Ask for psychological experiments humorous points .

I'm going to write out 4 experiments that I think are interesting, and I'll add them if you like them.

1.In 1901, the Russian psychologist Paplov studied the "Forward Reflex" experiment, a derivative experiment of the conditioned reflex experiment.

2.In 1920, American psychologist John Watson studied the infamous "Little Albert" experiment.

3.In 1967, the American psychologist Seligman studied the "learned helplessness" experiment.

4.In 1979, Alan Lange, a female professor at Harvard University, researched the "printer" experiment.

American psychology researchers have conducted an interesting psychological experiment called the "scar experiment".

They declared to the volunteers involved that the experiment was to observe how people reacted to strangers with physical impairments, especially those with facial scars.

Each volunteer was placed in a small room without mirrors, where a professional Hollywood makeup artist created a bloody and shocking scar on the left side of his face. After the volunteers were allowed to use a small mirror to see the effect of their makeup, the mirror was removed.

The critical absence is the final step, and the makeup artist says that another layer of powder needs to be applied to the surface of the scar to prevent it from being accidentally wiped off. In fact, the makeup artist secretly wiped off the traces of makeup with a paper towel.

Unbeknownst to the public, volunteers were sent to the waiting rooms of various hospitals, tasked with observing how people reacted to their facial scars.

When the allotted time came, the returning volunteers invariably recounted the same feelings – they were rude, unfriendly, and always stared at their faces! But in reality, their faces were the same as usual, nothing different; The reason why they came to such a conclusion is that the misconception of the nucleus is that their judgment is affected by the wrong self-perception.

It's really a thought-provoking experiment.

It turns out that how a person sees himself in the heart can feel what kind of vision he sees in the outside world. At the same time, this experiment also validates a Western adage from one side: "Others see you the way you see themselves." "Isn't it?

It can be said that what kind of inner world there is, what kind of external vision there is. In this way, if a person complains about his situation for a long time about indifference, unfairness, and lack of sunshine, it means that it is his own inner world that is really wrong, and it is his perception of himself that is biased. At this time, what needs to be changed is your own heart; And once the inner world improves, the situation outside the body will inevitably improve.

After all, in this world, only you can determine how others see you.

We often put a lot of effort into understanding others and knowing others, but we rarely put in the energy to understand ourselves and know ourselves. We generally can't see our own appearance directly, only through the mirror, ** nothing. In the same way, we generally know ourselves through the eyes of others, you are different in the eyes of everyone, there are 100 you in the eyes of 100 people, there are a thousand you in the eyes of 1000 people, you are different in the eyes of different people, kind, smart, hateful, stupid, loyal, hypocritical, betrayal, the list goes on.

So what is the real you like, and what is the real you?

The "Scar Experiment" clearly tells us the answer - inside, a person with an irritable heart is manic even if he is in seclusion, and a person with a pure heart is still pure in his world although he is deep in the city.

Whether it's the pursuit of happiness, tranquility, safety, ......Go all to your heart and find it, where there are endless resources and energies.

My dear, there is no one else out there but yourself ».

Question Type:

1 Explanation of terms.

2 Material Analysis Questions.

3 Essay questions.

4 Experimental Design Questions.

The specific topics are:

1.Explanation of the noun (explanation of the specific meaning).

Priming effect? The experimenter effect? Asking for features?

Experimental Design: Participant Room Design? Within-subject design? Hybrid design?

When reacting? (Look at both speed and accuracy).

Experimental Ridge Division?

The experimental logic of the addition (subtraction) factor method?

A question of reliability?

What are the three experimental methods of signal detection theory?

Operational definition? Traditional psychophysical methods: traditional methods of memory research of absolute liminality, relative liminality, and differential liminality?

What are the basic components of doing experiments?

Experimental design: (control method for additional variables).

How do you evaluate an experimental design? (Criteria for evaluation).

What is the operational definition of common attention?

Three Approaches to Behavioral Research?

Expectation error and habit error? Practice error vs. fatigue error?

Signal Detection Theory: Calculation Method.

Hit probability? Probability of failure?

3.Essay questions.

What should I pay attention to when reflecting the experiment?

What is the general procedure for experimental psychology research?

3.Design of Experiments.

First, if a game developer designs a game that claims to improve students' reading skills after three months of use, please explain how to test their findings and design an experiment to illustrate this.

Second, if the hippocampus in the human brain is related to complex thinking processing, but not simple thinking processing, how to verify this conclusion? Someone devised such an experiment with twenty animals of the same breed and cut off the hippocampus

Ten of them are trained in simple thinking, and the animals can become proficient after one or two trainings:

The other ten are trained in complex thinking, and each animal needs an average of three or four training sessions to master.