is smoother than the Kirin 980's.

Personal preference, or Apple's smoothness. Permanent.

This requires a combination of all the conditions, as well as the cost performance.

Theoretically, the performance output of the Apple A11 is better than that of the Kirin.

There is still a certain gap between A11,980 and A11.

The Kirin 980 processor is better.

To support domestic products, of course, is to choose 980

Apple A13 processor.

Process technology: Apple's A13 processor uses TSMC's 7nm EUV process, which is increased to 8.5 billion compared to A12's 6.5 billion transistors, improving performance.

Core combination: Apple A13 adopts a combination of 2+4, two performance cores, compared with A12, increased by 20%, and energy consumption is reduced by 40%; Four efficiency cores for 20% higher performance and 25% lower energy consumption.

GPU: The integrated 4-core GPU improves performance by 20% compared to A12, which is suitable for high-performance gaming, VR, and AR experiences.

Kirin 990 processor.

The Kirin 990 series processors, divided into two versions, focus on the 5G version of the Kirin 990.

Process technology: Kirin 990 5G uses TSMC's 7nm EUV process technology, which integrates 10.3 billion transistors, and because Kirin 990 integrates 5G baseband, a large part of it is occupied by baseband.

Core combination: Kirin 990 adopts a combination of 2+2+4, 2 A76 large cores, and the main frequency is; 2 A76 mid-cores, with the main frequency; 4 A55 small cores, the main frequency is:

Advantages of the Kirin 990:

Compared to Apple's A13 processor, the Kirin 990 has two major advantages.

First, the Kirin 990 5G has a built-in 5G baseband, supports 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G networks at the same time, and supports NSA and SA networking, which can meet the needs of the next 5 years. Apple A13 is plugged in Intel's 4G baseband, whether it fixes the "signal gate" problem of the previous generation of iPhone, it takes time to test.

Second, Kirin 990 is equipped with a self-developed Da Vinci architecture GPU, 2 large cores + 1 micro core, and it topped the ranking in the AI Benchmark running score.

In short, although Apple A13 has certain advantages in terms of CPU and GPU scores, Kirin 990 5G is better than Apple A13 in terms of baseband, and it also has certain advantages in AI.

The actual aspect is that Huawei's is stronger, and it should be more cost-effective for him.

Guo A13 adopts a combination of 2+4, two performance cores, compared with A12, increased by 20%, energy consumption reduced by 40%; Four efficiency cores for 20% higher performance and 25% lower energy consumption.

The chip system is the core, and the practicality is indescribable, and each machine is different.

, which can meet the needs of the next 5 years. Apple A13 is plugged in Intel's 4G baseband, whether it fixes the "signal gate" problem of the previous generation of iPhone, it takes time to test.

The performance bias of the two sides is different, so each has its own advantages, and who is strong and who is weak depends on practice.

Performance is not only about hardware, but also about the system, and one-sided comparisons are meaningless.

Kirin 990 against Apple A13 chip, the victory or defeat is clear at a glance, netizens: Huawei is mighty.

Apple's A-series processors will jam if they are used on Android, while Kirin and Snapdragon are not silky smooth but smooth when used on Mac, because the CPU requirements of the two systems are different. iOS is a typical single-task system, only the app displayed on the screen is running, and the background programs are really sleeping, so the A-series processor only needs to make 1 big core stronger, and the rest is soy sauce. Android is a multitasking system, which can run a bunch of apps in the background, and there is no real hibernation, resulting in Kirin and Snapdragon piling up 4 big cores.

Comparing the performance of one of the four major cores of the A series and the Kirin Snapdragon is obviously bullying.

Therefore, it is not practical to talk about CPU performance without the system.

The CPU performance of Huawei phones is not as good as that of Apple A13!

The lowest scores for each phone's CPU are as follows:

The Snapdragon 4G version 855P has a minimum score of 1909.

Apple's 4G version A13 has a minimum score of 1312 points.

Huawei 4G version 990 has a minimum score of 1175 points.

Apple's chips have always been silent, which does not need to be discussed, and it is difficult to say whether the next generation of Kirin can catch up with this generation of A13. But is it really the update of the chip that arouses your desire to change your phone now? I'm afraid not.

I'm afraid it's the endless innovations that emerge on the new flagship, for example, I want to buy a 1 7 right now, because it's good-looking.

It's hard to compare the two. However, it seems that Huawei's Kirin chip is even more powerful.

I have to admit that Apple's performance is better, but I still prefer our Chinese one.

I think the Kirin 990 is more powerful, because it is equipped with a 5G baseband.

Maybe the latter is actually more performant, and I prefer to drink.

Apple A13 and Huawei Kirin 990, who is the "glory of kings" in the chip industry?

I think they each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and they should be chosen according to different situations.

It should be that the actual application performance of the Apple A13 is more powerful, because Apple's technology is there.

It should be that the practicality of the latter is stronger, after all, he is a product of Huawei, isn't it?

The Kirin 990 is more powerful, because it is equipped with 5G baseband, and it is difficult to say whether the next generation of Kirin can catch up with this generation of A13.

Huawei mentioned it as early as 980 before it was born,Take the current Kirin 980 and Apple's A10 comparison,A10 will show better,Huawei official has also pointed out,Huawei's current 980 performance,GPU and so on are far inferior to A11A12 and so on。

Aside from the heating current limit on the mobile phone On paper, the maximum performance of the 980 is about 20% weaker than that of the A11 single core, and the multi-core is the same The GPU performance of the 980 is the same as that of the A11 But when it is mounted on the mobile phone, the actual continuous performance is currently 90% of the current 980 can play 90% A11 can only play 70% The comprehensive 980 is the strongest mobile AP excluding A12.

AppleA11The theoretical performance is better than that of 980, but the AI of 980 is powerful, and there is not much difference between the two processors in practice, both of which are now processed at the top.

The performance of the Apple A11 is a little better, but it is not about the same, and the Apple system is a little smoother than the Android system.

Of course, Apple, Apple sells the system, but Android's system is now very powerful, but the staying power is worse than Apple's, but the experience feels like Kirin 980 is temporarily powerful.