Some people say, I value character, not ability , what do you think?

I don't think that's a whole story, but a person's character and ability are equally important. Ability is the foundation of his life, it is the proof that he supports himself, and character is the necessary condition for him to continue to get along with others, so I think both are equally important.

It should be said that everyone's point of view on this issue is different, and I agree with it, I have always advocated that character comes first, and ability comes second. No matter how strong the ability is, if there is no good character, then whether this ability can play its positive role is unknown, and examples in real work and life are not uncommon. Good character and even if the ability is poor, it has no negative effect, the ability is constantly improved in the training and exercise, and the character is not easy to change.

Why does the party and the country insist on having both ability and political integrity and putting morality first when selecting and employing people? This is evident from this.

Character and ability are sometimes relative, a person's character is particularly good, it proves that his ability is also very strong, his ability and character are sometimes relative, so look at a person's character, that is to say, his ability is also very good.

I think character is very important, character is the basis of human ability, is the scarce and precious quality label in today's society, character and ability are like the left and right hands, single ability without character will be incomplete.

The first is to look at the character, his character is very positive, but the ability is not strong, then this person is worth communicating, the ability can be cultivated, if his character is not right, but the ability is very strong, such a person is very scary, must be avoided.

I think character and ability are equally important, a person has a good character, but has no ability, I'm sorry, I don't raise idlers, a person has the ability, but the character is not good, I'm sorry, I can't afford you as a person.

I feel that the sentence "I value character, not ability" is very right, a person's character is not good, no matter how strong his ability is, he cannot take on heavy responsibilities.

Character and ability are very important, but I think character is a more basic and important thing, and people who have the ability to have no character are terrible and may disrupt the social order.

I agree with this sentence, ability can be cultivated if it is not good, but character is not easy to change.

In fact, character and ability are very important, no matter how good the character is, there is no ability and can not develop for a long time, capable, but the lack of character is not good.

I think this statement can be valid, and I also feel that character is more important than ability, and if a person has great ability but no character, then his ability will be harmful to society.

I very much agree with this point of view, after all, I think that character is more important than ability, and ability does not necessarily mean that his character is good.

This is for sure, no matter in that era, character will be more important than ability. We often hear about "improving ability", which means that ability can be improved slowly, and a person's character is difficult to change. Therefore, character is often the primary factor considered by many employers.

In fact, I think that sometimes a person's character is better, then his ability will also be improved.

This is indeed true, and if you have a good character, your natural ability will improve.

Personally, I don't think everyone thinks so, although he says it this way, just so that others don't look down on him.

The white-handed attack is low, and even a set of down only gets a quarter, and only a fifth of the plate armor can be hit, and the colorless skill can only play a little bit of blood that can not be less, and the whole profession is the weakest.

Character is more important, if the person's ability is not good, it can be exercised in the later stage, if the person's character is not good, this cannot be changed. I will choose employees with good character.

I think character is more important, because ability can be cultivated, but character cannot be changed.

Ability is particularly important, having a good ability can earn a lot of benefits for the company in the future, and it will also make a lot of money for yourself, why not?

If I'm the boss, I like to use people who have good character but not good ability. Because good character is the most important thing, if the character is not good, it is useless to have strong ability.

I like the former, although these people's abilities are not good, but their three views are very positive, and their character is also very good, so the future room for improvement is relatively large.

Ability and character are very important!

But if you have to choose one or the other, you will generally choose character.

Someone has character and ability, and he is a superior talent.

Some people are incapable, and they are medium talents.

No character, no ability, is an inferior talent.

No one has the ability to be a sinful.

Ability is very important, but there is one thing more important than ability, that is, character. Character and ability are like the left hand and the right hand: if there is only ability, but without character, man will be incomplete. Character determines attitude, attitude determines behavior, and behavior determines the final result.

Generally speaking. It's like this that character is more important than ability, but in fact, when it comes to work, I think that being able to understand ability is also a very important thing, and it is essential. He is very tactful, which leads to the fact that everyone likes him very much from his leaders or colleagues.

No, it's all important, character is important, ability is also important, there is no ability and uselessness, there is character, and there is ability, this talent is strong.

Ability is also important, but character is even more important. That's the right point.

Because ability is not only an important character, but also important, relatively speaking, character is more important, but it cannot be without ability, both are equally important.

Ability is important, character is also important, if a person's character is very good, but belongs to the three no products, no knowledge, no ability, no experience, then no matter how good the character is, he will not be admitted, he is not qualified for the company's work, and he cannot support himself in life.

Ability is more important than character, ability can solve problems, character cannot. And in a person's life, all difficulties are problems.

If you compare ability and character, character is more important in life.

If a person's ability is better, but his character is really poor, it is a very bad thing.

Therefore, in life, we must first have an excellent character, which is the most important thing, ability, which can be cultivated slowly.

Ability is not important, but character is more important? What two people say is more important, if you want to say it, it must be the character first and then the ability, so that the person will do better.

I think ability and character are important, ability is the foundation, and character is the icing on the cake.

A person's character is the most important, and a good character is half the success of the career, but if you just have a good character, you will say that you have no ability, and you can succeed with good character and ability.

Ability is not important, character is more important? I think it's not the right ability to say this, it's not the important thing, the important thing is the character, if the character is upright, you can do any job better.

It's all important, these two are not opposites, if you have a good character and ability, it's the best, if you have the ability, the character is generally fine, anyway, people now recognize money and don't recognize people.

Ability is very important and can help you have a better status and earn a lot of money. But character is more important. If everyone is disgusted, then no matter how much money you have, no matter how good your status is, you will be lonely.

Individuals feel that ability and character are important, although character is the basic standard to test a person's morality, but also the basic principle of getting along with others, but in the work only character is not enough, work ability is equally important.

Ability and character are first and foremost more important about character, if his character is not good, no matter how strong he can be, it is just a tool that will only make money.

Personally, if you think that if you compare your ability and character, then you must be more important about your character. But competence is also very important, depending on the results of your work.

Of course, ability is important, but compared with character, it is more important to pay attention to character, because people with good character can be entrusted with heavy responsibilities.

You also represent a person's executive ability, and character includes a lot, including the parents' shortcomings, dealing with people and all aspects, if I have to choose, I would rather choose character than choose ability, no matter how capable the person is not good, it is not desirable.

Ability and character are important, only ability and no character, you will encounter a lot of difficulties when you work, and no one will help you.

Ability and character are equally important, because in real life the two tend to be incompatible, so that you can gain a foothold in society.

People's ability is also important, character is more important, so ability is not important, what ability you don't have will say, just play tricks and blame people for good character is in vain, you can't create performance, you must also have the ability. Where can I eat?

Ability is important, character is more important, and people who have both are more important.

Ability and character are important, and if you can have both, then you must be a big winner in your personal life.

I feel that for a person, it must be a combination of character and ability, and both are indispensable.

Both are important, but if you choose only one, it is more reliable in character.

It should be that ability is very important, and character is more important.

Both are important, and it is best to have both ability and political integrity.

In the selection of leaders and personnel, there is no absolute answer to the question of attaching importance to ability or character. Different leaders may have different preferences and weights, and the specifics will vary depending on the nature of the organization, the culture of alignment, and the requirements of the role.

Competency is the skills, knowledge, and experience a person needs to do a job. Valuing competency ensures that leaders are selected to complete tasks and effectively drive the organization's growth. However, if you focus only on competence and neglect to sell good character, it can lead to some negative consequences, such as moral anomie, teamwork problems, or lack of leadership qualities.

Character involves an individual's moral character, values, and code of conduct. Valuing character leads to good leadership and role models, which can help build a healthy organizational culture and a positive work atmosphere. Good character also strengthens teamwork, trust, and employee loyalty.

Therefore, a comprehensive view is that when leaders and appoint people, they should balance their ability and character. Focusing on ability ensures that leaders are competent in their work, while focusing on character helps to create a positive leadership image and cultural integrity. The best course of action is to look for candidates who are both capable and of good character to improve the performance of the organization and the cohesion of the team.

As a leader, in terms of employing people, ability and character are very important factors, and the two cannot be easily traded-off. Which one is more important may depend on the company culture, the characteristics of the job role, and individual circumstances.

1.Character: This is a person's basic morals and values, including their honesty, trust, sense of responsibility, and teamwork attitude.

It is very important for the long-term development of a company that an employee with good character can establish a working environment of trust and respect. This is also the factor that many companies prefer to investigate.

2.Ability: It is the skills and knowledge that a person has to do a job. In some roles that require specific skills or knowledge, competencies may be even more important. Without the appropriate skills and knowledge, the task may not be completed.

Ideally, leaders should look for employees who are both capable and of good character. If you have to choose between the two, it may need to be decided based on specific roles and company culture. For roles that require teamwork or long-term business development, there may be a tendency to place more emphasis on character.

For roles that require specific skills and knowledge, more emphasis may be placed on competency.

I don't think that ability is more important than character, and there is no moral bottom for a dull respect.

The ability of the bottom of the Nashen line will not be much better

As a leader, I believe that character and ability are very important factors in the recruitment and employment process. Character refers to a person's moral character and values, which is the basis for whether a person can be trusted and respected. Competence, on the other hand, refers to the skills and skills required to complete work tasks and achieve goals.

For some key positions and important jobs, we value the candidate's ability and experience more. For example, when developing a new project, we need capable team members to take on different tasks to ensure the success of the project. At this point, we focus more on the candidate's past performance and achievements.

However, for some support positions and entry-level positions, we pay more attention to the character and attitude of the candidate. For example, if we need an administrative assistant to assist us in our day-to-day work, we are more concerned about whether the candidate has good communication skills, whether they are proactive, whether they are a team player, etc. These personality and attitude traits can help employees better integrate into the team and complete their work tasks better.

As a specific example, our company once hired an administrative assistant. Although his professional abilities are not the best, we find his character and attitude to be very good. He is always proactive in completing tasks and has a strong focus on communication and cooperation with his colleagues.

In the team, he quickly gained recognition and affection from other employees. This employee later became the backbone of the company and made great contributions to the company's development.

Therefore, we believe that in the process of recruitment and employment, we need to take into account character and ability, not only to select those with excellent ability, but also to pay attention to those with excellent character and attitude. Only in this way can we build a high-quality team and achieve the healthy development of the enterprise.