Is it better to have an inte or an AMD CPU for home use?

1。For users who often use multi-** and plane processing software, priority should be given to multi-** instruction sets are richer and AMD's CPUs support a very large number of multi** instruction sets, compared with Intel's CPU multi** processing performance is better, especially not and multi** and plane processing software are specially optimized for Intel's SEE, SEE2 and other multi** instruction sets.

2。For users who regularly engage in 3D graphics, professional graphics processing, and gaming, CPUs with strong floating-point computing and 3D processing capabilities should be preferred. In this regard, AMD's CPU is somewhat stronger than Intel's.

Intele 5200 or 53

AMD Athlonon II X2 240 or AMD Athlonon II X2 215

AMD's good AMD is cheap and fast The current AMD series is different from the previous one, and the heat dissipation has improved a lot, so it is also very stable, and Intel's price is too expensive, and the speed is not good.

Cheap Intel stuff doesn't work at all, so I personally think AMD is better.

Generally speaking, AMD's CPU basically does not have a core display except for the APU, and now Intel's U generally has a core display, so Intel's U** includes the price of the core display.

Second, the characteristics of the two are different, the so-called same performance generally refers to the comprehensive performance of the CPU, AMD multi-core, the comprehensive running score is higher, but many applications do not need more than dual cores, Intel has the advantage in these applications, so not all applications are completely the same performance, for online games, even Intel's cheaper CPU is stronger. But playing a single machine, such as 860K, obviously has an advantage over the Pentium G3258 at the same price.

In fact, a closer look can find that 860K is between Pentium and i3, and FX8300 is between i3 and i5.

Because of the different characteristics, the on-demand selection is more scientific, the two have their own reason for existence after a long time of market competition, what conclusions can be drawn from non-me, and the two do not care who can win in the battle of words, it is the last word to make money, the two are not enemies, but a kind of opposition and unity, we put our own subjective opinions on them too much.

The same performance is not much cheaper, but AMD's CPU architecture is relatively backward, and the performance is supported by the number of heap cores, and many performance indicators are worse than low-end IU, especially single-threaded, Genben 4 a level. And the heat of AU is too scary, many radiators can't be suppressed, AU is lower than IU, and other really can't compare to IU

Because he can't do it, someone buys it if it's cheap.