Which is better, HP DV4 1213 series or HP DV5 1218 series, help recommend it, high score reward

Let's talk about the price first, the market price of DV4 1213 is 6700, and the market price of DV5-1218 is more than 8000. Whoever is better, just look at the price.

However, the application determines the demand. The best is not necessarily the best.

In terms of configuration alone, the CPU and memory of the two are the same. There is no performance difference in daily use (such as surfing the Internet, hanging QQ, **).

But the graphics card of the DV5 1218 is much better. The performance of the 9600mgt is more than twice that of the 9200mgs. The game performance of DV5 1218 is quite good in a notebook, and online games are spikes, and large stand-alone machines are no problem.

The DV41213's gaming performance is mediocre, so don't expect to use it to play large 3D games (except for low-impact online games).

But a laptop is not a desktop. In addition to performance, it also depends on appearance, but also on heat dissipation. The DV4 1213 is an older product.

This can be seen from the motherboardPM965+ICH8 is already a platform of the previous generation. But an older product means it's a product that stands the test. Naturally, its heat dissipation is still good.

The DV4 1213 is the screen of 14, recognized ** size. The weight is about that.

DV5 1218 is the new platform. It is not clear whether the mold is new or not. The silver one still looks good.

Graphics cards are big heaters, especially high-performance graphics cards like 9600mgt have a lot of heat. At the same time, the 15-inch mold also increases the heat dissipation area. Overall, the heat dissipation may not be as good as that of the DV4 1213, but it shouldn't be too bad.

The 15-inch mold screen is large, and if you use the laptop as a desktop for a long time, the 15-inch is more suitable.

However, the 15-inch is less portable. If you just move your laptop from the living room to the study, and from the study to the bedroom, you don't have to worry about its weight. But if you often go out with a notebook, you have to consider whether the weight of the left and right can withstand ......

In terms of configuration and entertainment, it must be DV5 good, you see that the DV5 graphics card is GF 9600GT 512MDDR3, and DV4 is GF 9200GS 512MDDR2. The N-card GT series is definitely better than the GS. But if you want to consider portability, then the DV4 is definitely preferred, the DV5 is inch, and the DV4 is.

The 2 are basically different in weight, and the other functions are the same.,It's all with remote control,Ultra Blue Star audio。。。 There is also the difference above. The DV5** is at least 700-1000 more expensive than the DV4, depending on where you buy it.

When you buy a computer, it is recommended that you think about it carefully, and check the box carefully before opening the box to see if it has been opened!

This also looks good what you're doing here.,,If you often go out with the computer, it's DV4.,Use DV5 at home,,The screen of DV5 is a little bigger after all.,,It's better to play games.,,And the graphics card is also better,,, I recommend DV5.

The professional answer will also wait for you to buy it on May Day. Now it's changing so fast. You're looking at this now for more than 4,000. When I buy it on May Day, more than 4,000 may be much better than this configuration.

When you buy it, you can watch it whenever you want. Look at what configuration this ** can buy at that time. Or how much does this configuration cost. Now you just have to pay attention to the trend, the movement. Don't decide on the model, it's too early.

HP's machine is really not recommended, hey, I did it in DFI Cyberport, and HP has always come to smash the field.

I used DV5 before, but I stole it, and the B-sweat DV series is a video book, and the game book itself is configured to be biased towards entertainment, and the thickness and weight are relative.

The DM series is mainly ultra-thin and light, and there are some differences in performance, but the appearance is very good, if you are using it in the office, then the DM should be very suitable for you.

If you say that the DV series is good, or the DM series is good, I recommend ***V is more practical, although the point.

The DV4-3124TX is very good. The processor is Intel Core i3-2330M dual-core, and with discrete graphics, it is AMD Radeon HD 6750M 4GB RAM and 640GB hard disk The price is 5149 yuan.

DV4 positioning high-end CQ positioning is economical DV4 I personally think it looks a little better, the performance gap between T6400 and P7450 is very small, P7435, I don't know.

Playing WOW is basically a dual-core CPU or more easily competent. The key is the performance of the graphics card.

In fact, 8400mgs x2300 is enough to play WOW, but the effect can't be fully opened, and the performance of 9200mgs is definitely better than that of 8400, so as long as you don't pursue complete special effects, it is enough to play smoothly.

For a graphics card with 64bit memory bandwidth, 128 video memory is sufficient, 256 is already too much, and 512 is completely redundant, so the performance of both graphics cards can be considered the same.

Think of it this way: use a straw (memory width) to suck a bottle of water (memory capacity), suck the water into your mouth (transfer the data to the GPU), and swallow it (the GPU processes the data and outputs it to the screen), the size of the water bottle is different, but the straw is only that big, and the water that is sucked into the mouth is only that much per unit of time, so the speed of swallowing is the same. This is how you understand. For graphics cards, the most direct difference between good and bad is the bit width of the video memory: 64 bits are entry-level graphics cards, 128 bits are mainstream graphics cards, and 256 bits and above are high-end graphics cards.

The CQ series is a budget notebook. DV4 is a boutique type, and DV4 is good.

But the ** of DV4 is also expensive.

The workmanship of the CQ is not as good as that of the DV series.

Playing WOW requires a good graphics card, which has little to do with the processor. If you want to buy this and play WOW, give up these 2 models, all of which are entry-level graphics cards with average performance.

It's no problem to play WOW with DV5.

WOW is about to open 80, new special effects, new graphics, DV4 and CQ use 9200 running WOW is very difficult.

The cost performance is indeed high, but the DV4 has a hypothetical head and fingerprint recognition. It depends on your budget.

The same preparation of DV4 is about 1000 pieces higher than CQ. But the workmanship of DV4 is better than that of CQ.

Of course, it's DV4 Well, you can know from the above, the heat dissipation of the CQ series is not good.

HP CQ40-121AX

Processor: AMD Athlon, 64 x2, QL-62, RAM, 3GB

Hard drive 250g

Optical drive *** burning.

Video memory 512 display 14-inch WXGA mirror high-brightness widescreen.

Graphics chip ATI HD3450 discrete graphics card.

I bought it at 4300 and played WOW double open as if it wasn't open, the speed is fast, absolutely awesome!!

It is enough to buy HP's CQ series, which is cost-effective, and the appearance and workmanship are also good, it is recommended that you buy this series, like the CQ40 series.

HP notebooks are not cost-effective, and the single pursuit of appearance can only deceive little girls.

Originally, I was the first to answer, but something was delayed. HP sells more, but I'm never bullish. Heat dissipation molds are problematic. At the same level, you can buy Lenovo, which is quite popular! For example, the Y450 Ito-row is quite good.

If you have money, it is recommended that you buy the Lenovo IBM series.

It's just that HP's words, playing games is generally a DV series. 15-inch DV5 and 14-inch DV4. Usually the DV5 graphics card and heat dissipation will be better.

Laptops are not originally made for gaming, and if you like to play super-large 3D games, a desktop assembly machine is recommended. **Cheaper, more flexible configuration, larger screen.

It is recommended to buy a desktop computer! Because industrial design often needs to use some 3D software rendering, the graphics card is not good, the configuration is not high, and the heat dissipation performance is not good, you can render a picture to blow up the machine! I studied industrial design, and I couldn't even install the latest version of the modeling software in the laptops in my dormitory.

I have HP's ** in my space, and if you go in and compare the configuration and cost performance, it's about the same.

More than 6000 can basically meet your requirements.

DV4-1213 The appearance is good, and the cost performance is quite high...

The DV3 series is also good...

ThinkPad R400 series.

It's definitely much better than HP.

DV5 graphics cards are high and suitable for design.

Why do you still buy HP when you study industrial design?

HP's graphics cards do not dare to compliment.