-
AMD has strong floating-point computing capabilities, which are good for computation and programming, gaming, and image processing.
-
This doesn't matter much, the stability of the Pentium is slightly better, in short, it can be said that there is no difference in your situation.
-
The low-end selection of AMD, the high-end selection of buckle meat.
The stability of the Pentium is slightly better, and that was a few years ago.
-
Intel's CPU is better for graphic design. Since it is a graphic design, there are more designers who use PS, and software such as PS is often more dependent on single-core performance, and Intel's Core series CPUs have always been known for their high frequency and powerful single-core performance.
Coupled with the long-term cooperative relationship between Intel and these software companies, the optimization is also in place, so Intel's CPU performance is better in this kind of graphic design software. After the launch of AMD's Ryzen processor in recent years, the single-core performance has also improved a lot, and the single-core performance is still not as good as Intel's, and it can only be suppressed by multi-core, which is more suitable for those users who do 3D modeling and rendering.
-
Inter is recommended if I draw professionally.
Intel's Pentium series CPU is mid-to-high-end, office, drawing, professional use is the first choice, the Sheep series is for AMD's low-end CPU, how to prepare before, from the beginning of the Sheep D era, there has been a lot of progress. AMD series CPUs are mainly aimed at users who are keen on games, playing games well, cost-effective, and the first choice for Internet cafes. Back then, there was "punching high-end Intel, kicking low-end with the same frequency and core is definitely Intel's good."
If you compare drawing and CAD, you don't need to think about AMD. But in the same price range, except for PS, it is all stronger than AMD. On processors of the same price range, AMD tends to win such applications with multiple cores and high frequencies, but PS software does not seem to be impressed by AMD, and even the flagship X61100T is no match for the i5 750.
Stuffed sheep". Its high-end AMD CPU is also catching up with Intel!
Intel has always been known for its stability, and has good instruction support for many **, which is more suitable for some hobbyists, office machines, and some home computers that don't know much about computers. From the point of view of overclocking, since all Intel processors are locked multipliers, they do not show much advantage in overclocking; Although the CPU is locked in the multiplier, it can still be overclocked, but the overclocking range is smaller. The author does not change the voltage, the width of the imitation block P4 GB to GB, and in some 3D games, such as FIFA 2004, it can run stably, so the stability of Intel is still worthy of our trust.
For AMD, its most popular features are its good overclocking performance and low price**, which is the fundamental reason for its current market share of processors, as well as its advantages. When we choose, if we are DIY masters, then it is definitely right to choose AMD, you can get better performance for less money. **On,AMD and Intel with the same main frequency,The former**is only about half of the latter,And most of the motherboards of AMD's processors now have fool overclocking software,Although you can't play overclocking to the limit,But you can also get over the addiction of overclocking。
AMD's heating problem has always been everyone's biggest concern, in fact, AMD's processors have added more overheating protection chips, so the heating problem has been basically solved, don't worry.
AMD and Inter are actually the same on low-end machines, but if it's a professional drawing, it's still recommended to Inter.
-
First of all, the performance of the computer depends on the whole,Choose a good display,Large memory is very important,The difference between CPU is AMD or Intel is not big,Single-core Intel is better,Dual-core AMD is better,Mainly in the case of single core,Use PS to make a picture,P4Hyper-threading is optimized,But if it's Celeron and Semploy, there is no difference at this level。
-
1. AMD is suitable for gaming.
2. Not only consider the CPU and memory, but also the important thing is to see whether the rendering ability of the graphics card is strong, if your CPU is the best, and the graphics card is very bad, the final result is that the big bull with the old car can not play any soft performance.
-
AMD also supports HT technology, and AMD is optimized for graphics processing, so AMD's Athlons (Semblem does not support hyper-threading, but the game is good).
-
Intel and AMD both have CPUs that can meet the needs of design rendering very well, but for the same needs, AMD needs to cost much less. It doesn't matter if it's good or not, it depends on whether your wallet is full or not!
-
Intel's good nanofabrication level ratio.
AMD is one or two levels higher, the higher the level, the less heat is generated, and the more stable the operation.
The faster it is, and the less energy it consumes, it's up to you to get over this.
Personal budget. How much is it because the technology is better, and the ** is relatively high.
-
There are no problems with the CPUs of both brands.
As long as it is two new mid-to-high-end products, the performance is sufficient.
The cost performance can be seen in the latest Ryzen 3rd generation, R5 3600, R7 3700X) tablet design software does not have a CPU compatible.
The notebook chooses Intel, and the AMD processor of the notebook is still a certain gap with Intel, and there is a lack of high-end products.
-
Hello, both can be. I'm a renderer, using AMD CPUs, graphics cards, motherboards. Now the technology is very stable. So it's all right. My laptop is still Intel's, and because it's years old, the performance has long been gone.
-
It's all good ......Compatibility is completely no problem, you can choose anyone!
Because it is a design, the performance requirements for the hardware are relatively high......Choose a high-end model, such as a CPU equivalent to the Intel i7, so that you can ...... easily when making designs
-
CAD and PS are not very demanding on computers, and 3D is very demanding on hardware, so let's talk about your budget! AMD and Intel are not specific good or bad, the ruler is shortened, and the inch is longer. What's right for you is the best.
-
Disk budget host within 2000 or AMD! More than 2000 Intels!
-
Graphic design with the current Intel、AMD processors are OK,Choose which one is better,It depends on the landlord's budget,Which product performance is stronger,More cost-effective,Desktops currently look at AMD R5 3600X、R7 3700X processors are better choices,Intel processors with the same performance** are a lot more expensive。
However, if the landlord is ready to buy a notebook, the current high-performance notebook processor Intel still has certain advantages, and it is recommended to give priority to Intel's products.
-
FX8350 belongs to the 8-core bulldozer architecture CPU using AMD modular technology A little bit is that the 8-core support for multi-open program load is better than Intel4 core i5 4590 CPU, but i5 is much higher than AMD CPU of the same level in terms of single-core performance, and the heating power consumption is significantly lower than AMD FX8350 Personally, I recommend using Intel's CPU for mapping, which is better in this aspect And the requirements for memory graphics are the same as those for graphics cards The graphics card is responsible for the display rendering, and the CPU is the rendering process, taking care of both aspects.
-
Hello, dear, now, PS will be more advantageous with AMD.
Ask what about the graphics card.
What's there. Requirements.
And without a single show, dear
The products of the Adobe family eat more multi-core performance, and the single-core performance of the CPU at the same level does not bring much difference to the software of the Adobe family.
Question: Is 8G of RAM enough?
Ask if the display resolution is a little higher.
If you have enough money, the higher the better.
Question: Can you recommend a price?
Which one do you like, show me the configuration?
You can take a look at this, dear
1。For users who often use multi-** and plane processing software, priority should be given to multi-** instruction sets are richer and AMD's CPUs support a very large number of multi** instruction sets, compared with Intel's CPU multi** processing performance is better, especially not and multi** and plane processing software are specially optimized for Intel's SEE, SEE2 and other multi** instruction sets. >>>More
If it is 3200 blocks with a host, then it is recommended that the landlord choose AMD's CPU. >>>More
CPU can't be upgraded, it is recommended to install a graphics card GTS450 If you think it's high, then change to a Blaupunkt HD6670 1G If you still feel high, then change to HD6570 The graphics card can only be like this! GTS450 750 or so HD6670 1G 600 or so HD6570 450 or so Don't buy a graphics card below 400 that is similar to what you are using now. Memory plus root 2G 800 of about 180 Although it will be downclocked 667 But 4G memory and 2G memory are still very different from using it In general, it costs about 650 to make your computer a grade! >>>More
Cheap PC configuration? Is it a low-end configuration? It's an entry-level computer in around 2000. That's a lower dual-core 64-bit CPU >>>More
First of all, the CPU will not ring, there is no physical mechanical operation, see if the CPU fan is short of oil or loose or something. In addition, the hard disk also has a sound when running things, and it has a mechanical operation.