Ask for debate materials on which is more important in school life to accumulate knowledge and devel

Qualities in psychology refer to certain innate qualities of a person.

Characteristics also refer to the physical harmony that people are born with and are empowered by nurturing, shaping, and exercising.

Personality traits. Moreover, the family must mainly carry out quality training for children, and the school mainly carries out knowledge education. Moreover, the family is an individual education, which is highly targeted and has a more obvious effect; School is a group education that does not take into account everyone's details. It can be seen that the innate part of the literacy must come from the family, and the acquired part is mainly from the family.

However, the characteristics of adolescence are the formation of the three views, and for the guidance of this area only the family can do, although the family and the school have their own advantages and complement each other, but for the adolescent period we should pay more attention to the cultivation of morality and the three views, and the family does better in this regard.

1. A person with a lot of knowledge is not necessarily a good person.

Examples of highly educated killings can be cited.

2. The time for character development is limited.

3. Good character can promote learning, and bad character affects learning4. Knowledge earns more money for a while, and good habits benefit for life.

Collect 3 to 5 examples. The sentences should not be redundant and powerful. Let's talk about it in combination with the current state of study.

Here's what I think about it.

1.First of all, I would like to express my point of view, regarding quality, I personally think that what is called in school is only theoretical knowledge, and the management in practical aspects is not particularly in place. And the growth of personal quality, is the teacher more concerned or the parents more concerned?

The answer is unequivocal. It must be parents, they will constantly correct their children's own problems, for their children's sake, even a small mistake will not be easily let go. But as long as you don't make big mistakes at school, teachers basically don't manage them.

2.Then there is the problem of quantity, which is basically 2-1 or 2-2 at home, and 1-35 50 in school, and the teacher is not omnipotent, how can there be so much energy?

3.It is said that parents are children's enlightenment teachers, and children's imitation ability is very strong, and children at this time are in **? It's all at home, so who do they imitate?

Not your own parents yet? This kind of imitation of parents may determine the direction of his personality and literacy in the future. You can also find some examples of this kind of thing online.

1. From the history of human development and the process of human growth, it is proved that there is family education first, and then school education.

2 Family education is individualized production, and school education is mass production. The key is the quality of the producer. It's the quality of parents and teachers.

3 Judging from the effect. Family, school, and society are 3 aspects that constitute the education of adolescents and interact with each other. are very important, and the foundation is that family education is the quality of parents.

4 From the perspective of the quality composition of young people, ideological quality, labor skills, and physical quality. then family education bears more content and responsibilities. Therefore, it is relatively important.

5 In terms of the cost of education, parents contribute the most. If parents don't send their children to school, there is no way for school education to survive.

FYI.

Hello 375duan!

Your question involves the majority of parents and teachers are very concerned about and eager to solve the problem.

It's so easy!

1. May I ask the opponent's defense friend, why did Yue Fei serve the country loyally, but ended up like this?

In the previous argument, it must be mentioned that every kind of character has its own environment to adapt to, and different environments require different qualities. In this way, when asking questions, you can ask some questions about putting people with high quality in a vulgar environment. Or ask questions about examples that bring vulgar people to an elegant environment.

The most direct answer to this question is "the quality of loyalty to the country is not suitable for the environment of the faint king", of course, the other party will not say so, it depends on how you explain it.

Prepare 2-5 questions like this, but it is best not to raise more than 2 of them when arguing freely, because it will work well if you bombard.

2. May I ask the opponent's defense friend, what are we cultivating character for?

After this question is asked, according to the other party's answer, the ultimate goal is to live in society, and then compare it with your own point of view and accumulate knowledge in life.

Pros: 1. According to the definition of a student, the reason why a student is a student is determined by his or her characteristics. And the norm defines what a student is.

2.Don't follow the rules, you can try to give some examples of students ignoring the norms and committing crimes, after all, facts speak louder than words...

Disadvantages: 1. Norms are determined by people and are dead, and it is not necessarily perfect in itself, and it cannot be suitable for every student, which is likely to limit the innovation and development of students.

2. According to the definition of students, the argument is said first, not necessarily only students in the school, there are many people in the society, they are also learning knowledge, but they are not students in the narrow sense, do they have to abide by it? The specification itself has certain limitations...