If you know the law, please come in and help! Thank you! How do you know that the inspection hospita

Generally, a notice will be sent to you, if it is not a self-investigation case, the public security organ is an investigative agency, and will issue a prosecution opinion to you after entering the review and prosecution stage.

The procuratorate is in the stage of reviewing and prosecuting, right?

Only crimes committed by State agents are investigated in the Public Prosecutor's Office.

Just go to the reconnaissance agency and ask.

It depends on whether the case is handled by the procuratorate or by the public security bureau. The procuratorate directly handles the investigation first and then prosecutes. When the public security bureau is transferred to the procuratorate, it will enter the prosecution stage.

1. Have you received a notice of detention?

2. Have you received a notice of arrest?

If the case is transferred to the procuratorate, there are two possibilities: one is at the arrest stage, and the second is at the review and prosecution stage. For specific requests, family members can go to the procuratorate to find out.

In accordance with the law, the investigating organs will notify the family members to be detained or arrested within a specified time limit. Written notice.

There are two possibilities: one is at the stage of approving arrest, and the second is at the stage of review and prosecution. For specific requests, family members can go to the procuratorate to find out. You can also entrust a lawyer to handle it. Thank you!

In fact, the procuratorate should inform the family that the case has been brought to the procuratorate, and as a family member, you can go to the procuratorate and go to the prosecutor in charge of the case to find out. If it is transferred from the prosecutor's court to the court, the court will also notify the family of the case to the court, and the family will be notified of the next time.

Within 3 days of receiving the materials transferred for review for prosecution, the procuratorate shall inform the criminal suspect that he or she has the right to retain a defender. A decision on whether to prosecute is made within one month. The court shall serve a copy of the prosecutor's indictment on the defendant before the first 10 days. There is no hard and fast rule that the family should be notified.

1. The facts and circumstances of the crime are clear, whether the evidence is credible and sufficient, and whether the nature of the crime and the determination of the charges are correct. 2. Whether there are any omitted crimes and other persons who should be held criminally responsible. 3. Whether it is a circumstance that should not be pursued for criminal liability.

4 Whether there is an attached civil lawsuit. 5. Legality of investigative activities.

Article 250 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure of the People's Procuratorate provides:

When the people's procuratorate examines a case transferred for prosecution, it must ascertain:

1) Whether the criminal suspect's identity is clear, including name, gender, nationality, date of birth, occupation, unit, and so forth;

2) Whether the facts and circumstances of the crime are clear, and whether the opinions on determining the nature of the crime and the charges are correct; There are circumstances that are not legally prescribed for aggravating, mitigating, mitigating, or waiving punishment; whether the determination of the responsibility of the criminal suspect in the criminal activity in the case of joint crime is appropriate;

3) Whether the evidentiary materials were transferred with the case, and whether the list, copies, or other supporting documents of the evidence that should not be transferred were transferred with the case;

4) Whether the evidence is credible and sufficient;

5) Whether there are any omitted crimes and other persons who should be pursued for criminal responsibility;

6) Whether it is criminal responsibility that should not be pursued;

7) Whether there is an attached civil lawsuit; Whether it is necessary for the people's procuratorate to initiate an attached civil lawsuit if state property or collective property suffers losses;

8) whether the compulsory measures taken are appropriate;

9) Whether the investigative activities are lawful;

10) Whether assets related to the crime and their fruits have been seized, frozen, and properly kept for verification.

Of course, the facts of the case must be ascertained and the evidence must be obtained, and in addition, it is the procuratorate, not the procuratorate.

Epilepsy is a mental illness, and a mentally ill person is completely unable to recognize the consequences of his or her own actions, he is a person who lacks capacity for civil conduct, and where a person without capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, his guardian shall bear the responsibility for compensation. Therefore, it is up to the guardian of the person with epilepsy to take responsibility.

The man who hit the person or his family should pay for the costs.

If your husband, as you said, didn't know before the theft, just to drive, after arriving, after knowing, he did not stop or call the police, but continued to drive for them, which proves that your husband is also one of the perpetrators, you said that you only gave your husband 500 yuan of hardship money, this 500 yuan is in front of the law is to share the spoils, but your husband did not refuse, so your husband will also be sentenced, but you have to find a better lawyer to prove that before your husband stole the theft, he was not clear about the case at all, To prove that your husband was forced to drive after arriving at the place where the crime was committed, the sentence will be much less.

If you don't know, yes there is evidence, and it's useless without witnesses.

I think because you're the owner of the car, you may be awarded compensation, or joint and several compensation, and this is up to the court, and if your friend really can't afford it, then you can only consider yourself unlucky, and never borrow a car again, no one can do it, or you will drive there, and it will be more troublesome if you have an accident, and there is full insurance, so the insurance company will pay a little more.

The contract between Party A and Party B and the contract between Party B and Party C are not a legal relationship, and each party establishes a contractual relationship with the other party. Therefore, no matter how Party A and Party B sign the contract, it has no direct relationship with Party C. Party C shall defend the rights and interests of Party B in accordance with the contract with Party B, and if Party B breaches the contract with Party C due to Party A's reasons, Party C may pursue Party B's liability for breach of contract, and Party C's remedy shall be completely dependent on the contract with Party B.

Therefore: 1. Party C has no right to read the contract between Party A and Party B;

2. If Party A takes back the shop, Party C may claim the liability for breach of contract against Party B in accordance with the contract.

First, Party C has reason to look at the contract between Party A and Party B; Because he (Party C) is already a subject in this contract dispute, in order to protect his legitimate rights and interests from illegal infringement, he has every right to claim the real contract of both parties A and B, and if necessary, he can make a copy of the bottom!

Second, if the above is true, (1:,, Party B shall not sublease and transfer,,,2: Party A only requires Party B to rectify, and does not require decoration, let alone Party C's contribution,,, Party B is suspected of defrauding Party C.

1. A defendant can only be one person and cannot be two people.

2. I don't know the details, I don't know the experience, and I can't judge.

3. Release on bail pending trial is a compulsory measure before trial, and it is unlikely that he will be released on bail again after the arrest has been approved, and it is helpful to obtain a suspended sentence with a letter of understanding, but there is a prerequisite for a suspended sentence (sentenced to less than three years), and I don't know if this premise can be met.