The ideological tendencies of the Warring States Policy are contrary to Confucian orthodoxy, is it s

It should be readable, and each thought must have relative things, and different things may be viewed with different thoughts.

I think it's a certain readability, because after all, he also has some things that Confucianism doesn't have, and the two can learn from each other.

I think he's still readable. Although it does not conform to some of the contents of Confucianism, it also has its own value of existence, after all, it is also a famous book.

I think there is continuity, whether it is the idea of "Warring States Policy" or the orthodox thought of Confucianism, it is all classical Chinese cultural thought, and they are all readable.

I think that every idea has its trustworthiness, and it may be contrary to another thought, but it is the crystallization of our human wisdom, and we should inherit it.

Needless to say, just like when you go to the vegetable market to buy vegetables, you have to shop around, orthodox thinking also has shortcomings, there must be a teacher for threesomes, and Confucianism is also a collection of hundreds of schools of thought to grow up.

It's a very deep question, and I think it's still very readable. What do you think?

Warring States Policy is readable. Because it is also telling some epics, and then it has gained some experience and solutions that future generations can learn from.

1. Confucius and his ideological proposition: Confucius, a native of the late Spring and Autumn Period, was the founder of Confucianism, laid the foundation for the formation of Confucianism, and was called a sage by later generations; Its ideological propositions are: The core of the idea is benevolence, "love others", "refrain from retribution", and "do not do to others what you do not want".

He advocates "politics and morality" and "love people with frugality". His ideas of "benevolence" and "government and morality" include people-oriented thoughts. The educational ideology is relatively progressive, advocating "education without class", vigorously establishing private schools, and sorting out the Six Classics.

2. Mencius, a native of the middle of the Warring States period, his main ideas are: known as "Yasheng"; The ideological propositions are: the idea of "benevolence" is developed into "benevolent government", advocating that "if you do not govern the world with benevolence, you cannot rule the world peacefully", "govern benevolently with the people, save punishments, and collect taxes with thin taxes"; He put forward the people-oriented idea of "the people are noble and the monarch is light", and believed that the people and the country are more important than the monarch.

He put forward the ethical concept of "sexual goodness".

3. Xunzi, a native of the late Warring States Period, advocated benevolence and righteousness, "royal road", and "convincing people with virtue"; put forward the people-oriented idea of "Junzhou and Minshui"; put forward the ethics of "sexual evil"; Advocate for the rule of law. Xunzi contribution:

He reformed Confucianism and integrated the positive and rational elements of Legalism and Taoism, so that Confucianism could better meet the needs of social development. During the Warring States Period, Confucianism was developed by Meng Xun and became a great sect among the hundreds of sons.

In simple terms,"Warring States Policy".It is a history book that records a historical period of more than 200 years. This book chronicles the events of Gao Jianli from the story of Zhibo. Although the story is not very content, this book is indeed an indispensable book for scholars to study the culture of the Warring States period.

However, its implicit value is not recognized by many Confucians.

The pants rock recognized. I think "Warring States Policy" is also readable, unlike Confucianism, which means that "Warring States Policy" is a bad book or an unreadable book.

In addition to the books created by Confucianism, Baijia has also created many excellent works, which are all products of an era from which we can learn some knowledge. Although the book "Warring States Policy" is for historians.

The study of the history of the Warring States period is very helpful, but it is rejected by many Confucian scholars in terms of market view. We may wonder why such a historically significant book would be rejected by Confucianism. If you want to know the reason for this, you have to start with the characteristic humanities of the Warring States period.

Warring States Policy can be said to be a book in the history of China. The Warring States Policy is also called the National Policy.

The book describes the Western Zhou Dynasty.

Eastern Zhou, as well as Qin, Qi, Chu, Zhao, Wei, Han, Yan, Song, Wei, and Zhongshan. According to records, this era began in the early years of the Warring States period and ended with the destruction of the Six Kingdoms by the Qin Dynasty, which has a history of 240 years. "Warring States Policy" is divided into 12 strategies, 33 volumes, a total of 497 articles, mainly written about the political ideas of lobbyists in the Warring States period and the military strategy of Xiangchun destruction, which can also be said to be the practical work of lobbyists.

The "Warring States Policy" we see now is not a complete book. This is because many of the original works were lost at the time of circulation, and many scholars in later generations made many additions and modifications to the book.

As a result of the addition of authors, the main central ideas of this Warring States policy that we see now are mixed with the ideas it wants to promote. The Warring States policy mainly embodied the idea of putting people first. During the Warring States period, people-oriented thought.

Very prevalent. Some of the provisions in the Warring States Policy show the importance of human power. For example, "Zhao Houwei asked the Qi family" put the status of commoners above the status of the monarch, thinking that "if there is no one, why is there a cautious monarch?" (Qi Ce 4) This is the same as Mencius.

There are many similarities in the theory of "valuing the people over the king". For another example, Feng Tan is Meng Weijun.

The three caves of "Burning Coupons" and "Chengyi" were built, so that the younger students shouted "Long live". Although it is to buy people's hearts, it also shows that the current aristocracy is dangerous.

Because the author's writing is very good, and it is a kind of history book that is different from the country to Li Ji, expounding some things in the Warring States Period, which has great historical value, and the characters described in it are very realistic, and a lot of rhetorical techniques are used to disturb the hail.

Although this kind of thought is contrary to Confucianism, there are many kinds of ideas that were circulated in the dynasties at that time, and each of them has a different school of thought, so it is only because Gao Jian can let this kind of thought circulate in the world.

Because this work is very wonderful, and this work has been blocked by the rolling wax flow Hongbei Hu, and this work tells us a lot of truths, so this work can still be passed on to future generations.

In this way, it is because these things are the history of China's development, and they have also witnessed the development process of our country, so they can be passed on.

It can be understood from four distinctions:

1. Advocating political ideology of strategy and strategy. The Warring States strategists regarded stratagem as the decisive factor in determining the rise and fall of the country, and one-sidedly exaggerated the omnipotence of stratagem.

Second, the idea of employing people with merit and ability. Attaching importance to the role of scholars and demanding that the status of scholars be raised is a kind of ideological tendency of the virtuous and virtuous, which is of definite progressive significance.

3. The philosophy of life of striving for profit and fame. The Zonghengjia openly preached the pursuit of power and wealth, the pursuit of fame and fortune, and even did not pay attention to faith and righteousness, unscrupulous means, and deceit, which was incompatible with the Confucian moral concept of valuing righteousness over profit, and it was precisely because of this that the spine faction was criticized and attacked by later generations of orthodox scholars. Call it the Book of Deviant Ways and the Great Poisonous Weed.

It should be pointed out that this outlook on life is selfish, despicable, and even ugly, but they dare to break through the shackles of old ideas, boldly challenge traditional morality and ethics, openly propagate shocking views, and pursue enterprising and promising ways, but they are true and frank.

Fourth, the policy of judging the situation and sizing up the situation. The Zongheng family relies on strategy and lobbying as capital for the purpose of seeking fame and fortune, so they attach special importance to seizing opportunities and opportunities, and regard them as the decisive conditions for determining the success or failure of things.

Warring States Policy, also known as "National Policy", is a work of national historiography in the history of Chinese literature. Its starting date is recorded in the early years of the Warring States period, including the Western Zhou Dynasty.

The major events that occurred between the Eastern Zhou, Qin, Qi, Yan, Zhao, Wei, Song and other states were finally recorded until the unification of the world by Qin. It has a history of more than 240 years, and mainly describes the political ideas and words and deeds strategies propagated by travelers in various countries during the Warring States period. This history book is an important reference material for the study of the history of the Warring States period, due to the various ideological and political tendencies and Confucianism in this book.

It conflicted with political leanings, so it was criticized by later scholars. <>

1. It is contrary to the orthodox Confucian way.

"Warring States Policy" was once called a book of "evil arts" and "deviant" by the majority of scholars and readers. Its self-contained family can be said to be a vertical and horizontal family.

It draws on different scholars in various aspects, for example, in terms of moral thought, it tends to be more Taoist thought.

Social and political thought is based on Legalism. However, in every respect, it has nothing in common with Confucianism. As we all know, Confucianism has a variety of ideas that meet the needs of our modern social development and help us think in all aspects of life.

Second, there are many authors, and the ideas are not unified.

At the same time, the author of this book is a person from a different period, and different people have different thoughts.

Thirty-three articles were compiled, and the titles of the books were drawn up by him; In the Song Dynasty, by Zeng Gong.

It has been repaired, and it has been revised in the Eastern Han Dynasty as well as in modern times. Therefore, in terms of the content of the book, each chapter is not very connected, independent of each other, and not systematic enough. At the same time, many scholars and contemporaries of the "Zuo Chuan".

Compared with the events of the same period, the Chinese found many differences, and it is not very credible and untrue to evaluate it as a historical record. The ideas and concepts in the "Warring States Policy" were not consistent with the mainstream concepts at that time, but they also relatively reflected some of the concepts and attitudes of the people at that time, and they valued the power of the people more, and exposed the cruelty and ruthlessness of some wars. <>

In short, although the "Warring States Policy" is contrary to Confucianism, it is also different from the mainstream thought. However, it is full of literary brilliance in terms of narration and reasoning, and it is partly worth studying.

Because many pieces of the Warring States Policy book have been lost in the process of circulation, many of the contents are relatively imitative and fantastical, and they will be criticized by later scholars. Prepare for the nucleus.

Because this work has a lot of conflicts with traditional Confucian thought, many scholars follow traditional Confucian thought, so it will be criticized.

Because the literary attributes of "Warring States Policy" are too strong, it is logically impossible to form a closed loop.