Are the image sensors of Nikon APS C frame the same size?

Nikon D5100 DX Format( X mm)CMOSNIKON D3100 DX Format( X mm)CMOSNIKON D3200 X MM CMOS You said yes D5100 CMOS is slightly larger, but it is only a few tenths of a millimeter difference, and the improvement of process technology in different periods has a greater impact. The CMOS area of the APS-C half-frame camera is twice as large as that of the APS-C half-frame camera, so the change in size is more noticeable.

The CMOS of the same APS-C specification Canon is smaller than that of Nikon, and the magnification of Nikon is , and the CANon is. And the imaging quality of the Canon is much better than that of the Nikon. Therefore, the slight difference in CMOS between cameras of the same specification with little difference in size will not have a direct impact on image quality.

Last but not least, the size of the CMOS is not 100% used for imaging, and some of the edges are left for imaging. As a result, the effective number of pixels in the CMOS will be less than the total number of pixels.

It must be the same size, APS-C is the standard size, D5100, D90, D3100, D300, D300S, D7000, all of them are the same size, if they are not the same large lens mount, the difference between the image sensor of the APS-C format is not the size of the frame, but the pixels, power consumption, sensitivity and other parameters, the size must be the same.

The dimensions are the same size.

Summary. Sensor size difference: The sensor size of the APS-C format is about the size, while the sensor size of the full-frame format is about 36mm and 24mm in size.

Difference in size and weight: APS-C format cameras are lighter and more portable, while full-frame cameras are heavier and larger.

The APS-C sensor is larger than the full-frame sensor.

Sensor size difference: The sensor size of the APS-C format is about the size, while the size of the full-frame Sakura frame is about 36mm and 24mm in size. Difference in size and weight of the fuselage:

APS-C format machines are lighter and more portable, while full-frame ones are heavier and larger.

Difference in quality: The full-frame sensor is larger in size and has more advantages in terms of image quality. In terms of high-sensitivity image quality, the full-frame has a very bright advantage.

Difference in lens conversion coefficient: the focal length used in full-frame is the actual shooting focal length, while the APS-C format needs to add the conversion experience coefficient to be the actual focal length of Wang Youji. APS-C lenses can no longer be used on full-frame bodies, but full-frame lenses can be used on half-frame bodies.

How to analyze this with photography knowledge**.

Hello dear, this one**, may have used streamer photography or time-lapse photography.

Summary. 1. Difference in sensor size.

APS-C format and full frame, first of all, the sensor size, the full frame is larger, so the image quality is better, the high sense is better, and the effect is better in bad light.

2. Difference in control.

Playing SLR, playing is manual, and it is the later stage. Therefore, the full-frame is often more expensive and at the same time, the manual control is better, faster and more accurate.

3. Difference in field of view.

The size of the non-full-frame sensor is less than half the size of the full-frame, and this difference is actually very large, and with the same lens, the non-full-frame is multiplied by the conversion factor of or, which leads to a lot of theories on 135 cameras that are not applicable to non-full-frame digital cameras, and the field of view is significantly reduced.

The APS-C sensor is larger than the full-frame sensor.

1. The difference between the sensor size is the APS-C format and the full frame, first of all, the sensor size, the full frame is larger, so the image quality is better, the high sense is better, and the effect is better in the case of bad light. 2. Manipulation of the difference between copyright, laughter, and talk about the cheese back to the royal answer network fast station it or the original author has played all the SLR, and the play is manual, and it is the later stage. Therefore, the full-frame is often more expensive and at the same time, the manual control is better, faster and more accurate.

3. The difference in the size of the field of view is less than half of the size of the full-frame image sensor This difference is actually very large With the same bumper lens, the conversion factor of the non-full-frame is multiplied by or This leads to a lot of theories on the 135 camera that are not applicable to the non-full-frame digital camera, and the field of view is significantly reduced.

4. The difference in resolution does not leave the total group from the rice boundary, and the acid circle. If the pixels are the same for non-full-frame and full-frame, because the area of the non-full-frame sensor is small, the density is too high, so when using a small aperture, there is diffraction, and the image quality will plummet, and the excessive density makes the lens a bottleneck, so it cannot provide more fine image quality, so the image of non-full-frame performance is blurry, low contrast, and high sensitivity imaging noise. 5. The difference between vignetting is that it is not easy to appear in the full frame at a large aperture, but it may appear in the whole frame.

The main reason is that the lens collides and merges, the larger the field of view, the light-concentrating effect of the lens, resulting in weak peripheral light and vignetting. Instead of the small full-frame sensitive area, it is difficult to appear in the light area of the ** used in the collection and masking, and the vignetting angle is difficult to appear compared to the full-frame. There is also a p-shaped format for beginners.

The P-type is a full-width frame with a 3:1 aspect ratio, which is called panorama mode. It will be easier for novices to operate.

This is the difference between an APS-C sensor and a full-frame sensor.

Then how to analyze the number of words in the ** I just sent.

Forehead. He used the spatial light effect.

Elongate the sense of space of the whole **.

It's that it has an elongated contrast before and after.

At the same time, the lighting effect increases the sense of movement of the whole picture.

The rushing light band enhances the fluidity and dynamics of the **, making the ** more powerful.

Do you think it's okay?

Summary. 1. The biggest difference is the size of the core sensor of the camera, full-frame refers to the size of the film that maintains the 36 24mm specification for 135 format, which currently refers to the sensor using this specification size, while the size of the image sensor of the half-frame camera is, the size of the image sensor of the full-frame camera is about twice that of the half-frame camera;

2. Relatively speaking, in the case of the same pixel in full frame, the area of the image sensor is larger than that of the APS-C sensor, and the richer the details and brightness and other elements it can record, and the better the picture performance;

3. In addition, the camera that generally uses full-frame is better than the camera products using APS-C in terms of handling and professional settings, and the average selling price of the body and lens is also higher than that of the camera products in APS-C format.

The APS-C sensor is larger than the full-frame sensor.

Hello, please wait patiently for a few minutes, we are quickly inquiring for you, and we will answer you as soon as possible.

APS-C format and full-frame cameras mainly differ from the sensor size and image quality. The size of the full-frame sensor is about twice that of a half-frame camera, and the full-frame image is richer in terms of image detail, sensitivity range, and image quality. In addition, full-frame cameras are generally higher than APS-C format cameras in terms of price and professionalism.

The detailed introduction of the first return is as follows:

1. The biggest difference is the size of the core sensor of the camera, full-frame refers to the size of the film that maintains the 36 24mm specification for 135 format, which currently refers to the sensor using this specification size, while the size of the image sensor of the half-frame camera is, the size of the image sensor of the full-frame camera is about twice that of the half-frame camera; 2. Relatively speaking, in the case of the same pixel in the full frame, the area of the image sensor is larger than that of the APS-C sensor, and the details and information sources and brightness that can be recorded will be more abundant, and the better the picture performance; 3. In addition, the camera that generally uses full-frame is better than the camera products using APS-C in terms of handling and professional settings, and the average selling price of the body and lens is also higher than that of the camera products in APS-C format.

Summary. As far as the description goes, no, the APSC sensor area is smaller than the full-frame. Here's why.

The sensor refers to the residual amplitude.

2.The full-frame sensor area is larger than the residual frame.

The APS-C sensor is larger than the full-frame sensor.

No, the APSC sensor area is smaller than the full-frame. The reason is as follows: the source banquet referred to by the sensor is the residual amplitude 2The full-frame sensor area is larger than the residual frame.

The area is from large to small, medium format, full frame residual frame. and 1 inch.

At high shutter speeds, moving objects exhibit motion blur, which is true or false.

OK. The second one asked, wrong.

Why. High shutter speed, faster than moving objects, clear images.

Okay, thank you. The shutter speed is slower than that of a moving object, so it is blurry.

Your understanding is one-sided.

The higher the pixel, the worse the imaging quality, this statement is prerequisite, only effective for small image sensors, such as the most commonly used 1-inch sensor for card machines, or more advanced 1-inch sensors, because the total area of this kind of sensor is too small, too high pixels will lead to too high pixel density, and the photosensitive area of a single pixel is too small, resulting in image quality details and high sensitivity can not be improved, so the pixels of high-end card machines with 1-inch sensors will not exceed 12 million.

For large-area sensors such as APS-C format used by SLR, even if the pixel density is increased, it will not cause the area of a single pixel to be too small, and the photosensitive area of a single pixel can also be improved through technical improvement to achieve a higher photosensitive area than low pixel density at high pixel density, and increasing the pixel is conducive to improving the details of the picture, and the high sensitivity can be achieved through the improvement and optimization of sensor technology and the improvement of software noise reduction algorithms to achieve the same or even better than low pixels.

The 18-million-pixel sensor used in 60D is technically more advanced than the 15-million-pixel sensor of 50D, and the processing power and optimization algorithm of the camera's internal processor are also more advanced, so the image quality of 60D is actually better than that of 50D.

Pixels are not the same as image quality, these are two concepts.

Pixels have nothing to do with image quality, but they have a direct relationship with the size of the output frame. To quote it, "For ordinary consumers, usually look at ** on the computer, if the **quality passes, 3 million pixels is enough, printing 5-8 inches**, 5 million pixels is enough, even if you want to print ** as big as a wedding photo - 30 inches, 12 million pixels are enough, if you don't have a larger size and detail output needs, then more pixels can not bring you a picture quality improvement, on the contrary, more pixels require you to have a larger capacity memory card, Larger capacity computer hard drives, and faster computers (otherwise it would be slow to open and process**). ”

In addition to the size of the image sensor, there are other comprehensive indicators, such as lenses, image processing, etc., that affect image quality.

While it is good to have more sensor pixels of the same size (this pixel is not the other), there is always a tipping point beyond which the sensitive area of a single pixel will shrink and the pixels will be too dense, which will affect image quality. But as long as it's within the critical range, the pixel increase is still a good thing.

For the image sensor, in addition to pixels, the biggest one is the high sensitivity control, which is why the pixels of the full-frame machine are not much larger than the half-frame, and the key is that the full-frame high-sensitivity control is better.

In fact, what you said is in a sense, but the image quality of a camera is also determined by many factors at the same time. For example, Nikon's flagship D4 pixel is only 1600W, and you can't say that his image quality is weaker than some mid-level full-length SLR. The Nikon D800 has 3600W pixels, but his image quality is no worse than that of the D600 700.

Theoretically, the lower the pixel density, the better the image quality and the less high-sensitivity noise.

However, the technology is constantly being updated, and although the old sensor has a low pixel density, the high sensitivity is not better than the new sensor, and the processing engine is also being updated.

So, "Isn't the quality of the Canon 60D worse than the image quality of the 50D?" your conclusion is wrong.

It's really such a theory,But to be precise, the larger the pixel density,The worse the image quality and high sensibility,But this is a premise,The minimum premise is that the technical level is the same,60D is newer than 50D,The technical level is higher,So the theory of the larger the pixel density is not very suitable for comparison。

If the size of the imaging unit is the same, the image quality is not much different, but the products of different eras are different. In addition, the advantage of high pixel density is that the resolution is high, and the size that can be enlarged is larger. The advantage of low pixel density is that the pixel area is large and the tolerance is better.