Urgently, Canon 550D s glasses 20

This is not recommended.

Not all focal lengths are the best.

It depends on what focal length you need.

I like to shoot landscapes at the wide-angle end.

Portraits 85 135 200 are good.

Going up there, it's used to hunt birds.

I suggest that the landlord 18-55 with a fixed focus telephoto segment, such as 85, is not expensive, and you have a problem with these heads, that is, the aperture is too small, all with a large aperture fixed focus is more suitable.

A dual-lens set is recommended. The 18-135 has the same effect as the 18-55, but the focal length is slightly longer. The key ** is similar to 18-55 plus 55-250 two lenses together, the cost performance is not good, but it looks a little more handsome.

Also, don't buy 75-300, it's too old and hasn't stabilized yet. Recommend the inexpensive 55-250is. Under Xiaoxiaobai, there is no telephoto head that can compare to this, **1500 or so.

If you add 50mm, it is a standard starter three-piece set. Not only is it cheap, practical, and imaging is also acceptable.

In addition, telephoto heads are rarely used, and you will find that 18-55 lenses are used 90% of the time.

Personal opinion: If you don't mind changing lenses when you need to, dual lenses are better.

Reason: The 300 focal length is much farther than the single-lens 135 shots, so the dual-lens set is complete with wide-angle, medium-focus, and telephoto.

Usually, you can install that 18-55mm hang-up to shoot landscapes and portraits, and you need a telephoto far away to change your head.

Some of the brothers upstairs, I really don't know what you're doing with a dual-lens suit? Have you ever deserved it? Is there a high probability that the telephoto will be used? 99% of the time the telephoto lens is used in sleep or as a telescope, what do you use telephoto to shoot?

Once you have figured out these questions, you will know that you are so irresponsible. 18-135 is about the same as a focal length of 28-200, isn't it enough? The most people who use the full-frame machine are to go out and bring a 200mm lens, why don't you have enough?

lz, actually, my biggest personal experience for so long is that I can change the lens less, especially the telephoto. Do you know how awkward that 70-300 is to install on APS? If you don't believe it, borrow one from someone else and experience the 70mm end yourself, let alone the 300 end.

Actually, 18-135 is enough. Then with a few fixed focuses, such as 35, 50, 85, you can meet 95% of your requirements. Of course, if you are looking for the most cost-effective 18-55+ a few fixed focals is a very good choice, but sometimes you will feel that the focal length is slightly shorter than the length.

The latter configuration is recommended, and the 18-55 is also good as a hang-up head. In addition, the lens structure of the 18-135 is not very outstanding, and the cost performance is not high.

Most of the people who choose EOS 550D are because the money is not very rich, and the purchase is mainly for daily family and travel use. Since the silver is not very abundant, you can only put on some economical and practical lenses first, and when the photography skills are improved and the silver is also abundant, you can use medium and high-end lenses and full-frame bodies. Therefore:

First, I want to be convenient and practical (one mirror hangs up for a long time) and save money. On the upper set of machine heads18-135mm, this head with 550d is actually 29-216mm, there is a certain wide angle (29mm) and moderate telephoto (216mm), the full set (including the body) is about 6900 yuan.

Second, I want to be convenient and practical (one lens hangs up for a long time), and I want to pat the flowers, animals, mm, and gg in the distance. On the upper set of machine head 18-200mm, this head with 550d is actually 29-320mm, there is a certain wide angle (29mm) and practical telephoto (320mm), the full set (including the body) in 7600 yuan left.

3. I want to save money, and I want to make the ** I shoot relatively better. On long: 18-55mm+50.

The 18-55mm set head has a 29mm wide angle and an 88mm medium focus, which is only more than 600, and 50 has a large aperture, which is Canon's most affordable large-aperture fixed-focus portrait head, only about 700, and 55-250mm has a 400mm telephoto, which is the most cost-effective in Canon's long zoom head, only about 1600. The full set (including the fuselage) is about 7000, which is cheap and practical.

Fourth, the silver is not too abundant, and I want to shoot a better quality**. Go up 17-40mm first, and then go up to 50 after preparing silver. The full set (including the fuselage) requires more than 20,000.

The reason why Canon and Nikon have dozens of lenses is mainly to meet the needs of different people, different shooting occasions, and different quality needs. It is necessary to know more about the performance, use and photography of various lenses, and combine them with their own needs and economic ability to choose the lens that suits them.

Never with the worst dog head of 18-55!!

1. From the perspective of your use, it is to make a picture album, and the requirements for the clarity and color restoration of the first are relatively high! I must use a lens with high resolution!! 18-55 is not up to the mark!!

Second, if you want to shoot the production workshop, sometimes the space may not be large enough, so the wider the angle, the better.

Third, the light in the workshop is not as good as the outdoors, but the workshop is not very suitable for flash (this point on the first floor of the friends to think more, if the flash crosses 8 meters, basically it will not be used, and even if it can be used, the close range is white to death, nothing can be seen clearly) This requires the lens to have a large aperture, the bigger the better. to meet the requirements of light that is not too strong.

The rest of the requirements will be easy to handle.

Combining the above situation, considering all aspects of cost performance, it is recommended to use Tenron's 17-50 F without anti-shake, 2800 yuan. With anti-shake, 3600 yuan!! This constant wide-aperture lens is currently the most cost-effective one!!

It is also the most awarded one in the world!!

For beginners, the 18-55is and 50 will do, and you can also have a 430EX flash for indoor shooting, and if you want to be stable, you can also configure a regular tripod.

18-200, which belongs to the end of the world with one lens, has both wide angle and telephoto, and is economical. The ones you mentioned are enough for this one shot. But the professionalism of the lens belongs to the entry-level, after all, the 550D is also the entry-level, and the economic strength of the lens with too good lens also needs to be seen.

If you shoot portraits, you don't need to focus on them, after all, you are not a portrait professional.

You play like this first, and after a period of learning and use, you will find out what you need, and it is useless to ask before buying.

But if you can afford it, I recommend that you have a high-end lens with a red circle, because (Canon is a red circle) premium lens is value-added.

In addition, beginners should not buy lenses from other manufacturers, you may not be able to deal with many technical problems. I'll talk about it when it's cooked.

With 18-135 is the best, don't use 18-200, the side factory lens should not be out of focus, 550 and without the function of adjusting the focus, you need a class10 card for accessories, and the other depends on personal needs, the card is not cheap, you can try not to use domestic batteries, UV, it is best not to use the hood, and the anti-collision screen is recommended to start, which is more practical.