High tech Canon, professional Nikon,

It can't be said that Canon has done a very good job in the field of electronics for cameras.

For example, in terms of focusing speed (Canon's focusing speed is very fast, of course, the accuracy needs to be improved, and in addition, the top camera can achieve 45 points of eye control focusing, which is very accurate in my trial!!

The image processor of a digital camera (the well-known Digicii image processor, whose noise reduction ability is not comparable to that of Nikon).

There are great advantages in the manufacture of photoreceptors (Canon is able to manufacture five sizes of photoreceptors at the same time, supplying 350d, 30d, 5d, 1d2, and 1ds2).

Nikon's optical technology and traditional mechanical cameras (especially the FM2, F3, and F4 are all classics) have great advantages, but this advantage can be ignored in today's digitalization.

In addition, Canon has the best optical design capabilities at the moment, of course, only for the L head, and ordinary lenses are counted on.

I think there is a basis for this statement.

Canon covers a wide range of areas and updates are fast.

Nikon pays more attention to the development of the camera field, and is a little more calm in terms of technological updates.

Aren't all whites on the football field Canon's? It's not about who is good and who is bad, anyway, I personally like Nikon.

If you're a novice, you flip a coin and buy a Nikon on the front and a Canon on the tail.

Don't follow the crowd, what is "professional", what is "high-tech", as long as you like it.

Canon's renewal is fast.

Buy Nikon on the front and Canon on the back.

According to relevant information, in the international market, from the 60s of the last century to the present, Canon's market share in professional cameras is far greater than Nikon's. Today's civilian digital cameras, Canon's market share is the undisputed first, and Nikon's civilian cameras are not yet in the top 5.

In terms of professional cameras, Nikon of the same grade has better body workmanship, and Canon has an advantage in electronic technology. Canon already has thousands of patents registered in the United States, but Nikon seems to have very few.

The operation of Nikon cameras is cumbersome, and many operations require two hands to be used at the same time, which can be difficult to get used to at first! It seems to be designed to show professionalism. Many of Canon's settings are more electronic.

Professional cameras have to consider the lens group, generally speaking, Nikon's low-mid-end lenses are more affordable, and high-end lenses are more expensive than Canon's L-head (high-end lenses). Canon has a wider range of lenses to choose from!

In the field of sports and photojournalism, you can see that most journalists use Canon systems. Canon's switch from FD mount to EF mount was a bold decision at the time, as it would have lost a lot of customers, but now that Canon's decision-makers are undoubtedly too discerning! Because of its large mount, Canon has produced excellent lenses with huge apertures such as 50 85 35.

Nikon's reputation in China is relatively good, in the 80s and 90s of the last century, Nikon in China is almost synonymous with professional cameras, and indeed Nikon's film cameras are good!

In the digital age, Canon's technology has always been ahead of Nikon, and the first full-frame EOS 5D was launched by Canon, and it was nearly four years before Nikon launched the full-frame camera D700

Canon is a well-known listed company in Japan, and Nikon is a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, a large Japanese conglomerate.

There are no absolutes in everything, it makes sense to see what model and what kind of lens to compare, both of which have models from entry to professional, you can't compare professional machines with entry machines. There are also different lenses with different lenses, a good horse with a good saddle can play its performance, without a suitable controller, no matter how good the SLR is, it is useless. Ask how to learn photography, how to shoot a good ** is more meaningful, equipment is equipment after all, just a tool, primitive people use stones to survive, now there is a car and a nanny is also a way to live.

If you want to see which SLR is better, just look at it**, you get what you pay for.

Nikon's mount is still the old style, and in terms of expansion, Canon is good.

The rest is actually pretty much the same, depending on what effect you need.

Late strong Canon.

Late weak Nikon.