I want to buy a home digital camera suitable for watching concerts

You want to capture a picture at a concert, if it's a fast song type, it's the kind of concert that jumps and jumps. Home-grade consumer digital cameras are certainly not up to the task, as they are all electronic shutters. You can't avoid pressing the shutter as you said.

If you want to capture the shot, you still have to have a mechanical shutter, so it is recommended to get an entry-level SLR. Moreover, the lighting at the concert site is very chaotic and the sound is also very noisy, and this environment has high requirements for digital cameras. Also, given your distance from the singer, you may also need a telephoto ......Otherwise, nothing will be illuminated.

The key is how much budget does the landlord have?

I recommend you Samsung IT100, which is very suitable for concerts. This camera has 12 million pixels, clear and delicate images, and the reproduction of colors is very realistic. The shutter response is also fast, and the optical image stabilization is excellent, so it's great for capturing.

And with a 28mm wide angle, 5x optical zoom, the long-range effect and framing range are good. Perfect for taking photos of concerts. The battery life is also excellent, with 400 shots in a row no problem.

**Around 1500.

It depends on your financial strength!

First of all, I want to tell you a common sense: filming a concert requires a telephoto lens, which can be used like a telescope to bring a distant task closer. However, tours are generally done with wide-angle lenses to be able to fit more scenery. The differences and functions of these two lenses are different.

Secondly, when filming a concert, the lighting is generally very dim, and a large aperture lens is required (** is more expensive), and if you are not in the innermost field, I am afraid you will have to use more than 100,000 equipment. Otherwise, it will be difficult to shoot a good result.

If the financial strength can afford it, it is recommended to have a full-frame body such as the Nikon D700, a lens of about 15,000 and 70-200mm. Canon 5D2+70-200 lenses are also possible. But this lens is not suitable for tourism, because it is heavier and larger.

Such a lens plus the body will cost at least 30,000 yuan.

If you pay more attention to your usual travel and life use, take into account the fun of shooting some concerts or something, and have average economic strength, you can buy a non-full-frame body, such as Nikon D7000, and buy an original lens of 18-200. In addition, other accessories such as spare batteries, camera bags, UV mirrors, cards, etc., can be done within 20,000 yuan or 10,000 or thousand.

Shooting a concert without a little bit of a foundation to shoot out the effect is very bad, this is my personal experience, with the camera rushed to shoot the Ah Mei concert, but when I went home, the effect was miserable, in fact, according to your budget, you don't think about the concert first, buy an entry machine, such as Canon 600D set of machines to study seriously, after the technology comes out, then match the lens, there is a saying called buy the cheapest body to buy the most expensive lens you can afford. With a good lens, it produces good results like an entry-level camera. The work is affected by the lens accounts for 8 percent, and the remaining 2 percent is affected by the camera, the most important thing is the person who holds the camera, remember that the SLR is not a card machine, just pick it up and press the shutter.

If you just think that you can shoot a good ** with a SLR, and you are not willing to learn systematically, then you buy a SLR and shoot ** may not be as good as a card machine.

If it's 3,400,000, buy a Canon entry-level 1100d, and buy a 55-250 75-300 telephoto.

You have to see where you shoot at the concert Different distances and different lenses are used 70-200 Constant** around 400mm If you are far away, it is estimated that it is not enough Your budget is too low, hehe In fact, many times you can shoot clearly A better card machine can be clearly visible The answer on the next floor 18-200 The original ** is also 5300.

It can only be a DSLR, for the following reasons:

1.First of all, the ambient light is very dark, and the actors are very fast, so the shutter speed must be very fast, and the ISO must not be very high, otherwise the noise will fly all over the sky. So the lens must be big! There should be enough light intake. It is difficult to meet the above requirements if it is not a DSLR.

2.Your position is on the outside, so go for a lens with a large zoom ratio, 20x 30x of this. You can't have this with a normal camera.

3.You're a newbie, so take a little time to learn. SLRs won't be eliminated anytime soon, because it's the highest level of cameras, and they're all "powerful" (and deceptive, of course).

If you're interested, you can learn it quickly, don't read those tutorials, many of them are simply complicated, and often scare novices. Therefore, the best way to learn is to study on your own or find a teacher to take you (note that this method is not a lecture, it is necessary to practice while learning).

Therefore, I suggest that you go and get a DSLR, you don't have to buy it, you can ask someone to borrow it. Be sure to get a good lens, the lens is large, it is best to get a telephoto lens and a tripod, and you must know a little bit of videography first. If you are really interested, you can buy a better one, so that you don't have to change it again when you are proficient in the future.

But be sure to learn.

Finally, a few words, that rendering is not an ordinary SLR can be taken, it is taken by a camera dedicated to shooting actors, just like the kind of camera in the New Year's party, it is difficult for us civilians to achieve this effect. But if it's not a DSLR, the ** shot in the concert must not be appreciated.

Nikon D90, D300S

The other heads look at themselves, if they shoot a concert, shoot this level, at least 70-200mm

Do you want to shoot a DSLR with this effect? Or a newbie? Oh my God, you better not burn money!

With that money, I bought several seats in the first row! It is recommended to buy an ordinary SLR, add a telephoto lens, and a fixed tripod. How to play, hehe, let the camera seller teach you!

o( o If you want to shoot in the outfield, it is estimated that this scene should be more than 400mm head, if you are not a professional shooter, it is better not to burn the SLR. It's too much money!!

Buy a digital camera with a large zoom ratio and search online for 30x zoom kinds.

If you can buy a tripod or monopod to carry with you, that's the best.

It is best to choose a DSLR or mirrorless.

In fact, the shooting effect of the camera is also related to the lens used in addition to the camera, and there is little difference between the mirrorless camera and the SLR camera in terms of power. In terms of the body, Canon Nikon's mid-range camera still shoots very well.

In terms of lenses, you can try to use a telephoto lens, when buying a camera, you can try to buy a lens with a focal length of about 135mm, and if the distance is close, a 105mm focal length is also fine.

When filming a concert, you must reduce the camera's ** time, you can try to use the camera's aperture priority mode, adjust the aperture of the camera lens up, increase the brightness of the camera lens, and finally improve the sensitivity of the camera, so that you can improve the shooting effect of the camera.

According to your requirements, it is a bit difficult to get a DSLR camera (it can be said to be very difficult), unless you buy a second-hand SLR, you can get a stand-alone machine for about 2000, and there is a balance of 3000 left, it is difficult to buy a lens that meets your requirements, even if it is not possible to use 2 hands.

Canon SX10 is 20x optical variation, 10 million pixels, 1 CCD, full manual support of about 3000.

Canon SX1 is 20x light variation, 10 million pixels, 1 CMOS, full manual support of more than 4000.

The difference between the SX1 and the SX10 is that CMOS optics are used, but the online evaluation** shows that the quality of the SX10** is better than the SX1 in all aspects, and the purple edge of the SX1 is very serious. I suggest you buy the sx10, the quality of the Canon camera is known to everyone, this machine is also cost-effective, and more importantly, it is the first telephoto camera with a wide angle in the Canon consumer camera (the wide angle is very important, whether it is home photography or landscape), buy the sx10, buy a full set on the ** is only about 2500, more than 3000 in the mall, it is not expensive.

As for Olympus, it has not developed well in recent years, and it feels like a sunset, and now it can't be compared with Canon, and there is no advantage in **. Of course, emaciated camels are larger than horses, which can also be considered.

"There must be a DSLR, plus 20 or more to be zoomed" SLR is a structure, not a function.

If you buy a car, you can say buy one with automatic transmission, you can't say buy one with an SUV, the SLR does not have a 20x zoom, I think the lens of the SLR can be changed, the starting focal length can be changed, the 300-800mm lens is less than 3x zoom, and you can see much farther than those 20 times, if you shoot a concert, the distance is 150 meters, at least a 300mm lens, Fujifilm's S2000

The Nikon P80 can barely be used.

5000You can only buy a set of machines,High iso+ anti-shake is recommended for poor indoor light,Sony's alpha series is good,CCD anti-shake effect is not bad,If you buy an anti-shake lens, it's not cheap。 In addition, the SLR does not have the concept of Xx zoom, and the longer the focal length, the greater the possibility of jitter, which is a pair of contradictions.

Such a budget can only enter an entry-level telephoto lens, the general aperture is up to f4, and it is very difficult to shoot moving objects in a dark environment.

Canon SX10 IS Canon SX1 IS 20 can be bought on **vary widely.

- - Digital cameras.

Just consider two brands.

It's good to buy Canon.

To look good buy Sony--

A DSLR, of course, preferably a full pair!

The concert does not have very high requirements for the camera, but there are still some requirements for your skills:

When watching a concert, the brightness of the light is not the main problem, but the distance you are at. Nowadays, the distance to watch a show is generally far, so you may always extend the zoom to take a long shot, because the focal length is long, the shutter speed has to be fast, so your image is always unclear and blurry.

The main way to solve this problem is to use a tripod. But you may not feel very convenient, there are many people, and the shelf is not good, so I suggest you buy a small single-leg stand (it is retractable, dozens of yuan), and install the camera on the single-leg stand, and the shelf is supported on the ground, which will be much better for you.

You try it first and use it.

As for the camera, it is better to zoom a little bigger, the noise of the CCD is lower, and the aperture of the lens is larger, and that's fine. I suggest that you can consider:

Canon SX100, Canon SX110, it's OK, ** around 2000 yuan.

If you want it any better, you can consider, Canon G series.